The Japanese Journal of Antibiotics
Online ISSN : 2186-5477
Print ISSN : 0368-2781
ISSN-L : 0368-2781
CLINICAL EVALUATION OF TMS-19-Q·GC TABLET IN ACUTE TONSILLITIS
A COMPARATIVE DOUBLE BLIND STUDY WITH JOSAMYCIN
AKEMI KOIDEASAYA ICHIKAWABUEMON SANBEDAISUKE CHIKUIEFUMIKO IIDAHARUJI KINOSHITAHIDEAKI SUZUKIHIROKAZU SHIBUIHIROYUKI ZUSHOHITOME KOBAYASHIISAO TAKIMOTOISUZU KAWABATAITSUKO OGURAJUN HONDOKANETAKA MURAIKAORU SOYANOKEIKO KISHIKEN MUKAIKENSHI YAMAMOTOKENZO HIRATAKIMIKO ASANOKOHZO FUKAMIKOICHI DEGUCHIKOJI YAJINMASAO NAITOMASAO TSUKIYAMAMASARU OHYAMAMASATO SHIRAKURAMICHINORI KUROKAWAMIKIO YAGISAWAMITSUYOSHI NAKASHIMAMOTOYUKI HASHIBANAOKO KIKUCHINOBUHARU TAGASHIRANORIKO YAHATARINYA SUGITARYOHO UEDASHIGEKAZU TSUBAKISHIGENOBU IWATASHIGEO MASUDASHOZO KAWAMURASHUBUN TAKEBAYASHISHUJI OGURASHUNKICHI BABASUMITAKA ITAYATADASHI SUGASAWATAKAHIKO NOMURATAKASHI KAWAITAKESHI MARUOTETSUO ISHIITSUNEMASA SATOTSUTOMU HATANOTSUYOSHI TAKANOYASUICHI OHORIYASUO HARADAYASUYA NOMURAYOSHITO MORIYUTAKA FUJIMAKI
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

1985 Volume 38 Issue 5 Pages 1368-1388

Details
Abstract
In order to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of TMS-19-Q·GC tablet (TMS) with josamycin tablet (JM) in acute tonsillitis, the double blind trial was carried out with the daily dosage of 200 mg × 3 in TMS and 400 mg × 3 in JM.
Number of cases evaluated for clinical efficacy were 154 cases (73 treated with TMS and 81 treated with JM). The effective rating of TMS and JM were 89.0% and 88.9% judged by doctors in charge, and 82.2% and 85.2% judged by committee respectively. Bacteriological effects were satisfactory to yield the eradica-tion rates of 93.8% in TMS and 94.7% in JM.
Number of cases evaluated for safety were 199 cases (101 treated with TMS and 98 treated with JM). The incidence of side effect was 4.0% (4/101) in TMS and 5.1% (5/98) in JM and most of them were mild gastro-intestinal disorders.
Number of cases evaluated for utility were 156 cases (74 treated with TMS and 82 treated with JM). The usefulness rates were 85.1% in TMS and 86.6% in JM.
There was no significant difference between TMS and JM, in clinical effect, bacteriological effect, safety and utility.
From these results, daily 600 mg dosage of TMS was as useful as daily 1,200 mg dosage of JM in the treatment for acute tonsillitis.
Content from these authors
© Japan Antibiotics Research Association
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top