Environmental Monitoring and Contaminants Research
Online ISSN : 2435-7685
Status Reports
Overview of PCB Pollution in Africa: E-Waste and Insights from International Pellet Watch
Mona ALIDOUST Hideshige TAKADAKaoruko MIZUKAWA
Author information
JOURNAL OPEN ACCESS FULL-TEXT HTML

2024 Volume 4 Pages 75-94

Details
ABSTRACT

In this paper, literature from the last decade concerning the environmental levels of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in Africa is reviewed. Although data to determine general trends of PCBs across African countries were insufficient, high levels were observed in environmental and biological samples from some urban and industrial areas near electronic waste (e-waste) sites in Ghana, South Africa and Nigeria, in comparison to those in rural settings. Notably, atmospheric PCB concentrations showed a slow rate of decrease, particularly in a 10-year monitoring program (2008–2019), in which PCB levels ranged from 0.5 to 37.7 pg/m3, whereas more rapid decreases were observed in other areas globally. PCB levels in plastic resin pellets, which reflect pollution in coastal waters, in some African countries, namely, Tunisia and Senegal (554–3,384 ng/g-pellet, respectively), were comparable with, or slightly higher than, those in developed countries, i.e., the United States and France (178 and 2,230 ng/g-pellet, respectively). Nevertheless, due to inconsistent monitoring methods and limited data availability, temporal trends were still unclear. Improperly disposed PCB-containing equipment, like electrical transformers and capacitors, informal recycling and open burning of e-waste are significant contributors of PCBs in Africa. Even though there is no known PCB production in the region, the contamination levels mirror those in historically heavy-use areas, largely due to electrical equipment and inadequate e-waste handling practices. The understanding of temporal trends is hindered by the current gaps in data, which highlights that comprehensive monitoring and effective enforcement of global treaties such as the Stockholm Convention and the Basel Convention are urgently needed. To understand better and address the pervasive impact of PCBs in Africa, this review calls for sustained monitoring with follow-up intervals.

INTRODUCTION

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are synthetic persistent organic pollutants (POPs) encompassing 209 congeners, each with distinct physical and chemical properties. Massively produced from the 1950s to the 1970s in industrialised countries such as the United States, France and Japan, the cumulative global production of PCBs reached approximately 1.3 million tonnes, of which approximately 97% were used in the Northern Hemisphere (Breivik et al., 2007). Their widespread utilization was driven by their excellent dielectric and heat transfer properties, making them indispensable in electrical equipment, particularly transformers and capacitors. However, owing to their toxicity, environmental persistence and propensity for bioaccumulation and biomagnification, PCB production was halted first in Japan in 1972 and then in the United States in 1977 and in other countries in 1993, which was then subjected to stringent regulations and banned or restricted under the Stockholm Convention and associated legislation (UNEP, 2001).

Despite these regulatory measures, PCBs continue to pose significant environmental challenges, particularly because of their long-range transport and transboundary movement through various means, which include the trade and disposal of electronic equipment that contains PCBs (Pozo et al., 2006). This has led to the presence of PCBs in regions where they were never produced, underscoring the need for comprehensive monitoring to determine and mitigate their sources.

The Stockholm Convention, established in 2001 and enforced in 2004, was a pivotal global agreement aimed at protecting human health and the environment from the adverse effects of POPs, including PCBs. Monitoring and regulatory efforts under the Convention have led to a decrease in PCB emissions in former-use regions; nonetheless, high levels of PCBs have recently been recorded in various parts of the world (Gioia et al., 2014). Transformer oils predominantly use PCBs, constituting 48% of their applications, whereas capacitors and open applications such as paints and sealants each comprised roughly 21%. Other enclosed uses accounted for 10% of PCB applications (Akinrinade et al., 2024).

In Africa, the major environmental PCB sources are transformer oil leakages, with other applications resulting in minimal emissions due to high costs. There is a lack of detailed import/export data and contamination assessments, which complicates the management of PCBs. Older transformers, pre-1986, are often contaminated, and transformer oils are sometimes misused as coolants or adulterated diesel (Debela et al., 2022). In Africa, data on non-Aroclor PCB sources are limited.

Numerous African countries imported significant quantities of PCB-containing equipment before the global ban, which resulted in substantial stockpiles and contaminated sites (Akinrinade et al., 2023). For instance, Eritrea and Congo imported thousands of transformers and capacitors, which have contributed to widespread PCB contamination (Debela et al., 2022). Additionally, informal recycling and disposal practices, such as open-air burning, have exacerbated PCB pollution, releasing these harmful chemicals into the environment (UNEP, 2010). This issue is compounded by Africa’s growing electronic waste (e-waste) crisis, which was driven by rapid technological adoption and insufficient waste management systems (Maphosa et al., 2020). Africa generates significant e-waste, with 2.2 million tonnes produced in 2016. The countries with the largest contributions are Egypt (0.5 Mt), South Africa and Algeria (0.3 Mt each) (Baldé et al., 2015). The average annual per capita e-waste generation in Africa is 1.9 kg, which is remarkably lower than those in Europe (16.6 kg) and the Americas (11.6 kg) (Baldé et al., 2017). However, locally generated e-waste is projected to increase considerably, and illegal transboundary imports from developed countries have remarkably increased, further exacerbating the problem (SBC, 2011; Bello et al., 2016). Reportedly, 80% of e-waste generated worldwide has been treated informally (Balde et al., 2017), especially in developing countries of Asia and Africa (Breivik et al., 2014), including Accra, Ghana (Wittsiepe et al., 2015; Tue et al., 2019); Delhi, India (Chakraborty et al., 2019); Lagos, Nigeria (Iwegbue et al., 2019); and Trang Minh and Bui Dau, Vietnam (Tue et al., 2010).

The International Pellet Watch (IPW) program has been instrumental in monitoring the global distribution of POPs, including PCBs. This program analyzes plastic resin pellets collected from beaches worldwide to assess the levels and sources of PCBs and other contaminants. Studies have shown that PCB concentrations in Africa vary considerably, with higher levels often found near urban and industrial areas. For instance, monitoring in Ghana has revealed elevated PCB concentrations in coastal waters and sediments, particularly near e-waste recycling sites (Hosoda et al., 2014). In this review, an overview of PCB pollution in Africa is provided, focusing on the findings from the IPW program. Moreover, this review aims to summarize PCB levels in environmental and biological matrices within African environments over the past decades, address critical areas of concern and highlight research gaps. By integrating the data from numerous studies and monitoring programs, this review seeks to offer a comprehensive understanding of the current state of PCB pollution in Africa and its environmental implications.

METHODS

The data for this review were compiled from peer-reviewed research articles indexed in the Web of Science, Google Scholar and Scopus databases. The search, spanning publications over the period from 2014 to 2024, utilized keywords such as ‘polychlorinated biphenyls’ (or ‘PCBs’), ‘Africa’, ‘sediment’, ‘water’, ‘biota’, ‘air’, ‘atmosphere’, ‘microplastics’, ‘e-waste’ and ‘e-waste management’, alongside names of various African countries. The initial search yielded 171 documents. The inclusion criteria focused on peer-reviewed articles that were published within the specified timeframe, were available in English and provided relevant data on PCBs or e-waste in Africa. Following a detailed screening process, 97 articles met these criteria and were selected for inclusion in this review. This selection process ensured that only the most relevant sources were included, enabling a comprehensive overview of PCB and e-waste pollution across Africa.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

PCB POLLUTION STATUS ACROSS AFRICA THROUGH IPW

Despite international bans, PCBs continue to present significant environmental and public health threats worldwide. Reportedly, there is no African country with a history of manufacturing PCBs. African countries have imported numerous pieces of electrical equipment containing PCBs, primarily from Europe, America and Asia (Debela et al., 2022). The importation and continued use of pre-1980 equipment, which are often poorly managed, are likely a major contributor to PCB pollution in the region. These devices, containing PCBs, were not phased out in numerous African countries, which led to ongoing environmental contamination and contributed to the PCB burden in these regions (UNEP, 2010). However, the common sources of PCBs in the African environment include unintentional use in industries such as paint manufacturing (Anh et al., 2021), leakage from electrical transformers, contaminated sites and the disposal and recycling of e-waste, especially at open burning sites (Ssebugere et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2023).

IPW has been pivotal in monitoring global PCB levels through the analysis of beached plastic pellets, providing valuable data on pollution trends and levels. In this monitoring plan contributors across the globe send pellets to IPW, where 13 PCB congeners are reported; Σ13 PCBs represent the sum of these congeners (PCBs-66, 101, 110, 149, 118, 105, 153, 138, 128, 187, 180, 170 and 206). Although piece-to-piece variation in PCB concentrations among the pellets from the same beaches, by using the median value from five subsamples, IPW categorises the concentration of PCBs into different pollution levels and has developed a comprehensive global database of PCB values (Endo et al., 2005; Ogata et al., 2009). Notably, Ogata et al. (2009) documented that this median correlates well with concentrations found in mussels, as observed by Mussel Watch, a monitoring program established in the 1970s (Ogata et al., 2009; Takada and Yamashita, 2016). Thus, PCBs in pellets reflect the pollution levels of PCBs in coastal waters from which the pellets were collected.

In a series of global studies carried out by IPW researchers between 2011 and 2021, a total of 247 locations worldwide, including 43 along the African coastline, were monitored, and PCB concentrations were reported (Fig. 1 and Table 1). They established the global background level of PCBs at 10 ng/g-pellet, above which any local or regional sources of PCBs are suspected. They also proposed and utilised five-level categories of PCB concentrations reflecting the magnitude of local PCBs sources, that is, extremely polluted, >500 ng/g-pellet; highly polluted, >200 ng/g-pellet; moderately polluted, >50 ng/g-pellet; lightly polluted >10 ng/g-pellet; and non-local pollution, <10 ng/g-pellet. Extreme and high pollution levels were observed in industrialised coastal regions of western Europe, the United States, Japan and Australia, and they were ascribed to legacy pollution.

Fig. 1 Median PCB concentrations in plastic resin pellets worldwide (ng/g-pellet) IPW monitoring data during 2011–2021.

