Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis
Online ISSN : 1880-3873
Print ISSN : 1340-3478
ISSN-L : 1340-3478
Original Article
Non-HDL-C, Symptomatic Intracranial Arterial Stenosis, and Recurrent Vascular Risk in Minor Stroke
Haimei FanTingting LiuKaili ZhangYongle WangRong WangFei YangFeifei ChenYanli ZhangHuaai GuoXinyi LiXuemei WuXiaoyuan Niu
Author information
JOURNAL OPEN ACCESS FULL-TEXT HTML

2025 Volume 32 Issue 2 Pages 141-162

Details
Abstract

Aim: We aimed to assess the association between non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) and symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis (sICAS), as well as the impact of non-HDL-C on recurrent vascular events in patients with mild ischemic stroke ( NIHSS score ≤ 5).

Methods: This prospective study was based on data from patients presenting within 72 hours of stroke occurrence. We included patients admitted to 8 Chinese hospitals between September 2019 and November 2021. The associations of non-HDL-C with sICAS and recurrent vascular risk were assessed using multivariate regression models and a restricted cubic spline analysis.

Results: Among the 2,544 patients analyzed at 12 months, 652 (25.6%) were diagnosed with sICAS. Elevated non-HDL-C was linked to a higher incidence of sICAS, and the adjusted odd ratios for quintile variables and continuous variables were 1.36 ([95% CI, 1.01–1.81]) and 1.14 ([95% CI, 1.04–1.24). In comparison to those in the first quintile, the adjusted hazard ratio of the fifth quintile of non-HDL-C was 1.19 ([95% CI 0.78–1.80]) for recurrent ischemic stroke and was 0.39 ([95% CI, 0.17–0.91]) for intracranialhemorrhage.

Conclusions: The non-HDL-C level may be a useful predictor of sICAS. Higher non-HDL-C levels may be associated with a lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage in mild, noncardiogenic stroke, but not a higher risk of recurrent ischemic stroke.

Xuemei Wu and Xiaoyuan Niu contributed equally to this work.

See editorial vol. 32: 122-124

Trial Registration Information

URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=41160

Unique Identifier: ChiCTR1900025214

Abbreviations: NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; LDL-C, Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; non-HDL-C, non–high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; sICAS, symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis; ICH, intracranial hemorrhage.

Introduction

Approximately half of acute ischemic stroke patients initially exhibit minor neurological impairments, with an NIHSS score of ≤ 5 1, 2), and they may subsequently experience disabling events. Besides antiplatelet agents, statin-based LDL-C-lowering therapy is a widely adopted strategy within 72 h of the onset of symptoms. However, in addition to LDL-C, numerous studies have focused on exploring new risk indicators that may be linked to the recurrence of vascular events after cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) is often used to analyze the sum of proatherogenic lipoproteins, which include very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL), VLDL remnants, intermediate-density lipoprotein, LDL, and lipoprotein (a)3). It is easily obtainable and calculated by deducting HDL-C from total cholesterol (TC)3, 4).

Some published studies have confirmed that elevated non-HDL-C levels are positively associated with the incidence of cardiovascular events, both in healthy individuals and patients with basic cardiovascular diseases5-7). However, the association between non-HDL-C level and the risk of ischemic stroke remains debatable. High non-HDL-C levels have been linked to an increased risk of ischemic stroke in the majority of studies targeting healthy populations or the general population4, 8-11), but another study did not identify any connection7). In addition, there are a few conflicting reports on the connection between non-HDL-C and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) following acute ischemic stroke. A large cohort study from China suggested that no significant relationship was observed between non-HDL-C levels and the risk of ICH12), while the Japan Public Health Center-based Prospective (JPHC) study found that among Japanese men, lower non-HDL-C levels were linked to a higher risk of ICH13).

There is no solid evidence regarding the impact of non-HDL-C on recurrent ischemic stroke and the occurrence of ICH following a minor stroke. To our knowledge, no previous research has investigated the possible link between symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis and non-HDL-C level.

