Anthropological Science
Online ISSN : 1348-8570
Print ISSN : 0918-7960
ISSN-L : 0918-7960
Original Articles
Dental metric variability associated with human migration from skeletal remains of two Jomon sites (Yoshigo and Inariyama) in the Atsumi Peninsula area
WATARU MORITASOICHIRO KUSAKAWATARU YANOMASATO NAKATSUKASA
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS FULL-TEXT HTML

2012 Volume 120 Issue 2 Pages 167-177

Details
Abstract

This study investigated interpopulation genetic relationships in the Jomon Atsumi Peninsula area, comparing the pattern of human migration revealed by strontium isotope ratio with dental metric variation of Yoshigo and Inariyama skeletal remains. Morphological differences were evaluated between the local and immigrant groups to determine whether or not local populations had become completely homogenized by human migration. We have constructed 4 × 4 contingency tables consisting of four clusters derived from K-means clustering of dental measurements and four groups (immigrants and locals of the two sites), and evaluated their correlations by Fisher’s exact test. The results revealed that human migration pattern was significantly correlated with dental metric variation, suggesting that there was regional heterogeneity among Jomon populations in the Atsumi Peninsula area. Although the distinction between immigrants and locals of Yoshigo and Inariyama populations based on strontium isotope analysis was not completely in accord with dental metric variability, most of the identified immigrants exhibited dental profiles that were beyond each local profile as determined using principal component analysis. Furthermore, the dental metric variances of the immigrants were significantly larger than those of the locals, suggesting multiple origins. The microdifferentiation among populations in the Atsumi Peninsula area may suggest nonrandom kin-structured migration and/or population aggregation from surrounding areas.

Introduction

The Jomon period spanned from 13000 to 2300 years BP in the Japanese archipelago (Imamura, 1996a; Habu, 2004). The Jomon people were Neolithic hunter-gatherers who are well known for their cord-marked pottery. They generally led a sedentary life and effectively exploited marine and terrestrial resources. In the Late to Final Jomon period (c. 4000–2300 years BP), the Jomon population declined due to climatological cooling and associated environmental changes (Koyama, 1978); during this period the Jomon developed ritual practices and artifacts but did not drastically change their subsistence strategies (Imamura, 1996a; Habu, 2004). The Jomon culture eventually ended with waves of migration of agriculturalists with wet rice cropping from continental East Asia, except for Hokkaido (Imamura, 1996b; Chisholm and Koike, 1999; Tsude, 2001; Kobayashi et al., 2004).

The Atsumi Peninsula area (the Atsumi Peninsula and the surrounding area of the Tokai region located in the central part of the Japanese archipelago) is one of the areas where many Jomon shell mounds are situated. In this region, the number of shell mounds began to increase from the beginning of the Late Jomon period (c. 4000–3000 years BP), and many of them were formed during the Final Jomon period (c. 3000–2300 years BP). Despite the general population decline through the Late to Final Jomon period, the Tokai region still retained a greater population density than the eastern Chubu and Kanto regions, and western Japan (Koyama and Sugito, 1984).

The shell mounds in the Atsumi Peninsula area are characterized by an extremely large number of human burials. Most of these skeletons were excavated in the 1920s and became important materials for the early study of the origins of the modern Japanese (Kiyono, 1925, 1928). It is also notable that these sites revealed interesting ritual and burial customs such as tooth ablation practices, tooth filing, and squared-shaped bone-pile burial (banjo-shuseki-bo), spurring many archeological studies on the social organization and mortuary habits of the Jomon people (Harunari, 1979, 1986; Tanaka, 2001; Funahashi, 2008). Jomon people from the Final period, especially around eastern Japan, are thought to have had a transegalitarian society in which socioeconomic inequalities were recognized (Hayden, 1995; Takahashi, 2004). Watanabe (1990) proposed that occupational differentiation had appeared in the Jomon society, on the basis of an ethnographic comparison with recent sedentary hunter-gatherers. The presence of interfamilial occupational differentiation (hunting vs. fishing) of the Jomon people in the Atsumi Peninsula has been supported by carbon, nitrogen, and strontium isotope analyses (Kusaka et al., 2008, 2011), suggesting an increased social complexity in the Final Jomon period.