Values are the sum of 13 congeners: PCBs-66, 101, 110, 149, 118, 105, 153, 138, 128, 187, 180, 170 and 206. The PCB concentrations were categorized into five pollution levels. The categories are as follows: <10 ng/g-pellet=non-locally polluted, 10–50 ng/g-pellet=lightly polluted, 50–200 ng/g-pellet=moderately polluted, 200–500 ng/g-pellet=highly polluted and >500 ng/g-pellet=extremely polluted (data obtained from Karapanagioti et al., 2011; Heskett et al., 2012; Ryan et al., 2012; Mizukawa et al., 2013; Hosoda et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2015; Yeo et al., 2015; Le et al., 2016; Alidoust et al., 2021; Karlsson et al., 2021; Ohgaki et al., 2021).

Table 1 Median PCB concentration (ng/g-pellet) in plastic resin pellets in Africa and around the world (2011–2021) in previous studies

CountrySampling YearΣ13 PCBs* (ng/g- pellet)N**Refrence
North America
New Jersey20114322Ohgaki et al. (2021)
California20103.8–426Van et al. (2012)
Los Angeles, California20122331Ohgaki et al. (2021)
California2018233
San Francisco20121781
San Francisco20161041
Texas2014451
Texas201971Karlsson et al. (2021)
Latin America
Argentina20080.912Ohgaki et al. (2021)
Chile20081.21
São Paulo, Brazil2010n.d.–12.7556Taniguchi et al. (2016)
Brazil2012611Ohgaki et al. (2021)
Belize20132.61
Puerto Rico20163011
Argentina2019101Karlsson et al. (2021)
Costa Rica2019181
Jamaica2019271
Mexico2019161
Africa
South Africa201116–1139Ryan et al. (2012)
South Africa2012–201396–1222Ohgaki et al. (2021)
Kenya2011191
Kenya201941Karlsson et al. (2021)
Guinea2014581Ohgaki et al. (2021)
Ghana2009–20131–6911Hosoda et al. (2014)
Guinea2019841Karlsson et al. (2021)
Ghana2010–20158.8–1436Ohgaki et al. (2021)
Mozambique2013531
Morocco20191551Karlsson et al. (2021)
Nigeria2019181
Republic of Congo20191041
Senegal20193,3841
Tanzania20192171
Tunisia20195541
Tunisia202014–6324Barhoumi et al., (2023)
Europe
Greece20085–2304Karapanagioti et al. (2011)
Portuguese coast2008–201210–31010Mizukawa et al. (2013)
France2010–201796–2,2304Ohgaki et al. (2021)
Spain2014–2015107–1,2432
Netherlands20142431
Italy2014461
Poland2019131Karlsson et al. (2021)
Turkey201991
Middle East
UAE201021Alidoust et al. (2021)
Qatar2015231
Iran20180.01–62419
Asia
Vietnam2007–20144–244Le et al. (2016)
Vietnam201921Karlsson et al. (2021)
India2007–2017671–4733Ohgaki et al. (2021)
China2009–20142.7–2992
China201421.5–2322Zhang et al. (2015)
Malaysia2011–20160.15–213Ohgaki et al. (2021)
Japan2013–20172–90111
Philippines20161261
Indonesia20173041
Oceania
Australia20140.1–22326Yeo et al. (2015)
New Zealand20146
Australia20191221Karlsson et al. (2021)
New Zealand2019761Karlsson et al. (2021)
Remote Island
Remote islands in Pacific, Atlantic and Indian Ocean1.1–9.98Heskett et al. (2012)
Seven Remote Islands2001–20180.41–127Ohgaki et al. (2021)
*  Σ13 PCBs=sum of 13 PCB congeners (PCBs - 66, 101, 110, 149, 118, 105, 153, 138, 128, 187, 180, 170, and 206)

**  N: number of samples/locations

The extensive dataset on PCB concentrations in Africa from numerous studies reported between 2012 and 2019 highlights the significant PCB environmental pollution levels faced by the continent. The data reflect varied PCB concentration levels across different African countries, with some regions exhibiting exceptionally elevated levels indicative of severe local pollution sources. For instance, Ryan et al. (2012) reported that PCB concentrations in South African pellets ranged from 16 to 113 ng/g-pellet in 2011, highlighting variable levels of environmental contamination. Moreover, a study by Hosoda et al. (2014) reported PCB concentration in plastic resin pellets from 11 beaches along the Ghanaian coastline, revealing remarkably higher PCB concentrations in urban areas like Accra and Tema (39–69 ng/g-pellet) compared with rural coastal towns (1–15 ng/g-pellet), which were relevant to global background level. This disparity indicates substantial local PCB inputs, particularly near e-waste scrapyards, where sedimentary PCB concentrations downstream from an e-waste scrapyard in Accra were notably higher, emphasising the critical role of e-waste as a significant source of PCBs in Ghana (Hosoda et al., 2014).

Karlsson et al. (2021) studied PCBs in 22 sites across the globe including nine African countries in 2019; they reported Senegal with the world’s highest concentration at 3,384 ng/g-pellet in 2019, far exceeding the levels seen in other countries around the world. Research findings documented that the high PCB levels in samples from Plage De Hann in Hann Bay—surrounded by industrial activities and close to the Mbeueuss landfill near Dakar—point to remarkable local pollution sources and inadequate waste management practices (Karlsson et al., 2021).

Additionally, countries such as Tanzania and Tunisia have reported high PCB levels, with concentrations of 217 and 554 ng/g-pellet, respectively. Tunisia, in particular, had been documented to have the second-highest PCB levels, with samples collected from the Gulf of Tunis in the vicinity of industrial zones. This remarkable pollution points to ongoing environmental concerns in Africa. However, the extent of PCB usage in Tunisia is still insufficiently documented (Karlsson et al., 2021).

In 1986, the importation of transformers or equipment containing PCBs into Tunisia was banned. Nevertheless, numerous transformers containing PCBs are still utilised or presently stored in unsatisfactory conditions (Barhoumi et al., 2014). Therefore, local sources of PCBs such as e-waste may exist in the area. Moreover, there are slightly increasing concentrations in samples from Guinea, which have been reported in samples collected in 2014 by Ohgaki et al. (2021) and collected in 2019 by Karlsson et al. (2021), with concentrations of 58 and 84 ng/g-pellet, respectively. Conversely, Kenya showed a drastic reduction in PCB levels from 19 ng/g-pellet in 2011 (Ohgaki et al., 2021) to just 4 ng/g-pellet in 2019 at the same range as PCB background levels, indicating possible improvements in environmental management or sample site being in a small town.

In Ghana, a longitudinal observation from 2009 to 2015 highlighted fluctuating PCB concentrations ranging from 1 to 143 ng/g-pellet (Hosoda et al., 2014; Ohgaki et al., 2021). This variability could be attributed to various levels of activity and the effectiveness of local environmental regulations over time. Furthermore, South Africa’s data suggest a trend of relatively high PCB contamination, maintaining levels from 16 to 122 ng/g-pellet, which underscores consistent environmental pressure from PCBs.

The high PCB levels in areas like Senegal, Tunisia and other parts of Africa underscore the critical need for enhanced regulatory frameworks and effective waste management strategies. Moreover, the IPW data reflect the broader issue of e-waste, which is a remarkable contributor to PCB pollution, especially in less developed regions that may lack the infrastructure to manage hazardous waste effectively (Hosoda et al., 2014; Karlsson et al., 2021; Ohgaki et al., 2021).

When comparing PCB levels reported in Africa with other global concentrations, the data from countries such as the United States, Europe and Japan with concentration ranges of 4–432, 9–2,230 and 2–901 ng/g-pellet, respectively (Ohgaki et al., 2021), reveal notable differences in pollution levels and trends. Although African countries like Senegal, Tanzania, Morocco and Tunisia exhibit alarmingly high PCB concentrations, more industrialised countries have shown a noticeable decrease in such pollutants over similar periods. For instance, in the United States, certain areas such as Cox Creek in Texas reported PCB concentrations as low as 7 ng/g-pellet in 2019, which contrasts with the 3,384 ng/g-pellet recorded in Senegal the same year. Furthermore, in European regions such as Normandy, France, where concentrations were 2,230 ng/g-pellet in 2017 and 1,945 ng/g-pellet in 2010, and in Barcelona, Spain, at 1,243 ng/g-pellet, the recorded pollutant levels are still lower when compared to the highest values observed in Africa.

In terms of PCB composition, the most common congeners were penta-, hexa- and hepta-CBs in pellets. This pattern is similar to what has been reported in pellets from other parts of the world (Mizukawa et al., 2013; Hosoda et al., 2014; Yeo et al., 2015; Karlson et al., 2021). Although the specific composition varied by location, CB-138 and CB-180 were dominant in most samples, particularly in those with high PCB concentrations in Africa from Senegal, Tunisia and Tanzania. In these samples, CB-138 made up more than 50% of the total PCBs in numerous cases.

This discrepancy emphasizes both the severity of local pollution and potential gaps in environmental regulation and waste management practices in African nations. The decrease in PCB levels in historically major producer countries can be due to stringent regulatory frameworks, advanced waste management systems and heightened public awareness regarding the environmental and health risks associated with PCBs. Over the decades, these countries have established robust environmental policies, which include bans on PCB production, restrictions on their use and comprehensive programs for the cleanup and remediation of contaminated sites.

Meanwhile, increasing PCB pollution in several African countries underscores the ongoing challenges that these nations face, including inadequate waste management practices and weak regulatory oversight (Akinrinade et al., 2024). The increase in PCB levels is not attributable to historical usage within Africa, which was limited, but is more likely exacerbated by external factors including the importation of e-waste and old equipment imported from more developed nations (Gioia et al., 2013).

Components such as capacitors and transformers found in electronic equipment waste can contain PCBs, which leach into the environment as these materials degrade (Debela et al., 2022; Akinrinade et al., 2024). This issue is particularly concerning for equipment manufactured before 1980, which remains in operation today. For instance, Sudan continues to employ 255 transformers containing PCBs, whereas Cameroon had an estimated 200 tonnes of such equipment still active as of 2014 (NIP, 2016; Patrie, 2016; UNEP, 2018). The situation is further exacerbated by improper disposal and informal recycling practices. For instance, in Gambia, decommissioned transformers are sold as scrap metal, whereas in Uganda and Zimbabwe, transformer oil containing PCBs is repurposed for activities such as welding and lubricants, posing considerable health risks (UNIP, 2016; ZNIP, 2016).

