An Official Journal of the Japan Primary Care Association
Online ISSN : 2187-2791
Print ISSN : 2185-2928
ISSN-L : 2185-2928
An Observational Study of Google Reviews and Ratings of Medical Institutions
Kazushi TakehisaMasaya HondaRyutaro HibiTsuyoshi SugimaruTomoya HiguchiTomoko MatsuiMachiko InoueGiichiro Oiso
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2023 Volume 46 Issue 1 Pages 2-11

Details
Abstract

Introduction: Patients often refer to information on the Internet when selecting a medical institution, and some patients provide feedback on their experiences. In this study, we analyzed the content of patients' evaluations of medical institutions on Google.

Methods: This study evaluated Google reviews and ratings of medical institutions in Shizuoka Prefecture. We coded the reviews with 12 items according to their content, and further categorized them into "positive," "negative," "unclassifiable," and "no description." We used modified Poisson regression analysis to investigate the relationship between ratings and assessment items.

Results: Our sample consisted of 2,044 medical institutions. The number of reviews included in the analysis was 13,769. Reviews frequently commented on "doctor's behaviors," and positive comments about doctor's behaviors were significantly associated with high ratings (B: 0.76, 95%CI: 0.70 to 0.82), whereas negative comments were associated with low ratings (−4.65, −5.24 to −4.06).

Conclusion: Within the reviews on Google, doctors' behavior had an impact on the ratings of medical institutions.

Content from these authors
© 2023 The Japan Primary Care Association
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top