This study aimed to evaluate the associations between non-HDL-C and sICAS, recurrent ischemic stroke, and intracranial hemorrhage within 12 months in patients who experienced a mild, noncardiogenic stroke within 72 hours after the onset of symptoms.

Patients and Methods

Patients and Study

This study is a secondary report on “Safety and efficacy of aspirin-clopidogrel in acute non-cardiogenic minor ischemic stroke: a prospective and multicenter study based on real-world (SEACOAST)”, which has been registered at https://www.chictr.org.cn. The study was conducted in 8 hospitals in China from September 2019 to November 2021. We recruited participants who were admitted to hospitals within 72 h of stroke occurrence and who had an NIHSS score of ≤ 5. The protocol has been uploaded and the study was approved by the ethics committee of the First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University. Prior to enrollment, each patient or close relative provided their written informed consent. To avoid bias, patients included in this study received statin medication in addition to antiplatelet agents. Within hours of admission, statins were initiated and continued for 12 months or less.

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

The study’s inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) acute mild ischemic stroke (NIHSS score ≤ 5); (2) within 72 hours from stroke occurrence to hospital arrival; (3) with signs of an acute ischemic stroke on brain computed tomography (CT) or diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) associated with the symptoms; (4) intracranial vascular examination performed (magnetic resonance angiography [MRA], computed tomographic arteriography [CTA], or digital subtraction angiography [DSA]); (5) therapy using either clopidogrel or aspirin, or clopidogrel-aspirin; (6) medication with moderate- or high-intensity statins; (7) premorbid mRS score ≤ 1; (8) diagnosis of noncardiogenic stroke at discharge; and (9) assessment of TC and HDL-C levels. The following exclusion criteria were applied: (1) treatment with thrombolysis or surgical or endovascular therapy before the endpoint event occurred; (2) participation in clinical trials for other drugs within the past 3 months; (3) life expectancy of <3 months or pregnancy; and (4) early anticoagulant therapy. The mRS provides scores ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (death) to indicate the degree of disability or dependence in everyday activities. The NIHSS score ranges from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating a more severe stroke.

Baseline Data Collection

The baseline factors included age, sex, body mass index, mRS score before index stroke, NIHSS score on admission, medication history prior to stroke, blood pressure at admission, current smoking status, alcohol abuse, medical history (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, stroke, transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, coronary heart disease, and atrial fibrillation), lipid profile, image data, stroke classification, and in-hospital treatment. Stroke subtypes were categorized using the TOAST (Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment) criteria upon discharge from the hospital.

All patients had venous blood samples drawn from the anterior elbow vein for routine laboratory testing after fasting for at least eight hours in the previous evening. Blood samples were stored and processed according to the requirements of each sub-center laboratory.

Following this stroke, imaging data were acquired during the emergency care or hospital stay. T1-weighted imaging, T2-weighted imaging, DWI, and MRA sequences were used for cranial MRI. The location and degree of ICAS were assessed using CTA, MRA, or DSA. When an intracranial artery has >50% stenosis and is accompanied by matching DWI abnormalities and clinical symptoms, it is considered sICAS14).

Clinical Outcomes and Follow-Up

Recurrent ischemic stroke and intracranial hemorrhage were considered as outcomes. A new focal neurological deficit of vascular origin lasting >24 h, an increase in the NIHSS score of ≥ 4, or imaging evidence on an MRI or CT scan (new infarction or enlargement of the existing infarction region) were all considered indicators of ischemic stroke recurrence. Intracranial hemorrhage was diagnosed by CT or MRI, including hemorrhagic transformation (according to the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study radiological classification)15), intracerebral hemorrhage, and subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Follow-up examinations of all patients were performed on days 1, 10, 21, 90±7, and 365 after enrolment. Follow-up evaluations at 3 months and 12 months were conducted mainly by telephone interviews because of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. The self-reported incidence of ischemic stroke was verified using the hospitalization records of patients who were readmitted to 8 hospitals. For those without readmission records, the chief and skilled investigators made a combined decision. A total of 84 (3%) and 253 (9%) patients were lost to follow-up after 3 and 12 months, respectively. We analyzed 2 sets of data.

