1980 Volume 35 Issue 4 Pages 221-228
To make clear the relationships between wind profile parameters and aerodynamic properties of the plant canopy, an analysis of wind profiles above canopy was carried out.
The results are summarized as follows:
(1) The equations of wind profile parameters ζ0(=zo/H) and δ(=d/H) were obtained in terms of uH/u* and CD as follows:
ζ0=(β0/kuH/u*)1/(1-m)exp[-k/(1-m)-uH/u*]=(β0/k√CD)1/(1-m)exp[-k/(1-m)√CD],
and
δ=1-(β0/kuH/u*)1/(1-m)exp[-km/(1-m)uH/u*]=1-(β0/k√CD)1/(1-m)exp[-km/(1-m)√CD],
where zo is roughness length, d zero-plane displacement, H height of canopy top, uH wind velocity at the height of H, u* friction velocity, CD total drag coefficient of the canopy, ζ0 the relative roughness length, and δ the relative zero-plane displacement. β0 and m are empirical constants.
(2) The empirical constants (β0 and m) may be determined by the equation,
λ0=β0ζm0=-k2(1-δ)/ln(1-δ/ζ0) The values of β0 and m estimated for several canopies are shown in Table 1. The main cause of differences in β0 and m may be ascribed to the changing of aerodynamic structure of canopies.
(3) The relation among zo, d and H was derived as:
lnH-d/z0=k2/β0H(H-d)/(z0/H)m.
The above relation seems to be applied for various types of plant canopies.
(4) The dependences of ζ0(=zo/H) and δ(=d/H) for Japanese larch canopies (Allen, 1968), maize crop (Maki, 1975a, 1976), and pasture grass (Kotoda, 1979) upon the total drag coefficient CD were fairly well approximated by Eq. (14) and Eq. (15), respectively.