Hints for reconstructing past social structures can also be obtained from biodistance analysis, which employs phenotypic data as proxies for underlying genotypic variation to define relatedness or divergence between populations (Larsen, 1997, 2002). Interpopulation phenotypic variation is formed through genetic drift (human settlement, population growth/decline) and gene flow (human migration) (Lane and Sublett, 1972; Spence, 1974; Konigsberg and Buikstra, 1995; Stojanowski and Schillaci, 2006). Matsumura’s (2000) dental metric study on skeletal remains from four sites in the Atsumi Peninsula area (the Yoshigo, Inariyama, Ikawazu and Hobi shell mounds) revealed that most of the individuals from these four sites did not form clear site-specific clusters, although some individuals from a given site formed tight clusters, which might have reflected close kinship. This result raises two different possibilities. The first one is that genetically homogeneous populations had been dispersed in this area before the Late Jomon period. The second one is that local gene pools had not been totally homogenized but mutual human migration masked morphological distinction between populations.

Analysis of phenotypic variation alone cannot decide between these two possibilities. Kusaka et al. (2009, 2011) made distinctions between ‘locals’ and ‘immigrants’ in sub-samples of the Yoshigo and Inariyama populations by strontium isotope analysis of the tooth enamel. Strontium isotope analysis is an effective tool to reveal prehistoric human migration patterns (e.g. Ezzo et al., 1997; Price et al., 2002; Bentley et al., 2007; Knudson and Price, 2007; Montgomery et al., 2007). Tooth enamel records the Sr isotope ratio (87Sr/86Sr) in the environment where the person lived during the formative period of the tooth enamel, and undergoes little subsequent change. Therefore, when people migrate between geochemically contrasting residential areas, the Sr isotope signatures in the tooth enamel of immigrants are detectable (Bentley, 2006). In the Atsumi Peninsula area, the strontium isotope ratio exhibits little variation in each local area around the site, and large differences of regional strontium isotope ratio exist (Kusaka et al., 2009, 2011). Since the observed strontium isotope ratios in tooth enamel are sufficiently contrasted between locals and immigrants, immigrants of populations in the Atsumi Peninsula area can be successfully identified. Although the ‘local group’ determined by the strontium isotope ratio may include immigrants who came from a place with the same geochemical signature as the excavated site, these determinations help us to evaluate morphological similarity/dissimilarity between the local group and immigrants. Genetic variability among populations is affected by local demographic variables, an in particular by human migration patterns and frequencies. Recently, biodistance studies have been employed to reveal intrasite genetic variation (Buikstra et al., 1990; Stojanowski and Schillaci, 2006). This technique has been applied several times to Jomon populations (Kondo, 1994; Matsumura et al., 1996; Matsumura and Nishimoto, 1996) and has also been cross-checked against ancient DNA data (Shinoda et al., 1998; Adachi et al., 2003, 2006). Although the exact nature of genealogical relationships among individuals can be rarely specified without a priori knowledge, biodistance analysis can reveal relative relatedness among them (Stojanowski and Schillaci, 2006). If morphological distinction is not observed between the local and immigrant groups, a whole population in an area would in fact be genetically homogeneous. On the other hand, if any morphological distinction is found, this indicates that human migration between populations had not completely homogenized local gene pools.

The purpose of the present study is to reveal interpopulation genetic relationships in the Atsumi Peninsula area, by comparing dental metric variation to human migration based on strontium isotope analysis of Yoshigo and Inariyama Jomon skeletal remains. This study represents a synthesis of biological relationships within and between populations and archeological contexts to reconstruct the biocultural structure in the Atsumi Peninsula area, using information uniquely available from strontium isotope analysis.

Materials and Methods

The materials examined in this study consisted of human skeletal remains from the Yoshigo and Inariyama shell mounds in the Atsumi Peninsula area (Figure 1, Table 1). These skeletal series are housed in the Laboratory of Physical Anthropology, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University. The Yoshigo shell mound is located on the northern coast of the Atsumi Peninsula, Aichi Prefecture. In 1922, K. Kiyono excavated this site and recovered about 300 human skeletons (Kiyono, 1969). The formation of the Yoshigo site covers the later part of the Late Jomon period and the Final Jomon period (c. 3500–2300 BP), based on the chronology of pottery types (Yamanouchi, 1952). This chronology was confirmed by radiocarbon dating of human bone collagen (c. 3200–2800 cal BP; Kusaka et al., 2009). The Inariyama shell mound is located on the Toyohashi Plain, Aichi Prefecture. This site was also excavated in 1922, and about 60 human skeletons were recovered (Kiyono, 1969). The age of Inariyama is thought to be the middle and late part of the Final Jomon period (c. 2800–2300 BP) based on the chronology of pottery types. The radiocarbon dates of remains from the Inariyama shell mound have not been investigated. Age and sex, and the distinction between immigrant and local skeletal remains as well as cut-off values of local strontium isotope ratios are given in Kusaka et al. (2009, 2011). Figure 2 illustrates the strontium isotope ratios of tooth enamel of Yoshigo and Inariyama skeletal remains showing a distinction between locals and immigrants. Eight out of 24 individuals of Yoshigo and 3 out of 10 individuals of Inariyama were identified as immigrants (Figure 2).

