Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies (Indogaku Bukkyogaku Kenkyu)
Online ISSN : 1884-0051
Print ISSN : 0019-4344
ISSN-L : 0019-4344
Traces of a Dispute between Shandao and Jingang Visible in the Nianfo-jing: In Relation to the Anti-Sanjie-jiao Stance in Middle Tang Dynasty Pure Land Buddhism
Hirotaka Katō
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2018 Volume 67 Issue 1 Pages 243-248

Details
Abstract

In Pure Land Buddhism during the middle of the Tang dynasty, there are many commonalities with the Sanjie-jiao (Three Stages sect). Of those, the most striking is the ideology of sect-founder worship. That is, just as we can confirm the deification of Xinxing (540–594), we can also see the worship of Shandao (613–681) in the Nianfo-jing in Pure Land Buddhism.

Since the foundation of the Sanjie-jiao precedes Pure Land Buddhism, it is thought that there is a high likelihood that Pure Land received this aspect from the Sanjie-jiao, but this is where the challenge at hand begins. Criticism to the Sanjie-jiao is seen in the Nianfo-jing. In the middle Tang dynasty, although Pure Land adherents criticised Sanjie-jiao, the former tried to assimilate the latter.

Furthermore, the traces of disputes between Shandao and Jingang (dates unknown) in the Nianfo-jing can be assumed to contain some symbolic attributes related to the external appearance of Pure Land. These are thought to be explicable by reading it from the perspective of mid-Tang dynasty Pure Land adherents’ view of the Sanjie-jiao. This paper will examine the traces of dispute seen in the Nianfo-jing, while relating it to its oppositional stance to the Sanjie-jiao, and explain the aspects of teacher worship in mid-Tang dynasty Pure Land Buddhism.

Content from these authors
© 2018 Japanese Association of Indian and Buddhist Studies
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top