Statistical Methods

Patients were divided into 5 categories based on non-HDL-C quintiles according to previous studies. Frequencies and percentages were used to represent categorical variables and means±standard deviations were used to represent continuous variables, as appropriate. The χ2 test was employed for categorical variables to compare baseline characteristics stratified by non-HDL-C quintiles, while the Kruskal-Wallis test was used for continuous variables to ascertain differences across the 5 groups.

First, we used non-HDL-C level as a continuous variable to analyze the linear association between non-HDL-C level and sICAS. Additionally, we divided non-HDL-C into 5 groups and used multivariate logistic regression models to examine the relationship between non-HDL-C and sICAS. Confounders were selected based on previous studies and univariate analyses. Subsequently, we explored the association between outcome events and quintiles of non-HDL-C levels using multivariate Cox regression models. Based on previous studies, the first quintile of non-HDL-C level was used as a reference for both ICH and recurrent ischemic stroke13, 16). These confounders were chosen based on their correlations with the relevant outcomes or because they caused an effect estimate change >10%.

Restricted cubic spline (RCS) plots were used to investigate the dose-response associations of non-HDL-C levels with sICAS, ischemic stroke recurrence, and ICH. We used a model with 4 knots at the 5th, 35th, 65th, and 95th percentiles and examined potential nonlinear associations. The hazard ratio was adjusted by accounting for all possible confounders at the baseline, excluding those with collinearity.

Using Cox models, subgroup analyses comparing patients with and without sICAS, as well as patients with different TOAST subtypes, were conducted to investigate the relationship between non-HDL-C quintiles and ischemic stroke. In addition, a sensitivity analysis of those included in the analysis versus those excluded and those with sICAS versus those without sICAS was conducted.

Given the adjusted HRs/ORs and their 95% confidence intervals, 2-tailed P values of <0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. All analyses were performed using the statistical software package R (http://www.R-project.org, The R Foundation) and Free Statistics software version 1.8.1.

Results

Baseline Characteristics

A total of 3723 patients suspected of experiencing minor ischemic stroke within 72 h of onset were screened for study enrolment. Among them, 662 were deemed ineligible, and 264 individuals were excluded owing to TC or HDL-C deficiencies, absence of intracranial arterial imaging, and failure to receive any statin medication. Due to loss to follow-up, the 3-month and 12-month analyses included a total of 2,713 and 2,544 individuals with acute and noncardiogenic minor stroke, respectively. A comprehensive inclusion flow chart is shown in Fig.1. Based on the non-HDL-C quintiles, Table 1 presents the baseline characteristics of the patients at the 12-month follow-up examination. The mean age of the patients was 61.7±11.8 years and the study population included 1,861 (73.2%) male patients. The fifth quintile of non-HDL-C had a greater proportion of history of dyslipidemia, slightly higher body mass index, higher blood pressure, higher lipid levels, and in-hospital usage of high-intensity statins, antidiabetic drugs, and antihypertensive medications. Patients in the lowest percentile of non-HDL-C were more likely to be male, have a history of ischemic stroke or coronary heart disease, and to have taken statins and antiplatelet drugs more frequently before being admitted to the hospital. Supplemental Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics of the patients included and excluded from this investigation. With the exception of smoking status, history of coronary heart disease, and stroke classification, more patients in the included group received DAPT, high-intensity statins, and hypoglycemic treatment in hospitals. Supplemental Tables 2 and 3 show the baseline characteristics of patients enrolled in a 3-month analysis, as well as the characteristics of patients with and without sICAS. The presence of sICAS was associated with higher systolic blood pressure, higher LDL-C levels, higher NIHSS scores at admission, more history of TIA, and more large-artery atherosclerosis subtypes.