Figure 1

Map of the study area showing the location of the Yoshigo and Inariyama shell mounds.

Table 1 Yoshigo and Inariyama human skeletal remains used in this study
Sample No. Sex Age at death Local vs. immigrant1 K-means clustering Individual location in Figure 3 Individual location in Figure 4
Yoshigo shell mound
280 Male Adolescent Local 4 Yoshigo2 Yoshigo2
302 Female Young adult Local 3 Yoshigo Yoshigo
310 Female Young adult Local 4 Yoshigo2 Yoshigo2
316 Male Young adult Immigrant 2 Outlier Yoshigo
333 Male Young adult Immigrant 1 Outlier Outlier
349 Male Young adult Immigrant 1 Outlier Outlier
352 Female Adolescent Local 2 Yoshigo2 Yoshigo2
363 Male Middle adult Immigrant 3 Yoshigo Yoshigo
375 Male Young adult Local 2 Yoshigo2 Yoshigo2
383 Male Middle adult Immigrant 3 Outlier Yoshigo
386 Male Young adult Local 3 Yoshigo Yoshigo
388 Male Young adult Local 2 Yoshigo2 Yoshigo
396 Male Young adult Local 2 Yoshigo Yoshigo
404 Female Adolescent Local 4 Yoshigo2 Yoshigo2
408 Female Adult Immigrant 4 Yoshigo2 Outlier
435 Male Young adult Local 2 Yoshigo2 Yoshigo2
460 Female Young adult Immigrant 2 Yoshigo Yoshigo
481 Male Middle adult Local 2 Yoshigo Yoshigo
488 Female Middle adult Immigrant 3 Yoshigo2 Yoshigo
509 Male Middle adult Local 3 Yoshigo Yoshigo
522 Female Young adult Local 2 Yoshigo2 Yoshigo
523 Female Young adult Local 2 Yoshigo2 Yoshigo2
540 Female Middle adult Local 2 Yoshigo Outlier
541 Female Young adult Local 2 Yoshigo Yoshigo
Inariyama shell mound
210 Unknown Adolescent Local 4 Inariyama Inariyama
217 Female Young adult Immigrant 2 Outlier3 Outlier3
224 Female Middle adult Local 4 Inariyama Inariyama
228 Female Adolescent Local 4 Inariyama Inariyama
231 Male Young adult Immigrant 2 Outlier Inariyama
232 Male Young adult Local 4 Inariyama Inariyama
236 Male Adolescent Local 4 Inariyama Inariyama
238 Male Young adult Local 4 Inariyama Inariyama
241 Male Middle adult Immigrant 2 Outlier3 Outlier3
251 Male Young adult Local 2 Inariyama Inariyama
1  Based on strontium isotope analysis (Kusaka et al., 2009, 2011).

2  And also included in dental distribution for Inariyama locals.

3  And also included in dental distribution for Yoshigo locals.

Figure 2

Strontium isotope ratios of Yoshigo and Inariyama individuals. The gray horizontal range indicates the local range for Yoshigo (0.7086–0.7092) and Inariyama (0.7091–0.7100). The value of No. 231 (0.7066) was changed to reduce the scale. Data from Kusaka et al. (2009, 2011).

