Asian Pacific Journal of Dentistry
Online ISSN : 2185-3487
Print ISSN : 2185-3479
Comparing gap between dentin and composite using optical coherence tomography and leakage test
Abu Hasan Mohammad KhaledTakaaki Sato Tomoko TabataMengtian ZhaoKota KibeMasaomi IkedaYasushi Shimada
Author information
JOURNAL OPEN ACCESS FULL-TEXT HTML Advance online publication

Article ID: 24-0014

Details
Abstract

Purpose: The study aimed to compare the gap formation between dentin and resin composite using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and the leakage test.

Methods: Three cavities were prepared for each bovine tooth (coronal, cervical, and root). Cavities were filled by Scotchbond Universal Plus Adhesive and Filtek Supreme Flowable Restorative. After 24 h storage in water, the interface was analyzed at the bottom of the cavity using OCT. They were then cut and immersed in 50% ammoniacal silver nitrate (AgNO3) solution and photo-development solution for a leakage test. Next, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) assessed the cavity bottom interface. Two-dimensional (2D) images of both devices were analyzed to calculate the sealed interface percentage (SI%). The mean SI% values for adhesive were statistically analyzed by multiple comparisons using the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn's test with Bonferroni correction, with the significance level set at α = 0.05.

Results: No significant differences were observed among the three sites for either OCT (P < 0.05) or EDS (P < 0.05). Significant differences were observed between OCT and EDS at each site (P = 0.005, P < 0.001, P = 0.004, respectively). When comparing OCT and EDS, EDS detected significantly more white lines (lower SI%) in all locations.

Conclusion: The OCT device showed different detection results compared to the conventional EDS-based leakage method. On the other hand, there was no significant difference in the measurements across different sites of the tooth with either method.

Content from these authors
© 2025 Japanese Dental Science Federation

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Next article
feedback
Top