Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies (Indogaku Bukkyogaku Kenkyu)
Online ISSN : 1884-0051
Print ISSN : 0019-4344
ISSN-L : 0019-4344
The Definition of Saṅghabheda Attested in the Saṅghabhedavastu of the Mūlasarvāstivāda Vinaya
Kaworu Kominami
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2023 Volume 71 Issue 2 Pages 896-893

Details
Abstract

Two types of saṅghabheda, namely cakrabheda and karmabheda, appear in the Abhidhar­makośabhāṣya (AKBh). Sasaki 2000, 57-123 and Mori 2000, 296-334 both examine the Vinayas based on the two definitions. However, there have been different opinions concerning the definition attested in the Saṅghabhedavastu (SBhV) of the Mūlasarvās­tivāda Vinaya (MSV). Sasaki points out that the passage in SBhV defines only cakrab­heda. In contrast, Mori points out that the definition of karmabheda appears in SBhV as well, but is a later addition. This paper reexamines the definition of saṅghabheda attested in SBhV.

A comparison of the Sanskrit, Tibetan, and Chinese versions of SBhV reveals that the later technical term “karmabheda” is not likely to have occurred in the original text of SBhV. However, by comparison with AKBh, it is clear that the definition of karmabheda is attested in SBhV. The explanation of karmabheda found in the Abhidharma literature, like AKBh, is very likely to have been derived from the corresponding part of SBhV (or the prototype of the existing MSV), and indeed, SBhV and AKBh share many common elements. In addition, the passage defining karmabheda in SBhV is not unique to MSV, because the same kind of question and answer content is also found in the Vinaya Piṭaka. Therefore, it is difficult to conclude that the relevant passage in SBhV is a later addition.

Content from these authors
© 2023 Japanese Association of Indian and Buddhist Studies
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top