Dental crown metrics have been favored for use in biodistance analysis (e.g. Larsen, 1997; Pietrusewsky, 2000; Stojanowski and Schillaci, 2006) because of the moderate to high degree of heritability (Kieser, 1990; Scott, 1991; Dempsey and Townsend, 2001), absence of remodeling after crown completion, and generally better preservation of the crown (Hillson, 1996; Scott and Turner, 1997). All of the dental measurements used in this study were collected by one of the authors (W.M.), using digital calipers. Mesiodistal (MD) and buccolingual (BL) measurements were made following the methodology of Fujita (1949). Basically, measurements of the right teeth were used for statistical analyses. However, when the right side tooth was missing, measurements from the left antimere were substituted. Any dental measurement that was potentially affected by dental wear, calculus, and caries was treated as missing data. To ensure accuracy, each measurement was made three times, and its mean value was used. The multivariate analyses require a complete data set for each individual, but this is a hard condition to fulfill for Jomon samples because of heavy attrition, tooth ablation, dental caries, and so on. After testing for normality for each measurement, we removed individuals for which too few measurements were available, and measurements which were taken on too few individuals from the data set to achieve a good balance between the number of samples and that of variables in a stepwise fashion. Finally, we used eight measurements (UP2MD, UP2BL, UM1MD, UM1BL, LP2MD, LP2BL, LM1MD, and LM1BL) from 34 individuals (Table 2).

Table 2 Mean and standard deviation of the dataset
UP2MD UP2BL UM1MD UM1BL LP2MD LP2BL LM1MD LM1BL
Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD
Yoshigo 6.46 0.35 8.97 0.56 10.15 0.50 11.95 0.50 6.92 0.42 8.26 0.50 11.55 0.51 11.12 0.48
Inariyama 6.58 0.28 8.88 0.25 10.32 0.47 11.59 0.37 7.07 0.40 8.40 0.44 11.64 0.49 11.22 0.65
Total 6.49 0.33 8.94 0.49 10.20 0.49 11.84 0.49 6.97 0.41 8.30 0.48 11.57 0.50 11.15 0.52

Before using univariate and multivariate statistical methods, all measurements were size-standardized by a Q-mode correction whereby each dental measurement was divided by the geometric mean for all the measurements for each individual in the sample (Corruccini, 1973; Darroch and Mosimann, 1985; Powell and Neves, 1999; Scherer, 2007; Temple et al., 2011). To eliminate sex-related size variation while retaining shape variation, geometric means were derived by multiplying together all the variables for each individual and calculating the nth root of this product (n = number of variables for the individual).

Firstly, to examine the association between dental metric variation and the difference of the childhood home based on strontium isotope ratio, all samples were divided into four clusters by K-means clustering of dental measurements (Hartigan and Wong, 1979). Then, these four clusters were fitted to four groups: Yoshigo immigrant, Yoshigo local, Inariyama immigrant, and Inariyama local. The significance of the deviation from a null hypothesis consisting of the absence of contingency between them was evaluated by Fisher’s exact test (α = 0.05) since the sample size was small.

Secondly, principal component analysis (PCA) was carried out using size-standardized dental measurements, to examine patterns of phenotypic variability between immigrants and locals based on a human migration model. The principal components (PCs) are ranked by the amount of the total variance that each of them explains. PCA can then be used as a data reduction technique that generates new variables from the original datasets. Individuals that occupy a similar space in the PCA plots are morphologically similar and are considered to be, to some degree, genetically similar because phenotypic covariance, which was calculated from standardized variables for all specimens in the present study, is related to genetic covariance (Chevrud, 1988; Williams-Blangero and Blangero, 1989). After plotting all samples by the first two or three PCA scores, we determined 95% confidence ellipses of Yoshigo and Inariyama locals using a principal axis method (Sokal and Rohlf, 1995). This method allowed us to assess whether or not immigrants of each site fell within the range of local dental variations. The results of this method were compared with the estimation of the childhood home based on the strontium isotope data.

If immigrants had originated from multiple populations, the variance of immigrants would be larger than that of locals. To estimate the difference of phenotypic variability between immigrants and locals, both univariate and multivariate data analyses were conducted. For each Q-mode transformed dental metric variable, the difference of within-group variance between immigrants and locals was tested using a univariate F-test (Manly, 1994). Before the F-test, normality was confirmed by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test (α = 0.05). Due to the small sample size, we bootstrapped the sample standard deviations to obtain bias-free estimates of variance (Efron, 1981). The F-test was conducted using variances for all bias-corrected variables.

