The Annals of Legal Philosophy
Online ISSN : 2435-1075
Print ISSN : 0387-2890
Methodology and theory of constitution in Gerber and Laband
Kiyotaka NISHIMURA
Author information
JOURNAL OPEN ACCESS

2009 Volume 2008 Pages 165-172

Details
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to discuss the relation between legal methodologies and theories of constitution of C. F. v. Gerber and Paul Laband who are positivists of constitutional law (Staatsrecht) in the 19th century in Germany. Positivist theory of constitutional law and its view of state as artificial person are criticized for its formalism as outdated theory.But.in this paper. 1 will confirm that they tried to ensure that the juristic independence from other fields by limiting its object to description of national power. Moreover. I will insist following two points: (1) Gerber’s theory of status-constitution retreated as his legal methodology progressed. (2) the views about the national power in later Gerber and Laband corresponded with the modern constitutional theoretical model which distinguished state and society strictly. Finally I’d like to propose a more consistent alternative model.
Content from these authors
© 2009 The Japan Association of Legal Philosophy
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top