Abstract
To balance between cost and performance, and to explore 3D field-programmable gate array (FPGA) with realistic 3D integration processes, we propose spatially distributed and functionally distributed types of 3D FPGA architectures. The functionally distributed architecture consists of two wafers, a logic layer and a routing layer, and is stacked by a face-down process technology. Since vertical wires pass through microbumps, no TSVs are needed. In contrast, the spatially distributed architecture is divided into multiple layers with the same structure, unlike in the functionally distributed type. This architecture can be expanded to more than two layers by stacking multiples of the same die. The goal of this paper is to elucidate the advantages and disadvantages of these two types of 3D FPGAs. According to our evaluation, when only two layers are used, the functionally distributed architecture is more effective. When higher performance is achieved by using more than two layers, the spatially distributed architecture achieves better performance.