Fig.1.

Flow chart illustrating the inclusion of patients

Table 1.Baseline characteristics of patients included at 12 months according to Non-HDL-C quintiles

Variables Total Non-HDL-C quintiles

Quintile 1,

≤ 2.33 mmol/L

Quintile 2,

2.34-2.81 mmol/L

Quintile 3,

2.82-3.30 mmol/L

Quintile 4,

3.31-3.92 mmol/L

Quintile 5,

≥ 3.93 mmol/L

P value
Patients, n 2544 501 515 510 508 510
Age, Mean±SD 61.7±11.8 62.8±12.3 61.8±11.9 61.7±11.4 60.8±11.9 61.4±11.7 0.11
Male, n (%) 1861 (73.2) 411 (82) 383 (74.4) 393 (77.1) 368 (72.4) 306 (60) <0.001
BMI, Mean±SD 24.9±3.5 24.0±3.3 24.8±3.5 25.1±3.5 25.2±3.5 25.2±3.7 <0.001
NIHSS on Admission, Mean±SD 1.9±1.5 2.0±1.5 1.8±1.5 1.9±1.5 1.9±1.5 2.0±1.6 0.210
LDL-C, mmol/L, Mean±SD 2.6±0.8 1.6±0.5 2.2±0.3 2.5±0.3 3.0±0.3 3.7±0.7 <0.001
TG, mmol/L, Mean±SD 1.7±1.2 1.1±0.7 1.4±0.7 1.6±1.0 1.8±1.0 2.5±1.7 <0.001
SBP, mmHg, Mean±SD 153.1±21.9 149.0±22.3 150.3±20.8 153.9±21.9 156.3±21.1 155.8±22.4 <0.001
DBP, mmHg, Mean±SD 88.5±13.8 86.6±13.6 87.0±13.6 89.1±13.6 90.2±14.2 89.7±13.6 <0.001
Toast, n (%) 0.245
Large-artery atherosclerosis 779 (30.6) 157 (31.3) 149 (28.9) 151 (29.6) 150 (29.5) 172 (33.7)
Small-vessel occlusion 1192 (46.9) 212 (42.3) 248 (48.2) 253 (49.6) 241 (47.4) 238 (46.7)
Other determined etiology 47 (1.8) 15 (3) 10 (1.9) 7 (1.4) 7 (1.4) 8 (1.6)
Undetermined etiology 526 (20.7) 117 (23.4) 108 (21) 99 (19.4) 110 (21.7) 92 (18)
sICAS, n (%) 652 (25.6) 116 (23.2) 119 (23.1) 129 (25.3) 139 (27.4) 149 (29.2) 0.107
Medical history
Hypertension, n (%) 1545 (60.7) 298 (59.5) 301 (58.4) 296 (58) 326 (64.2) 324 (63.5) 0.126
Diabetes mellitus, n (%) 686 (27.0) 127 (25.3) 130 (25.2) 135 (26.5) 132 (26) 162 (31.8) 0.103
Dyslipidemia, n (%) 57 (2.2) 7 (1.4) 10 (1.9) 7 (1.4) 14 (2.8) 19 (3.7) 0.053
Atrial fibrillation, n (%) 15 (0.6) 3 (0.6) 3 (0.6) 3 (0.6) 2 (0.4) 4 (0.8) 0.97
TIA, n (%) 41 (1.6) 11 (2.2) 6 (1.2) 7 (1.4) 11 (2.2) 6 (1.2) 0.478
Ischemic stroke, n (%) 573 (22.5) 179 (35.7) 122 (23.7) 98 (19.2) 89 (17.5) 85 (16.7) <0.001
Myocardial infarct, n (%) 39 (1.5) 5 (1) 13 (2.5) 7 (1.4) 7 (1.4) 7 (1.4) 0.336
Coronary heart disease, n (%) 131 (5.1) 41 (8.2) 25 (4.9) 23 (4.5) 23 (4.5) 19 (3.7) 0.014
Current smoker, n (%) 1108 (43.6) 222 (44.3) 232 (45) 235 (46.1) 227 (44.7) 192 (37.6) 0.052
Alcohol, n (%) 896 (35.2) 181 (36.1) 179 (34.8) 180 (35.3) 188 (37) 168 (33) 0.729
Previous treatment history, n (%)
Antiplatelet therapy 293 (11.5) 121 (24.2) 58 (11.3) 49 (9.6) 27 (5.3) 38 (7.5) <0.001
Statins 192 (7.5) 93 (18.6) 41 (8) 20 (3.9) 19 (3.7) 19 (3.7) <0.001
Antihypertensive therapy 1048 (41.2) 206 (41.1) 224 (43.5) 201 (39.4) 215 (42.3) 202 (39.6) 0.671
Antidiabetic therapy 515 (20.2) 98 (19.6) 95 (18.4) 101 (19.8) 94 (18.5) 127 (24.9) 0.232
In-hospital treatment, n (%)
Dual antiplatelet therapy 1571 (61.8) 289 (57.7) 318 (61.7) 323 (63.3) 319 (62.8) 322 (63.1) 0.32
High-intensity statins 1479 (58.3) 261 (52.2) 295 (57.6) 303 (59.9) 311 (61.2) 309 (60.6) 0.025
Antihypertensive therapy 1295 (50.9) 225 (44.9) 249 (48.3) 260 (51) 280 (55.1) 281 (55.1) 0.02
Antidiabetic therapy 683 (26.8) 125 (25) 128 (24.9) 125 (24.5) 136 (26.8) 169 (33.1) <0.001

