Abstract
In this paper, we analyze the effect of the unique method of Matto City mentioned before papers. It turns out that the method can considerably control the size of “Residual Zone”. But it can not adequately control the location and function of “Residual Zone”. On the other hand, the method is generally effective for cancelling the designation of “Agricultural Land Zone”. But, it can sometimes permit inadequate cancellation, such as in case of the farmlands locatedfar from rural living area. So, some conditions for the improvement of it are clarified as follows.
1. Three indexes judging adequateness of size and location of “Residual Zone” ; “the size of Residual Zone compared with the farmland conversion”, “the ratio of the farmer holding farmland in Residual Zone” and “the density of road in Residual Zone”.
Especialy in case of cancellation, the following conditions must be regarded.
2. Allocational relation between a tract of farmland and a rural living area, and cancellation rules based on it.
3. Adaptation of the rules in according to land use objective.
4. Necessity of zoning in according to the profiles of rural area.
