The Japanese Journal of Antibiotics
Online ISSN : 2186-5477
Print ISSN : 0368-2781
ISSN-L : 0368-2781
EVALUATION OF CEFOTAXIME FOR POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION IN SURGERY
YOSHIMI NAKANISHIYOH-ICHI KASAIAKIRA MAEDANORIMITSU HASEGAWAMASAYOSHI HASEGAWAYOH-ICHI GOTOHTUKASA HIGAMASASHI TAKAMURAYOSHINORI YAGITAKASHI NAKAMURAIKUO HASHIMOTOYASUO SAWADAHIROMI HAKOZAKIJUNJI FUJISAWASHOHACHIROH MIYAMORIHIDEO SASAKISEIJI OOHIRAKENJI ABETADAHIRO SAKATASHIGEYUKI SHICHIKAZUYUKI TAGUCHIKUNISHIGE HIROSEAKIO NISHIMURAHIDEO KAGATANIKOH-ICHI KAWAMOTOHIDEAKI TAKAHASHIKIYOHIKO MIYAKAWAYASUSHI DANJOHMINORU HAMADAAKIRA TAMAOKITAKASHI SAITOHSHIGEYUKI KITAYAMAMUTSUHIKO MIYATAAKIO KAWAMURAISAMU KOSHINOFUMIMOTO IMAMURAKAZUMORI SHINJOHYUH-ICHI SHINODAFUMIAKI TAKAGITOMOYOSHI TAKAGIMASANORI YOSHIMOTOTOSHIKATSU TAMURA
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

1984 Volume 37 Issue 9 Pages 1729-1750

Details
Abstract

1. Cefotaxime (CTX) was microbiologically and clinically studied in surgery.
CTX shows excellent antibacterial activity in vitro against Gram-negative bacilli including E. coli, Klebsiella spp., and Proteus spp. in comparison with cefmetazole (CMZ) and cefazolin (CEZ).
2. Antibacterial activity of CTX is found to be superior to that of CEZ and equal to that of CMZ against Gram-positive bacteria (S. aureus and S. epidermidis).
3. The antibacterial activity of CTX against anaerobic bacteria exceeds that of CEZ and almost equal to that of CMZ. It also showed minimum inhibitory concentration values which, clinically speaking, offer great expectation.
4. CTX is also superior to CMZ and CEZ in its antibacterial activity against P. aeruginosa.
5. Clinical studies were carried out in the group A for which CTX was administered a drug of first choice for postoperative infections in surgery, and in the group B for which CTX was administered as a drug of second choice since the antibiotic of first choice had been ineffective for these cases.
As a result, high effective rates were obtained in both groups (80.3% for the group A, and 77.1% for the group B). With reference to the group B, an effectiveness rate of 100%, was obtained for the cases in which CEZ had been ineffective and 55.6% was obtained for 10 cases in which mainly combination of CMZ had been ineffective.
6. Side effects appeared in 3 cases (1 case each of tinnitus and malaise, vomiting and nausea, and fever) with an incidence rate of 1.46%.
Abnomal clinical laboratory findings appeared in 4 cases (1 case each of leukopenia and increase in GOT and GPT; eosinophilia; increases in platelet and monocyte; and increases in GOT, GPT and Al-P) with an incidence rate of 1.95%.

Content from these authors
© Japan Antibiotics Research Association
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top