For multivariate data analysis, the determinant of the variance–covariance matrix was calculated (Green, 1976; Konigsberg, 1988; Schillaci and Stojanowski, 2003). Pairwise determinant ratios between immigrants and locals were evaluated for statistical significance, using a nonparametric bootstrap method (Petersen, 2000). The data were resampled (9999 iterations) after random shuffling with sizes equal to the original sample sizes to generate a randomized distribution of determinant ratio values. The P-value was calculated by dividing the number of resampled values greater than or equal to the observed determinant ratio plus one by the number of resamplings plus one (Manly, 1997; Petersen, 2000). The ratio of determinants is supposed to be one when equal mobility between the two groups exists (Konigsberg, 1988). When a numerator group is more mobile, the determinant ratio is positive, and vice versa. In this procedure, to avoid generating singular variance–covariance matrices, the number of variables is limited to n – 1, where n is the sample size of the smallest group. The number of Yoshigo immigrants (n = 8), Inariyama immigrants (n = 3), and locals (n = 7) were equal to or less than that of the eight variables. Then, variable reduction was achieved using a PCA method within Yoshigo and Inariyama samples, respectively. In the case of Yoshigo, the first seven PCA scores, which contributed to 99.9% of the total variance, were utilized for the determinant ratio analysis. In the case of Inariyama, the first two PCA scores, which contributed to 68.8% of the total variance, were used for the determinant ratio analysis. All statistical analyses were carried out using R.2.9.1 (R Development Core Team, 2009).

Results

The classification of individuals derived from K-means clustering is presented in Table 1. Contingency tables between four clusters of dental measurements and four groups based on strontium isotope analysis are presented in Table 3. The results of Fisher’s exact test showed that human migration significantly deviated from the null hypothesis (P = 0.004). This finding suggests that the dental metric variation of Yoshigo and Inariyama skeletal remains is significantly explained by human migration among populations in the Atsumi Peninsula area. Thus, human migration between populations had not completely homogenized local gene pools and most of immigrants who had come from other population had different genetic backgrounds from the locals.

Table 3 Four by four contingency table consisting of four clusters derived from K-means clustering and four groups based on strontium isotope analysis
Cluster 1 Cluster 2 Cluster 3 Cluster 4 Total
Yoshigo immigrant 2 2 3 1 8
Yoshigo local 0 10 3 3 16
Inariyama immigrant 0 3 0 0 3
Inariyama local 0 1 0 6 7
Total 2 16 6 10 34

Fisher’s exact test, P = 0.004.

The plot of the first three PC scores for the eight variables across all samples is presented in Figure 3 and Figure 4. The first three PCs have eigenvalues greater than 1.0 and account for 74.1% of the total variance. Figure 3 and Figure 4 show a general trend that immigrants had larger variability and locals had smaller variability. In Figure 3, four out of eight Yoshigo immigrants (Nos. 316, 333, 349, and 383) and all of the Inariyama immigrants (Nos. 217, 231, and 241) fell outside the 95% confidence ellipse of each local group. Two of the Yoshigo immigrants (Nos. 408 and 488) and two of the Inariyama immigrants (Nos. 217 and 241) were plotted in the confidence ellipses for the Inariyama and Yoshigo local groups, respectively. In Figure 4, three of the Yoshigo immigrants (Nos. 333, 349, and 408) and two Inariyama immigrants (Nos. 217 and 241) exhibited dental profiles that were beyond the confidence ellipses for the each local group. These two Inariyama immigrants were also fitted well within the dental distribution of the Yoshigo local group. Additionally, one local of Yoshigo (No. 540) was far apart from the confidence ellipses for the other Yoshigo locals. In total, 8 out of 11 immigrants were beyond the respective local dental profile for the first three PC scores.

Figure 3

First and second principal components plot of all samples and 95% confidence ellipses for Yoshigo and Inariyama locals using eight Q-mode corrected variables.

Figure 4

First and third principal components plot of all samples and 95% confidence ellipses for Yoshigo and Inariyama locals using eight Q-mode corrected variables.

The results of bootstrapped estimates of standard deviations and F-test P-values for the Yoshigo population between the immigrants and the locals are presented in Table 4. The immigrants exhibit larger standard deviations for six out of eight variables, and two of these differences were statistically significant. Although it was not true for all of the variables, a general trend of greater immigrant variance was indicated by larger bias-corrected standard deviations for the majority of variables.