Despite these grave risks, the regulatory response across Africa is still inconsistent. Only about a quarter of African countries have established national legislation that specifically targets PCB management. Although some countries have included PCB regulations within broader environmental or chemical management laws, others lack specific legislation related to PCBs (Akinrinade et al., 2024). This regulatory gap impedes the effective management and elimination of PCB pollution. The disparity in regulatory enforcement, management capacity and e-waste management across the African continent highlights the critical need for comprehensive strategies. These should include enhanced legal frameworks, regional cooperation, increased capacity building and improved e-waste management to effectively address the PCB challenge in Africa.

OCCURRENCE OF PCBs IN AFRICA

SEDIMENTS AND SOILS

The dataset reported for PCBs in African soil and sediment is provided in Table 2. Moeckel et al. (2020) reported Σ32 PCB concentrations in the range of 6.5 to 830 ng/g at the Agbogbloshie (Ghana) e-waste site and the Kingtom domestic dumpsite. The site was reported to have extensive e-waste recycling operations, and researchers associated these high concentrations with high e-waste loads in the vicinity of sampling locations (Moeckel et al., 2020). A related study in Accra, Ghana, reported that e-waste recycling practices at scrapyards were shown to considerably influence PCB levels, with Σ13 PCB concentrations ranging from 0.14 to 32.2 ng/g between 2010 and 2012 (Hosoda et al., 2014). This highlights the critical issue of e-waste contributing to environmental pollution. The presence of PCBs in these locations is directly associated with improper disposal and recycling practices related to e-waste. Likewise, in Nairobi, Kenya, urban industrial activities elevated topsoil PCB levels up to 55.49 ng/g in 2015, contrasting sharply with rural sites, where levels did not exceed 9.64 ng/g (Sun et al., 2016).

Table 2 Occurrence of PCBs in environmental samples sediments, soils, and indoor dust (ng/g); atmosphere (pg/m3); and water (ng/mL) in African countries in previous studies and in other regions

