詳細検索結果
以下の条件での結果を表示する: 検索条件を変更
クエリ検索: "浄国寺" さいたま市
2件中 1-2の結果を表示しています
  • 原田 智也, 西山 昭仁
    地震 第2輯
    2022年 75 巻 107-124
    発行日: 2022/11/02
    公開日: 2022/11/17
    ジャーナル 認証あり

    The most authoritative catalog of Japanese historical damaging earthquakes lists a M~6 earthquake of Jan. 11, 1859 near Iwatsuki, Saitama Prefecture, in the Kanto district of central Japan. The earthquake is said to have damaged Iwatsuki Castle considerably, and the seismic intensity there is evaluated as 5-upper on the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) scale. However, the only historical source of the damage is a Tokugawa shogunate official document of Mar. 9, 1859 describing that it lent the lord of the Iwatsuki Castle money for repairing the castle damage caused by a “previous earthquake.” Although the date of the “previous earthquake” is not written explicitly, the editor of the catalog considered the earthquake to be the Jan. 11 event felt strongly in a wide area of the Kanto district. Since there is no other record of damage caused by this earthquake despite that many documents were written in those days, we examined whether the “previous earthquake” is truly the 1859 Jan. 11 event or not. We discovered the historical document entitled “Sho-ammon-utsushi”, a collection of transcripts of official documents of the Iwatsuki clan, which has been unknown in Japanese historical seismology. It contains a transcript of the letter asking the Tokugawa shogunate for lending money of reconstruction following the 1855 earthquake disaster. The letter was written on Dec. 4, 1855, 23 days after the 1855 Nov. 11 Edo (present Tokyo) earthquake (M 7.0-7.1) that killed about 10,000 people mainly in Edo, about 30 km south of Iwatsuki. In the letter, severe damage in and around the castle town of Iwatsuki caused by the Edo earthquake is described in detail, which is new valuable information regarding the Edo earthquake. On the other hand, no record related to the 1859 earthquake is found in the “Sho-ammon-utsushi.” Therefore, we conclude that the “previous earthquake” is the 1855 Edo earthquake and that the 1859 earthquake was not a damaging one. By comparing the intensity distribution of ground shakings of the 1859 event with the seismic intensity distributions of various earthquakes in the Kanto district during 1919-2021, we infer that the 1859 earthquake was an M 4-class event in the depth range 40-80 km beneath the area around 36.1˚N and 139.8˚E. We evaluate the seismic intensity at Iwatsuki due to the 1855 Edo earthquake as 5-upper or 6-lower on the JMA scale, which has been unknown so far.

  • ──緑地の公共財的性格の観点から──
    堀江 典子, 萩原 清子, 木村 富美子, 朝日 ちさと
    地域学研究
    2015年 45 巻 3 号 333-349
    発行日: 2015年
    公開日: 2016/03/09
    ジャーナル フリー
    Supply systems for various public goods change with changes in socioeconomic circumstances. Green spaces in urban areas such as parks and roadside greenery have various functions, including environmental preservation, landscape, recreation and disaster prevention. Recently, many cities try to increase green space in both public-owned and private-owned areas. Public-owned greeneries include urban parks with various facilities, roadside greeneries, riverside areas, agricultural parks, retention basin, public school sites, cultural facility sites, government building sites, and other public accommodations. Private-owned greeneries include leased land parks, nongovernmental athletic fields, greenery around factory sites, greenery in commercial and business sites, private school sites, private gardens, and zoning sites designated by law or city regulations.
    However, to determine how and by which sector, public or private, these green spaces should be supplied, it is necessary to clarify the relationships between the characteristics of green space as public goods, which show non-excludability and non-competitiveness, and the supply of these spaces. This study concentrates on the relationships between these characteristics and the supply of greenery. The use and supply of green space in Saitama City, which has a large area and variety of greenery spaces, was examined through administrative documents.
    Consequently, we showed there are various green spaces supplied by various procedures. Green spaces of non-excludability and competitiveness are supplied by the public sector. Green spaces of non-excludability are supported by volunteers. Greenery of excludability is regulated by administrations. Characteristics as public goods of the use of greenery space appear to reflect city policies and citizen needs, such as necessities for revitalization of agricultural land and enthusiasm for sports activities. Greenery supply systems need to be reconsidered as regional positive choices after due consideration of the characteristics as public goods.
    JEL Classification:H41, H23, R59
feedback
Top