Table 4 Univariate variance tests for Yoshigo population
Variable Immigrant (n = 8) Local (n = 16) F-value P-value
SD Boot Bias SD Boot Bias
UP2MD 0.040 0.037 0.003 0.025 0.024 0.001 2.43 0.070
UP2BL 0.074 0.070 0.004 0.032 0.032 0.000 5.06 0.004 **
UM1MD 0.039 0.037 0.002 0.042 0.041 0.001 1.24 0.404
UM1BL 0.040 0.037 0.003 0.030 0.029 0.001 1.61 0.207
LP2MD 0.038 0.036 0.002 0.024 0.024 0.001 2.20 0.095
LP2BL 0.037 0.034 0.003 0.031 0.030 0.001 1.34 0.300
LM1MD 0.034 0.032 0.002 0.039 0.038 0.001 1.39 0.341
LM1BL 0.066 0.062 0.004 0.023 0.023 0.001 7.53 0.001 **

The assumption that variables were normally distributed for both immigrants and locals was examined using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test (α = 0.05) after standardization by Q-mode correction. The greater standard deviation is identified in bold. SD, standard deviation; Boot, bootstrapped standard deviation; Bias, estimated bias for uncorrected standard deviation. Significance level:

*  5%;

**  1%;

***  0.1%.

The bootstrapped estimates of the within-group standard deviations and F-test P-values for the Inariyama population between the immigrants and the locals are presented in Table 5. The greater immigrant variability was also indicated by the larger standard deviations for six out of eight variables, with three of them significant. Larger variability was also observed in Inariyama immigrants.

Table 5 Univariate variance tests for Inariyama population
Variable Immigrant (n = 3) Local (n = 9) F-value P-value
SD Boot Bias SD Boot Bias
UP2MD 0.038 0.031 0.007 0.010 0.010 0.001 10.40 0.006 **
UP2BL 0.036 0.029 0.007 0.020 0.018 0.001 2.52 0.141
UM1MD 0.027 0.022 0.005 0.034 0.032 0.003 2.06 0.368
UM1BL 0.050 0.041 0.009 0.023 0.021 0.002 3.70 0.073
LP2MD 0.044 0.036 0.008 0.017 0.016 0.001 4.88 0.041 *
LP2BL 0.017 0.014 0.003 0.020 0.018 0.002 1.76 0.412
LM1MD 0.052 0.042 0.009 0.009 0.008 0.001 25.11 0.000 ***
LM1BL 0.038 0.031 0.007 0.028 0.026 0.002 1.39 0.303

The assumption that variables were normally distributed for both immigrants and locals was examined using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test (α = 0.05) after standardization by Q-mode correction. The greater standard deviation is identified in bold. SD, standard deviation; Boot, bootstrapped standard deviation; Bias, estimated bias for uncorrected standard deviation. Significance level:

*  5%;

**  1%;

***  0.1%.

Table 6 shows the results of determinant ratio analysis as a means of multivariate evaluation of within-group variation between immigrants and locals. The determinant of the variance–covariance matrix could be utilized as a generalized variance measure (Green, 1976). Generally, a population with a greater number of immigrants will show a large determinant. It was expected that the immigrant group would have a larger determinant than its local group, and the determinant ratio between immigrants and locals exceeds 1.0.

Table 6 Determinant ratios and randomization P-values
Population |C Immigrant |/|C Local | Randomization P-value
Yoshigo 4.77 0.012*
Inariyama 172.95 0.005**

Significance level:

*  5%;

**  1%;

***  0.1%.

The randomization probability indicated a significant departure from a determinant ratio of 1 at the α = 0.05 level for the Yoshigo shell mounds. In the case of Inariyama, the determinant ratio exceeded 1.0, and resampling analysis also found a significant difference in the amount of variability between the immigrants and the locals. It is concluded that the local group had quite small diversity relative to the immigrant group in both populations (Figure 3, Figure 4).

Most of the immigrants were excluded from the confidence ellipses of local variation, and the variances of immigrants were significantly larger than those of locals, suggesting that immigrants came from multiple groups which were genetically segregated from each other.

Discussion

This study attempted to clarify interpopulation genetic relationships in the Jomon Atsumi Peninsula area by comparing dental morphological variation and human migration patterns. The results of correlation tests revealed that dental metric variations in the Yoshigo and Inariyama shell mounds were significantly associated with the distinction between immigrants and locals determined from the strontium isotope ratio of third molar enamel. This result suggested regional genetic heterogeneity among local populations in the Atsumi Peninsula area. Matsumura’s (2000) dental metric study on skeletal remains from four sites in the Atsumi Peninsula area revealed that most individuals from these four sites did not form clear site-specific clusters. The results of the present study, however, suggest that the local gene pools had not been totally homogenized but mutual human migration between populations masked morphological distinction.

