The connection between the two Caribbean texts, George Lamming's In the Castle of My Skin and C.L.R. James's The Black Jacobins, has been rarely identified especially with regards to their shared concern for mediating the masses. Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri rejects mediation in their foregrounding of the multitude, but in this rejection the dignity the masses have of their lands, as Franz Fanon encompasses, cannot be represented. In the process of decolonization, mediating this dignity is a form of responsibility in which Lamming and James differently partake, and is realized in critical engagement with their region. In The Black Jacobins, the masses are not represented monolithic but articulated as two types, "descriptive" and "transformative", a distinction Spivak makes in her reading of Marx's analysis of the class relation in The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. James's dialogue with Marxism prepares a concept of the transformative masses while the masses in Haitian Revolution are historically examined. Yet the contrast he draws with the leader of the revolution, Toussaint Louverture, enacts the necessity for them to mediate themselves. In Lamming's In the Castle of My Skin, such transformative masses are located near the end of the narrative in Trumper's knowledge of the black people in the US. Before reaching this, the novel employs shame for the characters to locate denials that colonial education has instituted-the memory of slavery, the politics of language, and a feeling that would be alternative to shame. Shame thus witnesses the complicity between the colonized and the colonizer, which subsequently stimulates in the former a responsible sense for their own people. Lamming's use of shame consequently succeeds in representing the masses and despite their differences this representation is consonant with what James tried to do in his writings.
抄録全体を表示