Journal of Occupational Health Law
Online ISSN : 2758-2574
Print ISSN : 2758-2566
Judicial precedent introduction/judicial precedent research
Case of Hokkaido Research Institute for the Twenty-first Century Co., Ltd and Others
Takeshi Hayashi
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2023 Volume 2 Issue 1 Pages 222-234

Details
Abstract
This paper described and examined the case of Hokkaido Research Institute for the Twenty-first Century Co., Ltd and others (Sapporo High Court; Judgment on December 19, 2019). In this case, a plaintiff in the first instance (X), employed by a defendant in the first instance (Y1 Company) as a chief researcher, developed depression after X worked overtime exceeding 100 hours a month, four times a year. After the condition was recognized as a labor accident in January 2014, X asserted that Y1 Company had breached its duty of care and claimed damages against it. In addition, X demanded compensation against Y1 Company and an X’s direct supervisor (Y2), asserting that improper labor management of Y1 Company and harassment and other acts by Y2 were torts against X. In the first instance, the court recognized a causal link between work and X’s depressive symptoms. Concerning these torts committed by Y1 Company and Y2, the court recognized unfair pay cuts and a forced resignation, determining that a breach of the duty of care was found only in the coercion of resignation.
Content from these authors
© 2023 The Japan Association of Occupation Health Law
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top