Abstract
Section 1 asks exactly which methodology-alternative selection, or bilateral-allows for a greater “taste → taste” binomial link, i.e., the highest order of aesthetic receptivity experience. In order to grasp the actual state of receptivity to aesthetic properties, and conduct a practical investigation of the pros and cons of each methodology, incidences of receptivity to aesthetic properties were applied as a gauge. In particular, a comparison was made, from the viewpoint of differences between figures for receptivity to taste properties as value properties, and alternative selection found to be superior.
In Section 2, in the cases of both methodologies, greater content is achieved in terms of interpretation of the works and value judgment, however the particular focus was on the different aspects of the educational outcome. That is, observations were attempted via classification: examining the state of class properties while aiming for qualitative unity.
Summing up validity as a practical methodology, it was found that alternative selection helps to achieve more in terms of the experience of aesthetic receptivity, however when it comes to interpretation and value judgments, these are more encouraged by the bilateral method. alternative selection, bilateral selection.