Excavated human remains may be an aggregate of individuals who lived at different times during the formation of the sites (Pietrusewsky, 2000; Stojanowski and Schillaci, 2006). In fact, most of the sites in the Atsumi Peninsula were formed from the later part of the Late Jomon period to the Final Jomon period (c. 3500–2300 BP), and both the Yoshigo and Inariyama shell mounds span several hundred years (Yamanouchi, 1952; Sugihara and Toyama, 1964; Kusaka et al., 2009). Observed biological variation can be changed through temporal processes (Owsley et al., 1982; Konigsberg, 1990a, b; Stojanowski, 2003, 2004, 2005a, b). However, the results of the present study indicated that human migration caused intrasite dental variation in the Atsumi Peninsula area. Since immigrants identified by strontium isotope ratio were first-generation individuals who had migrated from other populations, and the proportion of immigrants was 20–30% (Kusaka et al., 2009, 2011), the temporal process of biological variation would be less prominent here than the effect of human migration.

PCA showed that five out of eight Yoshigo immigrants and all of the Inariyama immigrants were plotted outside of the confidence ellipses of each local variation. Overall, the immigrants were scattering more broadly than the locals and the distributions of them were not skewed in either the Yoshigo and Inariyama populations, suggesting that the immigrants did not share a common dental morphology. Furthermore, No. 540 was an outlier of the local Yoshigo distribution (Figure 4). Kusaka et al. (2009) raised the possibility that this individual, with a strontium isotope ratio close to the low end of the local variation, might actually have been an immigrant from the eastern inland area. The dental profile of No. 540, which was beyond the Yoshigo local dental distribution, would support this possibility.

All three Inariyama immigrants were outliers from the local dental variation. In the case of Inariyama, the local variation is small and outliers are more clearly identified. In this study, human migration based on isotope ratio was significantly associated with dental variation, and local individuals showed close morphological similarities each other in the PCA plots. Low dental variability of the Inariyama local population relative to the Yoshigo locals might be explained from either a greater effect of migration due to the longer existence of the Yoshigo shell mound, or a presence of a greater number of hidden immigrants. In any case, it is concluded that Inariyama locals showed relatively high genetic similarity among their small population.

The evaluation of dental variability in the local and immigrant groups suggests multiple origins of the immigrants. The results of the univariate analyses of between immigrants and locals within the Yoshigo and Inariyama shell mounds revealed a tendency of greater immigrant variation. The multivariate determinant ratio analyses also seemed to support these univariate results in both of the sites. It is important to note that those immigrants did not share a common dental morphology according to the PCA, and that the variance of the immigrants was significantly larger than that of the locals in both univariate and multivariate variance comparisons. This suggested that these immigrants had come from multiple parent populations, and these genetically distinct groups interacted with each other within and outside the Atsumi Peninsula area.

In general, migration among demes is considered to retard genetic differentiation. Therefore, the regional heterogeneity among the populations observed in the present study might have been caused by a lack of frequent interaction, insufficient duration for genetic admixture, or both. Regional genetic variation is expected to be high when local populations are relatively non-mobile and interpopulation gene flow is restricted due to geographical or social/cultural barriers. However, it seems unlikely that there were such barriers or infrequent gene flow in the relatively narrow Atsumi Peninsula area. In relatively small-scale, low-density, and kin-based societies where families migrate frequently, such as the Yanomamo of South America or the Semai of Malaysia, it has been shown that kin-structured migration increases genetic variation among populations (Fix, 1975, 1978, 1999, 2004; Smouse et al., 1981). Groups of kin hive off from local settlements to fuse with another population or establish new settlements of their own. Such a migrant group shares similar genotypes leading to biological relatedness, so that kin-structured migration can affect gene frequencies of both donor and recipient populations in smaller societies (Fix, 2004). Williams-Blangero (1989a, b) and Williams-Blangero and Blangero (1989) also found significant anthropometric microdifferentiaion between villages of the Jirel of Nepal despite migration among them, which might have been caused by nonrandom marital migration (clan-structured migration) related to kin-structured migration. It is conceivable that a similar mechanism has worked to establish microdifferentiation among the Jomon populations in the Atsumi Peninsula area. Interpopulation differentiation caused by nonrandom kin-structured migration can be seen in not only the Yanomamo and the Semai, which depend on swidden gardens for subsistence (Dentan, 1968; Neel, 1978; Fix, 1999), but also the Jirel, which is a settled agriculturalist population living in a restricted region (Bista, 1996). Although it is uncertain to what extent these populations are analogous to the Jomon people, who were sedentary hunter-gatherers, microdifferentiation among populations would result from nonrandom kin-structured migration upon marriage, and/or for fusing another groups or establishing new settlements. Jomon people in the Atsumi Peninsula area might have had a social organization in which kinship played a major role as social glue.