Abbreviations: HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; BMI, body mass index; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; TOAST, Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment; sICAS, symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis; TIA, transient ischemic attack.

Supplemental Table 1.Baseline characteristics of patients included and excluded due to missing data, not taking statins and missing visits

Variables Total (n = 3061) 0 (n = 348) 1 (n = 2713) p
Age, Mean±SD 61.7±12.0 62.7±13.2 61.6±11.9 0.112
Sex, n (%) 0.688
female 817 (26.7) 96 (27.6) 721 (26.6)
male 2244 (73.3) 252 (72.4) 1992 (73.4)
BMI, Mean±SD 24.9±3.6 24.9±3.5 24.9±3.6 0.958
Systolic pressure, Mean±SD 153.0±21.9 154.1±22.4 152.8±21.8 0.29
Diastolic pressure, Mean±SD 88.5±13.7 88.8±13.7 88.4±13.7 0.599
NIHSS on admission, n (%) 0.793
0 659 (21.5) 70 (20.1) 589 (21.7)
1 667 (21.8) 68 (19.5) 599 (22.1)
2 670 (21.9) 83 (23.9) 587 (21.6)
3 482 (15.7) 56 (16.1) 426 (15.7)
4 357 (11.7) 43 (12.4) 314 (11.6)
5 226 (7.4) 28 (8) 198 (7.3)
Toast, n (%) <0.001
LAA 910 (29.7) 84 (24.1) 826 (30.4)
SVO 1425 (46.6) 154 (44.3) 1271 (46.8)
OE 51 (1.7) 3 (0.9) 48 (1.8)
UD 675 (22.1) 107 (30.7) 568 (20.9)
LDL-C, Mean±SD 2.6±0.8 2.6±0.9 2.6±0.8 0.478
TG, Mean±SD 1.7±1.2 1.6±0.9 1.7±1.2 0.189
Current smoker <0.001
Yes 1280 (41.8) 97 (27.9) 1183 (43.6)
No 1585 (51.8) 133 (38.2) 1452 (53.5)
Unknown 196 (6.4) 118 (33.9) 78 (2.9)
Alcohol, n (%) 0.184
Yes 1066 (35.1) 105 (30.7) 961 (35.6)
No 1909 (62.8) 228 (66.7) 1681 (62.3)
Unknown 66 (2.2) 9 (2.6) 57 (2.1)
Antiplatelet therapy, n (%) 0.023
SAPT 1192 (38.9) 155 (44.5) 1037 (38.2)
DAPT 1869 (61.1) 193 (55.5) 1676 (61.8)
Lipid lowing therapy, n (%) <0.001
Moderate-intensity statins 1233 (40.3) 150 (43.1) 1083 (39.9)
High-intensity statins 1802 (58.9) 172 (49.4) 1630 (60.1)
