Legal History Review
Online ISSN : 1883-5562
Print ISSN : 0441-2508
ISSN-L : 0441-2508
Concerning the Separation between Hon-kuji (Main Suits) and Kane-kuji (Money Suits) in the Civil Litigation of the Tokugawa Shogunate
Fumio JIMBO
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

1995 Volume 1995 Issue 45 Pages 1-38,en3

Details
Abstract

In this paper I tried to investigate the process of separating between hon-kuji (main suits) and kane-kuji (money suits) in the civil litigation of the Tokugawa Shogunate.
The subject of the separation between hon-kuji and kane-kuji is, after all, equal to the matter of the formation of kane-kuji. The category of kane-kuji was formed in substance by the late Genroku or the Hoei period (early 18th century), and was recognized formally in 1716 (Sho-toku 6).
It is the widely-accepted notion that hon-kuji was "general suits" and kane-kuji was "exceptional suits". In fact, however, it was not hon-kuji, but kane-kuji that would have been developed to modern civil litigation.

Content from these authors
© Japan Legal History Association
Next article
feedback
Top