Loction, CountrySampling YearNumber of SamplesSample TypeNumber of congeners analyzedΣPCBsCongenrsRefrence
Sediment (ng/g)
Mediterranean Coast, Egypt201310sedimentΣ10 PCBs15.1–37.5PCB-18, 28, 44, 52, 101, 118, 138, 153, 180, 194Salem et al. (2013)
Accra, Ghana2010–20128Sediment (e-waste scrapyard)Σ13 PCBs0.14–32.2PCB-66, 101, 110, 149, 118, 105, 153, 138, 128, 187, 180, 170, 206Hosoda et al. (2014)
Dakar, Senegal201310surface sedimentΣ28 PCBs4–333PCB-8, 18, 28, 44, 52, 60, 77, 81, 101, 105, 114, 118, 123, 126, 128, 138, 153, 156, 157, 167, 169, 170, 180, 185, 189, 195, 206, 209Net et al. (2015)
Winam Gulf, Kenya20159sedimentΣ12 PCBs0.0174–0.812PCB-77, 81, 126, 169, 105, 114, 118, 123, 156, 157, 167Omwoma et al. (2015)
KwaZulu-Natal, Umgeni River, South Africa201415surface sedimentΣ8 PCBs102–427PCB-28, 52, 77, 101, 105, 138, 153, 180Gakuba et al. (2015)
Port Elizabeth Harbour,South Africa201211Surface SedimentΣ6 PCBs0.56–2.35PCB-28, 52, 101, 138, 153, 180Kampire et al. (2015)
Nairobi,Kenya201559top soilΣ7 PCBsn.d.–55.5PCB-28, 52, 101, 118, 138, 153, 180Sun et al. (2016)
Lake Victoria, Kenya20146sedimentΣ7 PCBs2.2–96.3PCB-28, 52, 101, 118, 138, 153 and 180Oluoch-Otiego et al. (2016)
Accra, Ghana201014soil from open burning of e-waste siteΣ6 PCBs3.4–83dl PCBs-77, 81, 126,169, 105, 114Tue et al. (2016)
Ogun River, Nigeria201256Surface sedimentΣ19 PCBs323–2,003PCB-1, 5, 18, 31, 44, 52, 66, 87, 101, 110, 138, 141, 151, 153, 170, 180, 183, 187, 206Adeogun et al. (2016a)
Ona River, Nigeria28589–1,360
Port Elizabeth, South Africa201442surface sedimentΣ6 PCBs1.6–3.06PCB-28, 52, 101, 138, 153, 180Kampire et al. (2017)
Klip and Jukskei Rivers, South Africa20138surface sedimentΣ7 PCBs2.9–61PCB-28, 52, 101, 118, 138, 153, 180Rimayi et al. (2017)
Kinshasa, Congo20169surface sedimentsΣ12 PCBs3.46–52.9PCB-28, 52, 101, 118, 149, 153, 105, 138, 128, 156, 180, 170Kilunga et al. (2017)
Olifants River Basin, South Africa201212SedimentΣ33 PCBs0.16–2.0PCB-18, 28, 44, 49, 52, 87, 95, 99, 101, 105, 110, 118, 128, 138, 146, 149, 151, 153, 156, 170, 171, 172, 174, 177, 180, 183, 187, 194, 195, 199, 205, 206, 209Verhaert et al. (2017)
Msunduzi River, South Africa201310sedimentΣ8 PCBs362–5,041PCB-28, 77, 101, 52, 153, 105, 138, 180Adeyinka et al.(2018)
soil379.9–2,442.7
Durban Bay, South Africa201210SedimentΣ24 PCBs6–110PCB-8, 18, 28, 44, 52, 49, 44, 66, 101, 99, 87, 110, 151, 149, 118, 153, 105, 138, 187, 183, 187, 128, 180, 170, 206, 209Vogt et al. (2018)
Mngeni River, South Africa22<LOQ–21
Lagos and Osun States, Nigeria201610sedimentΣ28 PCBs4.19–8.58PCB-8, 18, 28, 44, 52, 60, 77, 81, 101, 105, 114, 118, 123, 126, 128, 138, 153, 156, 157, 167, 169, 170, 180, 185, 189, 195, 206, 209Igbo et al. (2018)
Kiambu to Mombasa, Kenyans12soilΣ7 PCBs9.90–20.8PCB-28, 52, 101, 118, 138, 153, 180Makokha et al. (2018)
Lagos, Nigeria201548soil (electricity generation facilities )Σ7 PCBs2–220PCB-28, 52, 101, 118, 138, 153, 180Folarin et al. (2018)
Gauteng Province, South Africa2017nsLandfill SedimentΣ7 PCBs3–6.9PCB-28, 52, 101, 118, 138, 153, 180Sibiya et al. (2018)
Douala, Cameroun201730soils (Informal E-Waste Recycling Sites)Σ30 PCBs32.1–72.8PCB-8, 28, 37, 44, 49, 52, 60, 66, 70, 74, 77, 81, 82, 87, 99, 101, 105, 114, 118, 123, 128, 138, 153, 156, 157, 167, 170, 179, 180, 189Ouabo et al. (2018)
New Calabar River, Nigerians5Surface sedimentΣ8 PCBs210–2,160PCB-1 ,5, 18 ,77,105, 156, 189, 194Ilechukwu et al. (2018)
Onitsha Axis, Nigeria201720SedimentΣ20 PCBs0.001–13.2PCB-5, 18, 31, 44, 52, 66, 87, 101, 110, 138, 141, 151, 153, 170, 180, 183, 187, 206.Ibeto et al. (2019)
East of Oran, Algeriansnssurface soilsΣ7 PCBsnd–19.34PCB-28, 52, 101, 118, 138, 153, 180Halfadji et al. (2019)
Niger Delta, Nigeria20179transformer oilsΣ14 PCBs484–48,506PCB-18, 28, 29, 43, 52, 101, 118, 138, 142, PCB-153, 170, 180, 194, 209Aganbi, et al. (2019)
5soil8.4–510
Umgeni River bank, South-Africa201314soilΣ8 PCBs113–543PCB-1, 5, 18, 77, 105, 156, 189, 194Gakuba et al. (2019)
Gauteng Province, South Africa20177landfill sedimentΣ7 PCBs2.25–6.86PCB-28, 52, 101, 118, 138, 153, 180Sibiya et al. (2019)
Agbogbloshie, Ghana201515surface soils (e-waste site dumping site)Σ32 PCBs6.5–830PCB-18, 28, 31, 37, 47, 52, 66, 74, 99, 101, 105, 114, 118, 122, 123, 128, 138, 141, 149, 153, 156, 157, 167, 170, 180, 183, 187, 189, 194, 206, 209Moeckel et al. (2020)
Kingtom, Ghana201510surface soils (domestic dumpsite)0.74–43
Swartkops, Port Elizabeth, South Africa2017–201820SedimentsΣ17 PCBs70–3,800PCB-18, 31, 52, 44, 66, 101, 87, 110, 151, 153, 141, 138, 187, 183, 180, 170, 206Olisah et al. (2020b)
Sunday, Port Elizabeth, South Africa80–1,710
Addis Ababa, Ethiopia2018–201945Soil (transformer dumpsite)Σ6 PCBs166–4,500PCB-28, 52, 101, 138, 153, 180Debela et al. (2020)
Lagos lagoon, Nigerians150sediment coresΣ14 PCBsbdl–6.41PCB-18, 28, 20, 52, 44, 105, 142, 118, 153, 101, 138, 180, 170, 194Benson et al. (2020)
Niger river, Nigeria20199Surficial sedimentsΣ28 PCBs13.5–277PCB-18, 28, 44, 52, 60, 77, 81, 101, 105, 114, 118, 123, 126, 128, 138, 153, 156, 157, 167, 169, 170, 180, 185, 189, 195, 206, 209Irerhievwie et al. (2020)
Ase river, Nigeria20199Σ28 PCBsnd–1,633
Forcados river, Nigeria20199Σ28 PCBs6.9–78.6
Escravos River Basin, Nigeriano data25Sediment around oil production facilitiesΣ28 PCBs226–31,900PCB-8, 18, 28, 44, 52, 60, 77, 81, 101, 105, 114, 118, 123, 126, 128, 138, 153, 156, 157, 167, 169, 170, 180, 185, 189, 195, 206, 209Iwegbue et al. (2020)
Nairobi River, Kenya20083sedimentsΣ7 PCBs<bdl–157.64PCB-28, 52, 101, 118, 138, 153, 180Ndunda et a., (2021)
Tanzanians2sedimentΣ7 PCBs510.6PCB-28, 52, 101, 118, 138, 153, 180Folarin et al. (2021)
Volta Basin, Ghana201980sedimentΣ7 PCBs0.042–5.320PCB-28, 52, 101, 118, 138, 153, 180Magna et al. (2022)
urban Dar es Salaam, Tanzania20195core sedimentΣ32 PCBs0.19–5.8PCB-18, 28, 31, 33, 37, 47, 52, 66, 74, 99, 101, 105, 114, 118, 122, 123, 128, 138, 141, 149, 153, 156, 157, 167, 170, 180, 183, 187, 189, 194, 206, 209Nipen et al. (2022)
Edor River, Nigeria20199sediment (around a glass industry and power generating plant)Σ28 PCBs976–5,670PCB-8, 18, 28, 44, 52, 60, 77, 81, 101, 105, 115, 118, 123, 126, 128, 138, 153, 156, 157, 167, 169, 170, 180, 185, 189, 195, 206, 209Iwegbue et al. (2022)
Okpare River, Nigeria1,440–6,340
Afiesere River, Niger delta, Nigeria1,520–3,540
Tanzania202018SedimentΣ6 PCBs0.1–5.5PCB-153, 105, 28, 156, 157, 167Zhao et al. (2022)
Niger Delta, Nigerians18soilsΣ28 PCBs88.0–293PCB-8, 18, 28, 44, 52, 60, 77, 81, 101, 105, 114, 118, 123, 126, 128, 138, 153, 156, 157, 167, 169, 170, 180, 185, 189, 195, 206, 209Emoyan et al. (2022)
southwestern Nigeria2019–202172Surficial sedimentsΣ22 PCBs9.86–80.76PCB-18, 28, 29, 43, 52, 77, 81, 101, 105, 118, 126, 138, 142, 153, 157, 167, 169, 170, 180, 194, 206, and 209Apata et al. (2022)
Nairobi, Kenya202025sedimentΣ30 PCBs3.1–157.1PCB-31, 28, 52, 77, 95, 101, 123, 118, 114, 105, 126, 151, 149, 146, 153, 138, 167, 169, 187, 183, 177, 180, 170, 195, 194, 209Vane et al. (2022)
Dakar Coast, Senegal201812surface sedimentΣ18 PCBs5.93–25.75PCB-18, 31, 28, 52, 44, 70, 101, 81, 123, 118, 114, 138, 126, 167, 157, 180, 169, 189Cisse et al. (2023)
Ojutu River, Osun State Nigeria201353soilΣ7 PCBs1,020PCB-28, 52, 101, 118, 138, 153, 180Afolabi et al. (2023)
5sedimentΣ7 PCBs649
Alaba, Lagos, Nigeria20206soil (electronic waste dumpsite)Σ19 PCBs94.5–274.5PCB-1, 5, 18, 31, 44, 52, 66, 87, 101, 110, 138, 141, 151, 153, 170, 180, 183, 187, 206.Ayoola et al. (2023)
Port Harcourt city, Nigeria201920soilsΣ28 PCBs4.59–116PCB-8, 18, 28, 44, 52, 66, 77, 81, 101, 105, 114, 118, 123, 126, 128, 138, 153, 156, 157, 167, 169, 170, 180, 187, 189, 195, 206, 209Ossai et al. (2023)
Lagos lagoon, Gulf of Guinea201954SedimentΣ27 PCBs273–6,757PCB-8, 18, 28, 44, 52, 60, 77, 81, 101, 105, 114, 118, 123, 126, 128, 138, 153, 156, 157, 167, 169, 170, 180, 185, 189, 195, and 206Unyimadu et al. (2023)
Other Regions
Chicago, USA201310Surficial sedimentsΣ209 PCBs650–500Peverly et al. (2015)
Songhua River, China201411Surficial sedimentsΣ7 PCBs0.59–12.4PCB-28, 52, 101, 118, 138, 153, 181Cui et al. (2016)
Seine River Basin, France201312Surficial sedimentsΣ15 PCBs500–2,370PCB-18, 31, 28, 20,52,44,101,149,118,153,105, 138,180, 170, 194Lorgeoux et al. (2016)
Thames River, England201313Surficial sedimentsΣ7 PCBs0.12–27.4PCB-28, 52, 101, 118, 138, 153, 180Lu 2017
Indoor dust (ng/g)
Durban, South Afirca201210indoor dust from homesΣ3 PCBs891PCB-28, 153, 180Abafe et al. (2015)
11indoor dust from offices923
13indoor dust (university students office)1,880
3indoor dust of e-waste recycling and electronic equipment repair facilities161–593
Lagos, Nigeria201416indoor dust from carsΣ6 PCBs3.09–30.69PCB-28, 52, 101, 153, 138, 180Harrad et al. (2016)
12indoor dust from house17.9–67.6
18indoor dust from offices19.5–97.3
Cape town, South Africans1indoor dustΣ6 PCBs272.6PCB-28, 52, 101, 153, 138, 180Folarin et al. (2018a)
Lagos, Nigeria201548indoor dust (office, electricity generation facilities )Σ7 PCBs21–2,200PCB-28, 52, 101, 118, 138, 153, 180Folarin et al. (2018b)
Abraka and Warri, southern Nigeria201740dusts (electronic repair workshop )Σ28 PCBs96.6–3,949 PCB-18, 28, 44, 52, 60, 77, 81, 101, 105, 114,118, 126, 128, 138,153, 156, 157, 167, 169, 170, 180, 185, 189, 195, 206, 209Iwegbue et al. (2019)
Lagos, Nigeria201715house dustΣ8 PCBs3.8–61PCB-28, 11, 138, 180, 153, 52, 118, 101Akinrinade et al. (2021)
Port Harcourt city, Nigeria201915indoor dusts (homes and shops)Σ28 PCBs1.80–23.0PCB-8, 18, 28, 44, 52, 60, 77, 81, 101, 105, 114, 118, 123, 126, 128, 138, 153, 156, 157, 167, 169, 170, 180, 185, 189, 195, 206, 209Ossai et al. (2023)
outdoor dustsnd–57.4
Air (pg/m3)
11 countries in Africa2009nsambient air (rural and urban sites)Σ7 PCBs8–2,074PCB-28, 52, 101, 118, 138, 153, 180Bogdal et al. (2013)
Ghana201116Atmosphere (informal electronic waste recycling activities)Σ190 PCBs280–11,100Hogarh et al. (2018)
Lake Victoria, East Africa2003–201053outdoor air _ urbanΣ18 PCBs19.2–462PCB-22, 28, 33, 52, 49, 47 70, 66, 101, 99, 110, 118, 105, 151, 153, 138, 158, 128, 157, 183, 174, 180, 206, 207Arinaitwe et al. (2018)
Bizerte, Tunisia2015–201660Aerosol samples (roof of the Faculty of Sciences)Σ20 PCBs0.30–11.0PCB-8, 18, 28, 52, 44, 66, 77, 101, 105, 118, 126, 128, 138, 153, 170, 180, 195, 206, 187, 209Barhoumi et al. (2018)
Africa, 9 countries (Congo, Ghana, Ethiopia, Kenya, Mali, Mauritius, Morocco, Nigeria, and Sudan)2008–201984Air samplesΣ6 PCBs0.006–0.724PCB-28, 52, 101, 138, 153, 180White et al. (2020)
Lagos, Nigeria2018–201923outdoor air _ urbanΣ8 PCBs49–220PCB-11, 28, 52, 101, 118, 138, 153, 180Akinrinade et al. (2022)
Other Regions
Antarctica2011–201433oudoor air_ RemoteΣ20 PCBs4.8–62PCB-11, 28, 52, 77, 81, 101, 105, 114, 118, 123, 126, 138, 153, 156, 157, 167, 169, 180, 189, 209Wang et al. (2017)
China2016–201762oudoor air_ Remote to suburbanΣ209 PCBs9–6,856Zhao et al. (2020)
Northern Vietnam2013–201513oudoor air_ UrbanΣ209 PCBs170–1,100Anh et al. (2020)
Patagonia, Argentina201811Ambient airΣ38 PCBs25PCB-18, 17, 31, 28, 52, 49, 44, 95, 74, 70, 101, 99, 87, 110, 151, 82, 149, 118, 132, 153, 105, 138, 187, 183, 128, 177, 171, 156, 180, 191, 201, 170, 169, 208, 195, 194, 205, 206Miglioranza et al. (2021)
Water (ng/mL)
KwaZulu-Natal, Umgeni River, South Africa201415surface waterΣ8 PCBs6.91–21.69PCB-28, 52, 77, 101, 105, 138, 153, 180Gakuba et al. (2015)
River Nile, Egypt201320River waterΣ10 PCBs14–20PCB-28, 52, 44, 70, 101, 153, 118, 105, 138, 180Megahed et al. (2015)
River Niger, Nigeria2014240Surface water samplesΣ8 PCBs0.0808–0.2883PCB-11, 28, 52, 101, 118, 138, 153, 180Unyimadu J et al. (2017)
Msunduzi River, South Africa201310waterΣ8 PCBs6.49–141.7PCB-11, 28, 52, 101, 118, 138, 153, 180Adeyinka et al. (2018)
Lagos, Nigeria201510waterΣ12 PCBs23PCB-18, 28, 31, 44, 52, 101, 153, 118, 138, 149, 180, 194Folarin et al. (2018b)
Buffalo River, South Africa2015–201612Surface waterΣ19 PCBs0.185–2.329PCB-1, 5, 18, 31, 44, 52, 66, 87, 101, 110, 138, 141, 151, 153, 170, 180, 183, 187, 206Yahaya et al. (2018)
Port Elizabeth, Eastern Cape, South Africa2017–201850Surface water (vicinity of the power station)Σ19 PCBs0.0148–2.91PCB-1, 5, 18, 31, 52, 44, 66, 101, 87, 110, 151, 153, 141, 138, 187, 183, 180, 170, 206Olisah et al. (2019)
Niger Delta, Nigeria20172drainage water (vicinity of the power station)Σ14 PCBs990–2,950PCB-77, 81, 105, 114, 118, 123, 126, 156, 157, 167, 169, 170, 180, 189Aganbi et al. (2019)
4groundwater160–560
Nairobi River, Kenya20083waterΣ7 PCBs<bdl–0.79PCB-28, 52, 101, 118, 138, 153, 181Ndunda et al. (2020)
Tanzania202025Surface water (18 lakes)Σ6 PCBs6.0×10−4–2.0×10−2PCB-153, 105, 28, 156, 157, 167Zhao et al. (2022)
Nigeria202012waterΣ8 PCBs<bdl–29PCB-11, 28, 52, 101, 118, 138, 153, 180Afolabi et al. (2023)
Alaba, Lagos, Nigeria20204water (electronic waste dumpsite)Σ19 PCBs3,040–5,820PCB-1, 5, 18, 31, 44, 52, 66, 87, 101, 110, 138, 141, 151, 153, 170, 180, 183, 187, 206.Ayoola et al. (2023)
Lagos lagoon, Gulf of Guinea201918Surface waterΣ27 PCBs69.2–440PCB-8, 18, 28, 44, 52, 60, 77, 81, 101, 105, 114, 118, 123, 126, 128, 138, 153, 156, 157, 167, 169, 170, 180, 185, 189, 195, 206Unyimadu et al. (2023)
Other Regions
Sacramento river, USA2002–2010300Surface waterΣ40 PCBs0.12–6.7PCB-8, 18, 17, 31, 28, 52, 49, 44, 95, 74, 70, 101, 99, 87, 110, 151, 82, 149, 118, 132, 153, 105, 138, 187, 183, 128, 177, 171, 156, 180, 191, 201, 170, 169, 208, 195, 194, 205, 206David et al. (2015)
Tiber River and Estuary, Italy2014–201521Surface waterΣ32 PCBs1.90×10−4–6.82×10−4PCB-8, 28, 37, 44, 49, 52, 60, 66, 70, 74, 77, 82, 87, 99, 101, 105, 114, 118, 126, 128, 138, 153, 156, 158, 166, 169, 170, 179, 180, 183, 187, 189Montuori et al. (2016)
Coastal area of Bangladesh201528Surface waterΣ209 PCBs0.032–0.19Habibullah-Al-Mamun et al. (2019)
Shanghai, China2009–201353Surface waterΣ14 PCBsnd–0.039PCB-77, 81, 105, 114, 118, 123, 126, 156, 157, 167, 169, 170, 180, 189Wang et al. (2017)

