The Journal of Biochemistry
Online ISSN : 1756-2651
Print ISSN : 0021-924X
Stability of the C-Terminal α-Helical Domain of Bacteriorhodopsin That Protrudes from the Membrane Surface, as Studied by High-Resolution Solid-State 13C NMR
Satoru YamaguchiSatoru TuziToshizo SekiMichikazu TanioRichard NeedlemanJanos K. LanyiAkira NaitoHazime Saitô
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

1998 Volume 123 Issue 1 Pages 78-86

Details
Abstract

We have recorded 13C NMR spectra of [1-13C]Ala- and [3-13C] Ala-bacteriorhodopsin (bR), [1-13C] Ala- and [3-13C] Ala-papain-cleaved bR, and [3-13C]Ala-labeled R227Q bR mutant by cross polarization-magic angle spinning (CP-MAS) and dipolar decoupled-magic angle spinning (DD-MAS) methods. The pH and temperature were varied, and Arg 227 was replaced with Gln (R227Q), in order to clarify their effects on the stability of the α-helical domain of the C-terminus that protrudes from the membrane surface. The comparative 13C CP- and DD-MAS NMR study of [3-13C] Ala-bR, rather than [1-13C] Ala-bR, turned out to be the best means to distinguish the 13C NMR signals of the C-terminus from those of the rest of the transmembrane helices or loops. The inner segment of the C-terminus, from Ala 228 to Ala 235, forms an α-helical domain (resonated at 15.9 ppm) either at neutral pH and/or at 10 to -10°C. The α-helical peak was not seen, however, after either cleavage of the C-terminus with papain or lowering the pH to 4.25. This a-helical structure, and a part of the random coil which was produced from the helix at pH 4.25, were further converted to a low-temperature-type α-helix, as indicated by an upfield displacement of the 13C NMR signal, when the temperature was lowered to 10--10°C. Surprisingly, the corresponding helical structure in R227Q is more stable than in the wild type at the acidic pH. This α-helical peak was classified as an α_??_-helix from the 13C chemical shifts of Cβ carbon, although it was ascribed to an α1-helix on the basis of the carbonyl shifts. This is in contrast to Ala 53 which adopts the α11helix as judged from the 13C chemical shifts of Cβ and the carbonyl carbons. Therefore, this discrepancy might be caused by differential sensitivity of the two types of carbon signals to conformation and to modes of hydrogen bonding when motional fluctuation is involved. It is likely that the α11-helix form present at the C-terminus is not always the type originally proposed but should be considered as a form undergoing large-amplitude conformational fluctuation around α-helix.

Content from these authors
© The Japanese Biochemical Society
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top