JOURNAL OF RURAL PLANNING ASSOCIATION
Online ISSN : 1881-2309
Print ISSN : 0912-9731
ISSN-L : 0912-9731
Examination of the Differences of WTP and Improvement for Benefit Function Transfer -A Case Study of Amenity Benefit in Regional Water Resource Program-
Takafumi OISHI
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2002 Volume 21 Issue 21-suppl Pages 49-54

Details
Abstract
In this paper, I examined the applicability of benefit function transfer to policy evaluation, as a case study of amenity benefit in regional water resource program. By calculating differences in WTP between original model and transferred model, I found that about half of the sites had the percentage differences of 30% or greater. Improving the specification of benefit function and selecting study sites would help us to make benefit function transfer more feasible.
Content from these authors
© THE ASSOCIATION OF RURAL PLANNING
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top