Note: below detection limit (bdl); not specified (ns); not detected (nd); limit of quantification (LOQ)

A further study by Adeyinka et al. (2018) reported that PCB concentrations of Σ8 PCBs in the Msunduzi River, South Africa, were alarmingly high, with sediment levels reaching up to 5,041 ng/g and soil levels up to 2,442.7 ng/g. Gakuba et al. (2019) documented the concentration of Σ8 PCBs from 113 to 543 ng/g in the Umgeni Riverbank, South Africa. A later study by Olisah et al. (2020) in Port Elizabeth, South Africa, reported PCBs Σ17 PCBs ranging from 70 to 3,800 ng/g, in sediment, and indicated that PCB contamination is likely related to industrial discharges or stormwater runoff.

Meanwhile, Aganbi et al. (2019) reported a concentration of 17 PCB congeners ranging from 484 to an alarming level of 48,506 ng/g in the Niger Delta. Another study in Nigeria, Edor River in 2019, reported PCB concentration in sediments near a glass industry and power-generating plant containing Σ28 PCBs ranging from 976 to 5,670 ng/g, indicating industrial discharges as a major source of contamination (Iwegbue et al., 2021).

In a study by Ouabo et al. (2018), PCB concentrations in Douala, Cameroon, reflected contamination at informal e-waste recycling sites with Σ30 PCB levels from 32 to 73 ng/g. Sibiya et al. (2019) reported low concentrations in Gauteng Province, South Africa, where concentrations of Σ7 PCBs were 2.25–6.86 ng/g in sediments. Egypt’s Mediterranean Coast presented moderate contamination with Σ7 PCB levels from 15.13 to 37.49 ng/g as reported by Salem et al. (2013).

High PCB concentrations were later documented around glass industries and power-generating plants in Nigeria, with levels of up to 6,340 ng/g in 2019 of Σ28 PCBs by Iwegbue et al. (2022). This underscores the significant environmental risks posed by industrial activities. In urban settings like Lagos, Nigeria, soils from electricity generation facilities revealed PCB levels of Σ7 PCBs from 21 to 2,200 ng/g in 2015 (Folarin et al., 2018), further emphasising the impact of industrial emissions on urban soil quality. Ayoola et al. (2023) also reported that soil PCB levels of Σ19 PCBs ranged from 94.5 to 274.5 ng/g in e-waste sites in Alaba, Lagos, highlighting the severe environmental health risks associated with improper e-waste management. Nipen et al. (2021) reported a concentration of Σ32 PCBs from 0.19 to 5.8 ng/g in core sediment samples from Tanzania, Urban Dar es Salaam (Nipen et al., 2021). In Senegal, sediment from the Dakar region contained Σ18 PCB levels from 4 to 333 ng/g, as reported by Net et al. (2015), indicating variable pollution likely associated with urban runoff and nearby industrial activities.

Omwoma et al. (2015) reported Σ13 PCBs at concentrations ranging from 0.0174 to 0.812 ng/g in the Winam Gulf, Kenya, which suggests lower levels of contamination that reflect minimal industrial impact. Gakuba et al. (2015), studying the Umgeni River in South Africa, documented PCB levels from 102 to 427 ng/g in surface sediment. This urban–rural disparity emphasizes the influence of urbanisation and industrial activities on PCB contamination.

Verhaert et al. (2017) reported Σ33 PCBs in the Olifants River Basin in South Africa concentrations ranged between 0.16 and 2.0 ng/g dw in sediments (Verhaert et al., 2017). These levels are notably lower than those reported in surface sediments of the Ogun River in Nigeria, where reported Σ19 PCB concentrations ranged from 323 to 2,003 ng/g (Adeogun et al., 2016). Likewise, Σ28 PCBs concentrations in the Niger River’s surficial sediments ranged from 13.5 to 277 ng/g (Irerhievwie et al., 2020), with the Ase and Forcados rivers also indicating considerable levels of Σ28 PCBs up to 1,633 and 78.6 ng/g, respectively (Irerhievwie et al., 2020).

In most samples, hexa-chlorinated PCBs were the most abundant homologue group and accounted for nearly 40% at most sites, followed by penta- and hepta-congeners. Low molecular weight PCBs (including tri-CBs) showed very low concentrations in these studies, whereas they accounted on average for 15% of the total PCB burden in samples from Agbogbloshie. A similar trend has been reported in suburban areas around Nairobi, Kenya (Sun et al., 2016), which also showed similar tri-to-hepta- CB ratios.

Comparing these African data with those from other regions worldwide highlights interesting contrasts. For instance, in the Thames River, England, Σ7 PCBs in surficial sediments were reported to range from 0.12 to 27.4 ng/g (Lu et al., 2017), which is somewhat comparable to the lower concentrations observed in the Olifants River Basin but remarkably lower than those reported in the Escravos River Basin in Nigeria, where Σ28 PCBs reached up to 31,900 ng/g due to industrial activities (Iwegbue et al., 2020).

In China, the Songhua River, Cui et al. (2016) reported Σ7 PCB concentrations from 0.59 to 12.4 ng/g in surficial sediments (Cui et al., 2016), similar to the lower end of concentrations documented in African sediments but still lower than the more contaminated sites like the Escravos River Basin. Furthermore, in the Seine River Basin, France, Σ15 PCBs reported in surficial sediments ranged from 500 to 2,370 ng/g (Lorgeoux et al., 2016), which are considerably higher than many of the African sites, except for the highly contaminated Escravos River Basin.

By contrast, surficial sediments from the Chicago River in the United States reported Σ209 PCB concentrations between 650 and 500 ng/g (Peverly et al., 2015), indicating a heavy industrial influence comparable to or exceeding levels found in some African rivers such as the Niger and Ase.

These comparisons demonstrate that although PCB contamination is present across Africa, the levels in many regions are comparable to those found in highly industrialised regions such as the Seine River Basin in France and urban areas in the United States and the United Kingdom. However, certain hotspots like the Escravos River Basin in Nigeria show considerably higher contamination levels, underscoring the impact of localised industrial activities.

Overviewed studies in African countries underscore the diverse contamination levels across Africa, from lower concentrations in natural and rural settings to alarmingly elevated levels in urban, industrial and particularly e-waste handling areas. The consistent detection of PCBs across Africa calls for enhanced regulatory frameworks, rigorous environmental monitoring and robust waste management strategies to mitigate the impact of PCB pollution effectively. The data across Africa could reflect concerning levels of PCB contamination in regions with extensive industrial activities and inadequate waste management, particularly regarding e-waste; however, in general, owing to inconsistent monitoring methods and limited data availability, temporal trends remained unclear. The identification of specific hotspots and the stark regional disparities necessitate targeted environmental policies and enhanced regulatory frameworks to effectively mitigate PCB pollution. Enhanced monitoring, stricter waste management protocols and international cooperation are crucial to reducing PCB levels and protecting ecosystems and public health across Africa.

AQUATIC ENVIRONMENTS

Surface and ground waters from various African locations have been documented over the years to assess PCB concentrations, revealing significant regional disparities and potential pollution sources. The data span from 2013 to 2024, with studies that target both urban and remote areas (Table 2).

In a study by Gakuba et al. (2015) in South Africa, PCB levels in water samples from the Umgeni River in KwaZulu–Natal reported Σ8 PCBs ranging from 6.91 to 21.69 ng/mL, which are within typical urban industrial levels and above the stringent European Union limit of 0.1 ng/mL for PCBs in surface waters. Meanwhile, PCB concentrations in the Msunduzi River were reported to be as high as 141.7 ng/mL, indicating potential localised sources of PCB pollution or historical contamination affecting the river (Adeyinka et al., 2018). Contrastingly, the situation in Nigeria presents some of the highest PCB levels recorded in the region, particularly in areas associated with industrial activities. For example, the Niger Delta demonstrated extremely high concentrations—up to 2,950 ng/mL of Σ14 PCBs in drainage water near a power station, emphasizing industrial discharge as a significant source of pollution (Aganbi et al., 2019).