In the Jomon period, there were two periods of climatic cooling (Sakaguchi, 1989; Umitsu, 1994). The second cooling and fall of the sea level occurred during the Final Jomon period (Izeki, 1974; Ota et al., 1982, 1990; Umitsu, 1994), leading to a further reduction of the Jomon population throughout most of the Japanese archipelago (Koyama, 1978; Koyama and Sugito, 1984). However, in Aichi prefecture, the number and scale of the sites increased from the Late to Final Jomon period (Koyama, 1978). Settlements in the Atsumi Peninsula area might have benefited from access to shellfish in tidelands after the marine regression (Masuko, 1980; Iwase, 1991). In contrast, in the western part of the Aichi prefecture (Owari region) traces of human activity markedly decreased, suggesting a drastic population decline (Koumura, 1981; Masuko, 2001, 2006). These demographic changes may suggest population movements to the Atsumi Peninsula area from neighboring areas (Masuko, 1980). Immigrants identified by strontium isotope analysis were members of the first generation who had migrated from distinct populations, and their genetic traits were different from those of each other and those of local populations. The parent populations of most of immigrants analyzed in the present study had not been included in the gene pools of each local population which had until then been constituted by interaction with other populations. Several researchers have suggested the possibilities that extraregional gene flow and migration, and/or population aggregation increased intracemetery heterogeneity (Key and Jantz, 1990; Griffin et al., 2001; Stojanowski, 2003, 2005b; Schillaci and Stojanowski, 2005). The present study could not verify the temporal change of genetic variation, and it may be conceivable that relatively high intrapopulation relatedness and migration among the surrounding and extraregional populations had occurred without environmental change. However, the biological and archeological findings here suggest that not only extraregional gene flow, but also the population aggregation from the surrounding areas associated with the climatic change of the Late to the Final Jomon period might have caused multiple genetically distinct populations to congregate in the Atsumi Peninsula area.

Conclusion

We investigated whether interpopulation genetic relationships in the Jomon Atsumi Peninsula area were homogeneous or heterogeneous, by combining dental metric and strontium isotope data about migratory patterns to investigate the population structure of the prehistoric society. The results showed that human migration patterns based on strontium isotope analysis were significantly correlated with dental metric variation, suggesting regional genetic heterogeneity between local populations. Although the difference of childhood home of Yoshigo and Inariyama individuals based on strontium isotope analysis did not completely correspond with the dental variability from PCA, at least 8 of 11 identified immigrants exhibited dental profiles atypical of each local variation. The variances of the immigrants were significantly larger than those of the locals, suggesting multiple origins of the immigrants. Microdifferentiation among populations in this area would have resulted from nonrandom kin-structured migration in the relatively small-scale, low-density, and kin-based societies as seen in the Yanomamo, the Semai or the Jirel populations, and/or population aggregation from surrounding areas in accordance with climatic change in the Final Jomon period.

We found regional heterogeneity among Jomon populations in the Atsumi Peninsula area, and reconstructed population dynamics in a temporally constrained small region by means of combination analysis of the spatial variance of childhood home based on strontium isotope analysis and phenotypic variance as a proxy for genetic variation, with full consideration of the archeological context. This study shows the usefulness of combining the phenotypic approach and geochemical methods for the reconstruction of prehistoric human societies in more detail.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank to Professor Emeritus K. Katayama (Kyoto University), and members of the Laboratory of Physical Anthropology, Kyoto University for helpful discussions and comments, and especially to C. Ramos for correcting the manuscript. We also thank Dr T. Nagaoka (St. Marianna University School of Medicine) and Prof. T. Hanihara (Kitasato University School of Medicine), for their thoughtful advice and comments on this study. Finally, we would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and positive criticisms of our original manuscript. This study was supported in part by the Global COE Program A06 to Kyoto University.

References
 
© 2012 The Anthropological Society of Nippon
feedback
Top