The purpose of his article is to clarify the problem on the landscape-management at historical landscape in Asuka village, Nara pref. Conclusions are below: (1) The main methods of landscape-management is to maintain economic activities which is agriculture and forestry. (2) The aim of projects about public owned land is to promote the development of sightseeing. (3) The main problems are to be left the landscape to run wild, and to be insufficient of the torchbearers. (4) Residents' perception shows that they recognize the regional-landscape honor and want the understandings and supports of all the people. To create the better landscape-management, it is significant to experiment the new methods and to prepare the total landscape planning and involve both residents' and many people's participation.

抄録全体を表示

 Asuka village in Nara prefecture is designated as one of the special preservation areas for historic landscape since 1960's and is well-known for its richness in historic remains originated from Asuka period. This paper focuses on rural house compounds from six different village sections. Village sections located within the plain area are classified into three groups in terms of village layout, i.e. group 1: clustered village (Okuyama, Kawahara and Noguchi), group 2: linear village along the street with east-west axis (Asuka), group 3: linear village along the street with north-south axis (Oka and Shimasho). Composition of rural house compounds in Asuka village and Nara basin consists of main building, directly attached to the main building (tsunoya) and further attached buildings (huzokuya, hanare). We firstly set up the hypothetical model for the building layout development pattern of house compounds which includes every possible extendable pattern of main and attached buildings. The model was examined by the result of our field research which revealed the fact that dominant development patterns follow the basic rule of traditional Japanese idea of the divination of the auspices of a house from its position and orientation.

抄録全体を表示

本稿では農村を構成している環境や住民, さらに生産や生活のための施設を対象にし, 農村がかかえている諸課題のうち, とりわけ80年代的課題ともいえる歴史的風土1) の保存と農林業の振興・生活環境の整備を計画的に解決するための農村計画のあり方について検討する。農村地域で生じている問題には総合的な性格を持っている場合が多いので, 総合的・計画的に対処していくことが必要であり, 現実の施策である 「市町村の基本構想」 「農振計画」 「農村総合整備計画」 等も, このような考え方を踏襲している。
しかしながら, これらの施策には, 「つみ上げ方式でないから農村計画が身近なものにならず, 実効性の面で問題」 とか 「つみ上げていくと多くのニーズがあがり, その調整方法が問題」 等の指摘をはじめ, 総合性・整合性・実効性の面で多くの問題があり, 農村計画の計画手法の開発が必要であるといわれている ⁽¹⁾ 。 本稿では, これらの諸課題の解決に有効と思われる神戸モデルを提起し, 80年代の農村計画の典型事例である明日香村に適用して, 農村計画上の諸問題について考察する。

抄録全体を表示