These concentrations are among the highest when compared with those reported by other African studies and suggest that industrial processes in the Niger Delta may be contributing disproportionately to PCB pollution. In urban settings like Lagos, Nigeria, water samples from an e-waste dumpsite reported by Ayoola et al. (2023) contained between 3,040 and 5,820 ng/mL of Σ19 PCBs, illustrating the severe impact of e-waste on water quality. Such levels are not only extraordinarily high but also indicative of the challenges faced by regions with heavy e-waste processing activities.

In a later study, Afolabi et al. (2023) reported PCB concentrations of Σ8 PCB < bdl −29 ng/mL in water samples collected from Kenya in a non-urban setting, highlighting lower PCB levels in less industrialized water bodies. In a separate study, Zhao et al. (2022) investigated Σ18 PCB in Tanzania from 18 lakes in the Eastern Rift Valley, documenting levels ranging from 6.0×10−4 to 2.0×10−2 ng/mL. These findings indicate the presence of PCBs in aquatic environments, although at relatively low concentrations.

In another study in Nairobi, Kenya, Ndunda et al. (2020) reported PCB levels of seven congeners as undetectable to 0.79 ng/mL, PCBs 28, 138 and 153 were the most dominant contributing more than 50% to the total PCBs in sediments. These lower concentrations may reflect either effective management practices or lesser industrial and e-waste influences compared with places like Nigeria (Aganbi et al., 2019).

When comparing PCB levels in surface and groundwater from African regions with those from other parts of the world, some differences and similarities are evident. For instance, David et al. (2015) reported Σ40 PCBs in the Sacramento River, USA, ranging from 0.12 to 6.7 ng/mL in surface water, which overlaps with PCB levels observed in African surface waters, such as the Buffalo River, South Africa, where Σ19 PCBs were reported at 0.185 to 2.329 ng/mL (Yahaya et al., 2018). However, the levels in the United States were generally higher than those in African regions.

By contrast, studies from the Tiber River in Italy indicated Σ32 PCBs at much lower levels, between 1.90×10−4 and 6.82×10−4 ng/mL (Montuori et al., 2016), which are remarkably lower than most values reported across African water bodies. Likewise, Wang et al. (2017) reported Σ14 PCBs in surface water ranging from not detected to 0.039 ng/mL, which is lower than those documented in highly polluted areas such as the Lagos lagoon in Nigeria, where Σ27 PCBs ranged from 69.2 to 440 ng/mL (Unyimadu et al., 2023).

These comparisons suggest that although some regions outside Africa, such as the United States, show a similar range of PCB contamination in water, others, particularly in Europe and Asia, exhibit lower levels. This underscores the relatively high levels found in certain African water bodies.

The review data on aquatic environments in Africa suggests a complex pattern of PCB distribution across African waters, heavily influenced by local industrial activities, waste management practices and historical use patterns of PCB-containing equipment. The notable contrasts between areas such as the Niger Delta and Nairobi or Tanzania underscore the need for targeted environmental policies and remediation efforts tailored to the specific conditions and challenges of each region (Adebusuyi et al., 2022; Ayoola et al., 2023). Effective management and reduction of PCB sources, particularly in heavily polluted areas, will be vital for enhancing water quality and protecting aquatic and human health across the continent.

ATMOSPHERE AND INDOOR DUST

Table 2 summarizes the data reported on concentrations of PCBs in studies of atmospheric samples, as well as indoor dust in Africa from 2013 to 2024.

Studies on the emission of PCBs in West Africa revealed high concentrations especially in Gambia and Ivory Coast both with up to 300 pg/m3 and the lowest PCB contamination level was recorded in Ghana (9 pg/m3) (Gioia et al., 2011). In Durban, South Africa, a study by Abafe et al. (2015) indicated indoor PCB contamination reaching 891 ng/g in home dust and 923 ng/g in office dust. This reflects high human exposure to these POPs in indoor environments. Moreover, higher pollutant levels have been reported in enclosed settings such as university student offices, with dust samples showing concentrations of up to 1,880 ng/g, which is indicative of significant external or building-specific source infiltration (Abafe et al., 2015).

Harrad et al. (2016) reported PCB contamination in various indoor settings within Lagos, Nigeria, in 2014. Their study further documented widespread urban exposure, with PCB concentrations in car dust ranging from 3.09 to 30.69 ng/g, house dust from 17.9 to 67.6 ng/g and office dust from 19.5 to 97.3 ng/g. These findings emphasise the prevalence of PCBs in urban environments, attributable to a combination of indoor sources and infiltration from the urban atmosphere. Further data from Lagos by Folarin et al. (2015) documented PCB levels in indoor dust from electricity generation facilities ranging from 2 to 220 ng/g, underscoring occupational exposure risks. Akinrinade et al. (2021) reported PCB concentrations ranging from 3.8 to 61 ng/g that house dust in Lagos, Nigeria. The reviewed documents reinforce earlier observations, which indicate a persistent presence of PCBs in residential environments.

In the outdoor air, a study conducted in Ghana by Hogarh et al. (2018) revealed extremely high PCB levels, ranging from 280 to 11,100 pg/m3 in the air around informal e-waste recycling activities. These observations highlight serious air quality problems and potential health risks linked to unregulated e-waste handling. In East Africa, Uganda, from 2008 to 2010, Arinaitwe et al. reported PCB levels in urban outdoor air ranging from 4.4 to 48 pg/m3, reflecting the broader regional atmospheric contamination by PCBs. Likewise, in Bizerte, Tunisia, Barhoumi et al. (2019) reported PCB concentrations in aerosol samples collected from the roof of the Faculty of Sciences, which varied from 3.5 to 2.4 pg/m3, documenting the persistence of PCBs in the Mediterranean urban atmosphere.

These studies from various African regions emphasize the widespread distribution and variability of PCB contamination in dust and air, signalling significant environmental and public health challenges, particularly in urban and industrialised settings in Africa, despite no history of PCB manufacturing on the continent. Focused efforts to reduce sources and monitor hotspots have led to remarkable decreases in atmospheric PCB concentrations in the Northern Hemisphere; meanwhile, despite reductions in PCB emissions in previously active areas, several studies have noted high PCB levels in locations far from original sources such as Africa (Jaward et al., 2004; Gioia et al., 2008, 2011). High PCB levels were recorded off the West African coast on cruises on board research vessels in 2001, 2005 and 2008. Klanova et al. (2009) found that urban and industrial sites in several African countries, including South Africa, Senegal, Kenya, Egypt, the Republic of Congo, Ghana and Sudan, had monthly average PCB concentrations of 100 pg/m3 or higher, levels comparable with those in the United States and European cities.

Nevertheless, a recent study using over a decade of passive air monitoring (2008–2019) by the MONET network has provided the first comprehensive dataset for documenting long-term trends of POPs in the African atmosphere (White et al., 2020). This study specifically focused on PCB monitoring in nine African countries (Congo, Ghana, Ethiopia, Kenya, Mali, Mauritius, Morocco, Nigeria and Sudan). As of 2019, concentrations of these pollutants varied, with PCBs ranging from 0.5 to 37.7 pg/m3. The recent findings reveal a general decrease in the concentrations of PCBs, over the past 10 years, although decreases have been slow at some locations. Elevated concentrations at specific sites were primarily attributed to persistent local emissions, whereas the lower concentrations reported at Mount Kenya are thought to represent the continental background levels influenced by long-range atmospheric transport. Regarding PCB composition, PCB concentrations in Mount Kenya were dominated by PCBs 28 and 52 and the absence of higher chlorinated PCBs. PCB emission sources are generally congener-specific, with the less chlorinated PCBs being the most volatile and therefore most associated with revolatilization from landfills, poorly stored or disposed of waste and contaminated soil. Conversely, emissions of the more chlorinated PCBs have been attributed to combustion processes (White et al., 2020).

When comparing PCB levels in Africa to those reported globally, variations can be significant. In Antarctica, Wang et al. (2017) recorded Σ11 PCB levels ranging from 4.8 to 62 pg/m3 in remote outdoor air between 2011 and 2014, which are generally lower than many levels documented in Africa. Likewise, Zhao et al. (2020) reported that in China (2016–2017), Σ11 PCBs ranged from below detection limits to 249 pg/m3 in remote to suburban outdoor air, aligning with the lower spectrum of African levels yet below the higher values seen in Ghana. Another study by Anh et al. (2020) in Northern Vietnam also documented a range of Σ11 PCBs between 68 and 300 pg/m3 in urban outdoor air from 2013 to 2015, paralleling or slightly under some urban African figures (Anh et al., 2020). Moreover, Miglioranza et al. (2021) reported Σ38 PCBs in ambient air from Patagonia, Argentina, at approximately 25 pg/m3 in 2018-less than in Africa (Miglioranza et al., 2021). Overall, studies in Africa, particularly those documented from informal e-waste recycling in Ghana, have documented relatively high PCB concentrations than samples from outside Africa.

These comprehensive data emphasize the ongoing challenges of PCB contamination across Africa, driven by factors like e-waste recycling and inadequate waste management despite the slight decrease in PCB trend. Only a quarter of African countries have established national legislation targeting PCB management, and although some have incorporated PCB regulations within broader environmental or chemical management laws, others lack any specific PCB-related legislation (Akinrinade et al., 2024). To address these environmental and public health issues effectively, the continued monitoring and adaptation of regulations are crucial.

BIOLOGICAL SAMPLES/HUMAN

Table 3 presents a summary of the concentrations reported on human/biological samples from 2014 to 2023.