No statins 26 (0.8) 26 (7.5) 0 (0)
Antihypertensive therapy, n (%) 0.281
No 1278 (43.8) 126 (48.3) 1152 (43.3)
Yes 1500 (51.4) 122 (46.7) 1378 (51.8)
Antidiabetic therapy, n (%) <0.001
No 2141 (69.9) 212 (60.9) 1929 (71.1)
Yes 743 (24.3) 49 (14.1) 694 (25.6)
Hypertension, n (%) 0.47
No 1212 (39.6) 144 (41.4) 1068 (39.4)
Yes 1849 (60.4) 204 (58.6) 1645 (60.6)
Diabetes mellitus, n (%) 0.888
No 2251 (73.5) 257 (73.9) 1994 (73.5)
Yes 810 (26.5) 91 (26.1) 719 (26.5)
Dyslipidemia, n (%) 0.952
No 2992 (97.7) 340 (97.7) 2652 (97.8)
Yes 69 (2.3) 8 (2.3) 61 (2.2)
Atrial fibrillation, n (%) 0.449
No 3043 (99.4) 345 (99.1) 2698 (99.4)
Yes 18 (0.6) 3 (0.9) 15 (0.6)
TIA, n (%) 0.298
No 3011 (98.4) 340 (97.7) 2671 (98.5)
Yes 50 (1.6) 8 (2.3) 42 (1.5)
Ischemic stroke, n (%) 0.127
No 2364 (77.2) 280 (80.5) 2084 (76.8)
Yes 697 (22.8) 68 (19.5) 629 (23.2)
Myocardial infarct, n (%) 0.244
No 3013 (98.4) 340 (97.7) 2673 (98.5)
Yes 48 (1.6) 8 (2.3) 40 (1.5)
Coronary heart disease, n (%) 0.022
No 2895 (94.6) 320 (92) 2575 (94.9)
Yes 166 (5.4) 28 (8) 138 (5.1)
Prior antiplatelet therapy, n (%) 0.669
No 2704 (88.3) 311 (89.4) 2393 (88.2)
Yes 348 (11.4) 37 (10.6) 311 (11.5)
Unknown 9 (0.3) 0 (0) 9 (0.3)
Prior statin therapy, n (%) 0.767
No 2820 (92.1) 322 (92.5) 2498 (92.1)
Yes 234 (7.6) 25 (7.2) 209 (7.7)
Unknown 7 (0.2) 1 (0.3) 6 (0.2)
Prior antihypertensive therapy, n (%) 0.56
No 1724 (56.3) 201 (57.8) 1523 (56.1)
Yes 1260 (41.2) 141 (40.5) 1119 (41.2)
Unknown 77 (2.5) 6 (1.7) 71 (2.6)
Prior hypoglycemic therapy, n (%) 0.401
No 2437 (79.6) 281 (80.7) 2156 (79.5)
Yes 607 (19.8) 67 (19.3) 540 (19.9)
Unknown 17 (0.6) 0 (0) 17 (0.6)

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; TOAST, Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment; TIA, transient ischemic attack.