Table 3 Occurrence of PCBs in biological samples; biota (ng/g) and human samples (μg/L) in African countries in previous studies and in other regions

Loction, CountrySampling YearNumber of SamplesSample TypeNumber  of congeners analyzed∑PCBsCongenersRefrence
Biota (ng/g)
Dakar. Senegal201310Mugilcephalus, Sarotheroron melanotheronΣ28 PCBsnd–95PCB-8, 18, 28, 44, 52, 60, 77, 81, 101, 105, 114, 118, 123, 126, 128, 138, 153, 156, 157, 167, 169, 170, 180, 185, 189, 195, 206, 209Net et al. (2015)
Perna perna<bdl–1,228
Swartkops, South Africa201224Fish tissues (P. commersonnii) liver, muscle and fatΣ7 PCBs<LOQ–195PCB-28, 52, 101, 118, 138, 153, 180Nel et al. (2015)
Fish tissues (Lichia amia)<LOQ–91
Fish tissues (A. japonicas)<LOQ–198
Port Elizabeth Harbour, South Africa201360Mytilus galloprovincialisΣ6 PCBs14.48–21.37PCB-28, 52, 101, 138, 153, 180Kampire et al. (2015)
Arusha, Tanzania2011159free-range chicken eggsΣ7 PCBs0.36–9.2PCB-28, 52, 101, 118, 138, 153, 180Polder et al. (2016)
Ogun River, Nigeria2013–2014107fish (muscle tissue of tilapia species)Σ15 PCBs359–4,636PCB-8, 18, 28, 44, 52, 60, 77, 118, 123, 138, 153, 170, 189, 206, 209Ibor et al. (2016)
South Africa2005–200990six dolphin speciesΣ21 PCBs78.5–938PCB-28, 37, 52, 77, 81, 101, 105, 114, 118, 123, 126, 153, 138, 128, 156, 157, 167, 169, 180, 188, 209Gui et al. (2016)
Eleyele Reservoir, Nigeria20146Cichlid sp. (fish tissue); Tilapia guineensisΣ7 PCBs2,531.1PCB-28, 52, 101, 118, 138, 153, 181Adeogun et al. (2016a)
Eleyele Reservoir, Nigeria20146Cichlid sp. (fish tissue); Sarotherodon galilaeusΣ7 PCBs1,178.7PCB-28, 52, 101, 118, 138, 153, 181Adeogun et al. (2016b)
Cichlid sp. (fish tissue); Oreochromis niloticus891.8
Cichlid sp. (fish tissue); Tilapia zillii832.8
Cichlid sp. (fish tissue); Hemichromis fasciatus475.7
Cichlid sp. (fish tissue); Sarotherodon melanotheron333.2
Lake Victoria, Kenya20146fish (Oreochromis niloticus, Lates niloticus, and Rastrineobola argentea)Σ7 PCBs300–3,000PCB-28, 52, 101, 118, 138, 153, 181Oluoch-Otiego et al. (2016)
South Africa and Reunion Island201389albacore tuna (Thunnus alalunga)Σ18 PCBs0.0051–1.2677 ww12 dl-PCB-77, 81, 105, 114, 118, 123, 126, 156, 157, 167, 169, 189 and 6 PCB-28, 52, 101, 138, 153, 80Munschy et al. (2016)
Senegal201330edible fishΣ6 PCBs1–8PCB-28, 52, 101, 138, 153, 180Diop et al. (2017)
Zanzibar islands (Pemba and Unguja) and mainland (Mtwara), Tanzania201648milkfish livers (Chanos chanos), mullet (Mugil cephalus)∑10 PCBs<LOD–8.13 lwPCB-28, 52, 74, 99, 101, 118, 138, 153, 180Mwakalapa et al. (2018)
Onitsha Axis, Nigeria201720sharptooth catfish (Clarias gariepinus)Σ20 PCBsnd–94PCB-7, 18, 28, 43, 52, 60, 77, 101, 105, 123, 126, 128, 137. 154, 170, 180, 185, 195, 200, 209Ibeto et al. (2019)
Saldanha Bay, South Africa2018-Mussels (C. meridionalis, M. galloprovincialis)Σ11 PCBs6.9 –6.7 dwPCB-18, 28, 44, 52, 70, 110, 118, 138, 149, 153, 180Firth et al. (2019)
South Africa201721Chokka squid (Loligo reynaudii)Σ7 PCBs4.8–9.2 lwPCB-28, 52, 101, 118, 138, 153, 180Wu et al. (2019)
Zanzibar, Tanzania201865fish and prawnΣ16 PCBs5.6–336PCB-28, 52, 74, 99, 101, 105, 118, 128, 136, 138, 153, 156, 170, 180, 183, 187Haarr et al. (2021)
Other Regions
Hokkaido, Japan200247red-crowned cranes (Grus japonensis), muscle tissuesΣ16 PCBs27–1,600 lwPCB-101, 105, 110, 114, 118, 123, 138, 149, 153, 156, 157, 167, 169, 180, 187, 189Kakimoto et al. (2018)
South Carolina, USA2014765 dolphin prey fish species: Atlantic croaker (Micropogonias undulatus); red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus); spot (Leiostomus xanthurus), spotted seatrout (Cynoscion nebulosus) and striped mullet (Mugil cephalus).Σ121 PCBs5.02–232.20PCB-138, 139, 141, 146, 153, 156, 157, 167, 169, 170, 171, 174, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 182, 183, 185, 188, 189, 191, 193, 194, 195, 196, 199, 201, 202, 205, 206, 208, 209Fair et al. (2018)
Okinawa, Japan2017–201922oysters (Saccostrea mordax)Σ19 PCBs<LOD–4,100 lwPCB-28, 52, 95, 101, 105, 118, 138, 153, 156, 157, 167, 178, 180, 189, 194, 202, 206, 208, 209Mukai et al. (2020)
Gulf of Naples, Italy2016–201942mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis)Σ6 PCBs0.30–37.3dl PCB-28, 52, 101, 138, 153, 180Esposito et al. (2020)
Human (μg/L)
16 Western and Central African countries2013575Blood samples serum of African immigrants∑18 PCBs82–678PCB-28, 52, 77, 81, 101, 105, 114, 118, 123, 126, 138, 153, 156, 157, 167, 169, 180, 189Luzardo et al. (2014)
Agbogbloshie, Accra, Ghana201158Human blood (informal e-waste recycling workers)Σ3 PCBs0.002–0.078PCB-138, 153, 180Wittsiepe et al. (2015)
Tunisia201254Blood serumΣ3 PCBs26.08–119.1 lwPCB-138, 153, 180Artacho- Cordan et al. (2015)
Arusha,Tanzania201295Human milk (mother-infant couples)Σ7 PCBs<LOD–157PCB-28, 52, 101, 118, 138, 153, 180Müller et al. (2017)
Accra, Ghana2014–2016105Human milk (e-waste recycling site)Σ7 PCBs<LOD–29.20PCB-18, 28, 52, 101, 138, 153, 180Asmoah et al. (2018)
Tema, Ghana201717Maternal blood, pergnant womenΣ12 PCBs0.059 lwdl PCB-81, 77, 123, 118, 114, 105, 126, 167, 156, 157, 169, 189Bruce-Vanderpuije et al. (2019)
Accra, Ghana0.096 lw
Agbogbloshie (e-waste recycling site), Accra, Ghana201588Human blood (e-waste workers)Σ6 PCBs0.03–14.7PCB-28, 52, 101, 138, 153, 180Kaifie et al. (2020)
196Human blood (not workers, control)0.03–1.29
Kampala, Uganda201830Human breast milkΣ18 PCBs0.0133–1.297 lwPCB-28, 52, 101, 138, 153, 180, 77, 81, 126, 105, 114, 118, 123, 156, 157, 167, 189Matovu et al. (2021)
Accra, Ghana201724Human milkΣ12 PCBs1.50×10−4–2.13×10−1PCB-81, 77,123, 118, 114, 105, 126, 167, 156, 157, 169, 189Bruce-Vanderpuije et al. (2021)
Other Regions
Guangdong province, China2017–2018179Human breast milkΣ12 PCBs1.419–2.598 lwPCB-81, 105,114,123,156,157,167,189Huang et al. (2019)
Germany201699Human breast milkΣ20 PCBs0.000–0.115 lwPCB-11 ,14, 28, 52, 77, 81, 101, 105, 114, 118, 126, 138, 153, 156,1 57, 167, 169, 180, 189Zhong-Min et sl. (2019)
New Jersey, USA2016–2018920Human serum samplesΣ40 PCBs0.256–0.350 lwPCB-18, 28, 44,49, 52, 66, 74, 87, 99, 101, 105, 110, 114,118, 123, 128, 138, 146, 149, 151, 153, 156, 157, 167, 170, 172,177, 178, 180, 183, 187, 189, 194, 195, 196, 199, 206, 209Du et al. (2020)

Note: below detection limit (bdl); not specified (ns); not detected (nd); limit of quantification (LOQ); lipid weight (lw); wet weight (ww)

Net et al. (2015) documented Σ28 PCB concentrations in aquatic organisms in Dakar, Senegal, reporting the highest concentrations in Perna perna species, up to 1,228 ng/g dw, and the lowest in Penaeus kerathurus, with levels ranging from undetectable to 95 ng/g. Following this, Diop et al. (2017) reported Σ6 PCB levels in 30 edible fish samples from Senegal, with findings showing concentrations between 1 and 8 ng/g.

In another study, in Swartkops, South Africa, reported by Nel et al. (2015) PCB levels in 24 fish tissue samples from three species (P. commersonnii, Lichia amia and A. japonicas). Σ7 PCB concentrations were reported from below the quantifiable limits to 198-ng/g dry weight (Nel et al., 2015). Meanwhile, Mytilus galloprovincialis from Port Elizabeth Harbor in 2013 exhibited levels from 14.48 to 21.37 ng/g, suggesting low to moderate pollution (Kampire et al., 2015).

In Arusha, Tanzania, free-range chicken eggs in 2011 contained PCBs ranging from 0.36 to 9.2 ng/g (Polder et al., 2016), whereas Ibor et al. (2016) reported significant contamination in tilapia muscle tissues, with concentrations reaching up to 4,636 ng/g in the Ogun River, Nigeria. The authors associated these high concentrations could be concerning for dietary intake. The Eleyele Reservoir in Nigeria, extensively studied in 2014, showed extraordinarily high PCB levels across various cichlid species, indicating heavy local pollution. For instance, Tilapia guineensis and Sarotherodon melanotheron recorded levels up to 2,531.1 and 333.2 ng/g, respectively (Adeogun et al., 2016). Lake Victoria in Kenya also has been reported to have high PCB levels in 2014, ranging from 300 to 3,000 ng/g in fish species like Oreochromis niloticus, reflecting significant aquatic ecosystem contamination (Oluoch-Otiego et al., 2016).

PCB levels from African regions demonstrate a wide range, with some values comparable to those reported in other parts of the world. For instance, in South Carolina, USA, Fair et al. (2018) reported Σ121 PCBs in dolphin prey fish species at levels ranging from 5.02 to 232.20 ng/g (Fair et al., 2018), which is higher than those found in fish tissues in Swartkops, South Africa (Nel et al., 2015b). Nevertheless, Mukai et al. (2020) documented levels of Σ19 PCBs in oysters from Okinawa, Japan (2017–2019), from below detection limits to 4,100-ng/g lipid weight exceeding those typically reported in African samples.

By contrast, red-crowned cranes from Hokkaido, Japan, have been reported to have Σ16 PCBs ranging from 27 to 1,600 ng/g lw (Kakimoto et al., 2018), which is somewhat similar to the levels observed in South Africa and Reunion Island’s albacore tuna, with Σ18 PCBs ranging from 0.0051 to 1.2677 ng/g ww (Munschy et al., 2016). This highlights the diversity in PCB contamination levels across different regions and species.

Human exposure to PCBs through consumption and environmental contact was evident in African countries. Agbogbloshie, Ghana, is an area well-known for its extensive e-waste recycling operations; Wittsiepe et al. (2015) have documented PCB levels in human blood from 58 individuals working in informal e-waste recycling sites; Σ7 PCBs ranged from 0.002 to 0.078 μg/L.

A further study conducted by Kaifie et al. (2020) at the Agbogbloshie e-waste site in Ghana documented significant variations in PCB exposure. They have reported Σ6 PCB concentrations samples from 88 individuals ranging from 0.03 to 14.7 μg/L in the human blood of e-waste workers and PCB levels from 0.03 to 1.29 μg/L from 196 participants not workers as control groups. The authors associated these concentrations with PCB exposure due to proximity to e-waste handling activities (Kaifie et al., 2020). Regarding PCB congeners, a significant difference was observed in the levels of lower chlorinated PCB congeners (PCBs 28, 52 and 101) between e-waste workers and the control group. Among the specific recycling tasks, workers involved in dismantling and burning e-waste exhibited the highest levels of PCBs 28 and 52. Moreover, e-waste workers demonstrated elevated levels of PCBs 138, 153 and 180, likely due to increased occupational exposure in their work environment.

Later study in the same location in Accra, Ghana, concentrations of Σ12 PCBs were reported by Bruce-Vanderpuije et al. (2021), where concentrations of PCBs 118, 105 and 156 were considerably higher among all congeners; Σ12 PCBs ranged from 1.50×10−4 to 2.13×10−1 μg/L from 24 individual human milk. A related study in Accra by Asmoah et al. (2018) reported Σ7PCBs levels in human milk collected from 105 mothers at an e-waste recycling site, with mean concentrations of 3.64 μg/L. In samples from the largest electric and e-waste dump and recycling site in Accra, PCB-28 was reported as the most prevalent, accounting for 30% of the total PCBs in the milk samples, whereas PCB-101 was reported as the least prevalent, representing 1.74%.

In comparison, PCB levels in human samples from African regions and other parts of the world indicated notable differences. For instance, Huang et al. (2019) reported PCB levels in Guangdong Province, China (2017–2018); Σ12 PCBs were reported at levels ranging from 1.419- to 2.598-μg/L lipids in human breast milk (Huang et al., 2019), which were higher than those documented in some African locations included in the review. Conversely, in Germany, Zhong-Min et al. (2019) reported Σ20 PCB levels in human breast milk ranging from undetectable to 0.115 μg/L, a range that overlaps with the lower end observed in Africa but remains below the highest levels reported, such as in Ghana, where Σ7 PCBs reached up to 29.20 μg/L in human milk from e-waste recycling sites (Asmoah et al., 2018). This contrast highlights the geographical disparities in PCB exposure, with some non-African regions experiencing higher exposures comparable with or exceeding those documented in more contaminated African environments.

Studies performed across various African countries have documented the persistent and pervasive nature of PCB pollution, which impacts both wildlife and human populations. In some regions, particularly those affected by industrial activities such as e-waste recycling activities, PCB levels have been reported to be alarmingly high, reflecting environmental contamination.

E-WASTE MANAGEMENT IN AFRICA

In recent years, Africa’s demand for electrical and electronic equipment (EEE) has increased at a rate of 2.5% per annum. Besides the e-waste generated locally, numerous African countries import significant amounts of EEE (Maphosa and Maphosa, 2020). The growing consumption of EEE has accordingly led to an upsurge in e-waste produced on the continent (Asante et al., 2019; Lebbie et al., 2021).

Africa locally generates between 50% and 85% of its total e-waste, with the remainder originating from illegal cross-border imports from developed countries in the Americas, Europe and China. Monitoring the transboundary movement of e-waste into Africa is challenging; however, Ghana, Nigeria and Tanzania have been identified as key recipients from the EU/UK. Nigeria, particularly, imports significant volumes of used electronic and electrical equipment, with over 60,000–71,000 tonnes annually entering Lagos, primarily from the EU. Major African ports like Durban, in South Africa, Bizerte and Lagos serve as entry points for such e-waste, often bypassing international conventions through illegal practices like mislabelling (Lebbie et al., 2021; Maes and Preston-Whyte, 2022).

According to Forti et al. (2020), Africa generated 2.9 Mt of e-waste, which converts to 2.5 kg per capita in 2019. Although the per capita e-waste generation in Africa is the second lowest globally, more than 60% is obtained from imports from high-income countries such as the United States and Europe (Bimir, 2020; Forti et al., 2020). E-waste contains valuable materials, making recycling an economically viable opportunity. Consequently, the trade, repair and informal recovery of valuable materials from e-waste provides an important source of income for many economically disadvantaged populations. Moreover, e-waste presents a hazard to the environment, animals and humans because a large range of toxic chemicals (toxicants) are associated with e-waste and can be released from it, which poses serious risks to human health and the environment (Williams et al., 2008).

Few countries including South Africa and Egypt have limited infrastructure for formal e-waste recycling; however, these limited infrastructures co-exist with a huge informal sector (Maes and Preston-Whyte, 2022). Consequently, the recycling companies have faced difficulty in progressing and increasing the amount of e-waste recycled. Conversely, large countries including Nigeria, Kenya and Ghana continue to rely on informal recycling (Adanu et al., 2020; Forti et al., 2020). Currently, the informal sector, including collectors and recyclers dominates e-waste management in Africa. Additionally, government control of this sector is presently very negligible and unproductive, and there are a limited number of organised schemes for take-back or licensed services for sorting and dismantling e-waste (Bakhiyi et al., 2018; Maphosa and Maphosa, 2020).

Africa faces the challenge of managing both domestic and imported cross-border e-waste. This influx often includes waste misrepresented as ‘charitable donations’ or ‘second-hand goods’, leading to significant environmental and human health impacts (Baldé et al., 2017). In Ghana, for instance, only a portion of the imported 0.215 million metric tonnes of e-waste in 2019 was found to be potentially usable, with the majority requiring proper disposal. The illegal dumping and burning of non-functional e-waste further exacerbate ecological damage, highlighting the need for stricter regulation and improved recycling infrastructure (Okeke et al., 2024). Nearly all imported EEE in Africa comes from developed nations, and the lack of effective e-waste recycling laws has led to significant illegal waste imports processed through informal methods. Although some African countries have begun implementing e-waste legislation, enforcement remains weak, which results in continued challenges with e-waste management (Baldé et al., 2017).

CONCLUSION AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES

This review highlighted the persistent presence of PCBs in African environmental matrices at concentrations comparable to or, in some cases, higher than those reported globally. Despite available data, comprehensive information on PCBs is lacking in many African countries. However, the IPW employed effective screening methods to understand trends in global samples, including those from Africa. Reviewed studies suggested a shift in PCB pollution levels from traditional regions e.g., the United States and Western Europe to African regions, where PCBs were neither produced nor widely utilized. The findings from IPW studies underscore the critical need for robust regulatory frameworks and effective waste management strategies in African countries to manage PCB pollution effectively. The global distribution of PCBs, as shown by their presence in plastic pellets on beaches worldwide, calls for a concerted international effort to tackle the sources, effects and management of PCBs in Africa.

Significant sources of PCBs in Africa include obsolete transformers and the ongoing importation of e-waste into Africa from Northern America, particularly Europe. The clandestine nature of these imports complicates global emission inventories and control strategies. Thus, efforts to curb the export of obsolete products and waste from developed countries are crucial, along with implementing robust waste management solutions to eliminate PCBs in Africa.

Effective e-waste management strategies are urgently needed and should include stringent legislation, public education and technological advancements. These strategies should not only aim to reduce PCB pollution but also foster sustainable practices that prevent the future accumulation of toxic substances. Furthermore, regular monitoring of PCB concentrations is needed, particularly in countries with dense industrial activities and open burning sites. Monitoring should extend to both rural and urban settings to understand spatial trends and human exposure. Consistent long-term monitoring at selected locations is also essential to track temporal trends and assess the effectiveness of PCB reduction measures. Considering that only a quarter of African countries have established national legislation targeting PCB management, and although some have incorporated PCB regulations within broader environmental or chemical management laws, others lack any specific PCB-related legislation (Akinrinade et al. 2024). This regulatory gap hinders the effective management and elimination of PCB pollution. Studies reviewed indicated that there is a substantial deficiency in follow-up studies and monitoring evaluating the efficacy of cleanup activities in Africa.

Research on PCB exposure is scarce, and analytical data are primarily available for limited countries in air, soil and sediments, with few studies examining human exposure near potential contamination sites. This information is crucial for understanding the public health implications of PCB exposure.

Lastly, the lack of continuous and consistent monitoring of PCBs in Africa may stem from insufficient technical and institutional capacity. PCB analysis remains cost-prohibitive for many African countries due to expensive equipment and labour-intensive sample preparation. Developing local analytical capabilities is essential for achieving PCB reduction or elimination goals. Overviewed literatures call for enhanced monitoring and stricter regulations to decrease the levels of PCBs and their associated risks.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We would like to express our sincere gratitude to all the members of our laboratory for their valuable feedback and assistance throughout the writing of this review. We would also like to extend our gratitude to Mr. Takashi Tokumaru for providing the photograph of the burning site in Africa utilized in our graphical abstract. His contribution has greatly enhanced the visual impact of our work.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIALS

This review does not involve any original data or materials. All the data used in this review are derived from published literature and are cited in the main text or main tables. No additional data or materials are available.

REFERENCES
 
© 2024 The Authors.

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons [Attribution 4.0 International] license.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
feedback
Top