Supplemental Table 2.Baseline characteristics of patients included at 3 months according to Non-HDL-C quintiles

Variables Total Non-HDL-C quintiles

Quintile 1,

≤ 2.33 mmol/L

Quintile 2,

2.34-2.81 mmol/L

Quintile 3,

2.82-3.31 mmol/L

Quintile 4,

3.32-3.92 mmol/L

Quintile 5,

≥ 3.93 mmol/L

P value
Patients, n 2713 536 544 544 542 547
Age, Mean±SD 61.6±11.9 62.5±12.4 61.9±11.8 61.6±11.6 60.7±11.9 61.1±11.6 0.116
Sex, n (%) 1992 (73.4) 440 (82.1) 403 (74.1) 417 (76.7) 395 (72.9) 337 (61.6) <0.001
BMI, Mean±SD 24.9±3.6 24.1±3.4 24.9±3.8 25.1±3.5 25.2±3.5 25.2±3.7 <0.001
NIHSS on admission, n (%) 0.705
0 589 (21.7) 107 (20) 127 (23.3) 121 (22.2) 116 (21.4) 118 (21.6)
1 599 (22.1) 118 (22) 127 (23.3) 116 (21.3) 132 (24.4) 106 (19.4)
2 587 (21.6) 106 (19.8) 118 (21.7) 125 (23) 115 (21.2) 123 (22.5)
3 426 (15.7) 99 (18.5) 76 (14) 86 (15.8) 80 (14.8) 85 (15.5)
4 314 (11.6) 64 (11.9) 63 (11.6) 52 (9.6) 63 (11.6) 72 (13.2)
5 198 (7.3) 42 (7.8) 33 (6.1) 44 (8.1) 36 (6.6) 43 (7.9)
LDL-C, Mean±SD 2.6±0.8 1.6±0.5 2.2±0.3 2.5±0.3 3.0±0.3 3.7±0.7 <0.001
TG, Mean±SD 1.7±1.2 1.1±0.7 1.4±0.7 1.6±1.0 1.8±1.0 2.5±1.7 <0.001
Systolic pressure, mmHg, Mean±SD 152.8±21.8 148.9±22.0 150.2±21.0 153.6±22.0 155.9±21.2 155.5±22.2 <0.001
Diastolic pressure, mmHg, Mean±SD 88.4±13.7 86.6±13.4 86.8±13.5 89.0±13.5 90.0±14.4 89.5±13.5 <0.001
Toast, n (%) 0.133
Large-artery atherosclerosis 826 (30.4) 167 (31.2) 159 (29.2) 161 (29.6) 156 (28.8) 183 (33.5)
Small-vessel occlusion 1271 (46.8) 224 (41.8) 259 (47.6) 270 (49.6) 261 (48.2) 257 (47)
Other determined etiology 48 (1.8) 15 (2.8) 11 (2) 7 (1.3) 7 (1.3) 8 (1.5)
Undetermined etiology 568 (20.9) 130 (24.3) 115 (21.1) 106 (19.5) 118 (21.8) 99 (18.1)
sICAS, n (%) 690 (25.4) 123 (22.9) 129 (23.7) 137 (25.2) 143 (26.4) 158 (28.9) 0.177
Medical history
Hypertension, n (%) 1645 (60.6) 318 (59.3) 319 (58.6) 316 (58.1) 346 (63.8) 346 (63.3) 0.154
Diabetes mellitus, n (%) 719 (26.5) 135 (25.2) 136 (25) 143 (26.3) 139 (25.6) 166 (30.3) 0.242
Dyslipidemia, n (%) 61 (2.2) 8 (1.5) 10 (1.8) 8 (1.5) 16 (3) 19 (3.5) 0.082
Atrial fibrillation, n (%) 15 (0.6) 3 (0.6) 3 (0.6) 3 (0.6) 2 (0.4) 4 (0.7) 0.975
TIA, n (%) 42 (1.5) 11 (2.1) 6 (1.1) 8 (1.5) 11 (2) 6 (1.1) 0.529
Ischemic stroke, n (%) 629 (23.2) 193 (36) 134 (24.6) 108 (19.9) 99 (18.3) 95 (17.4) <0.001
Myocardial infarct, n (%) 40 (1.5) 5 (0.9) 14 (2.6) 7 (1.3) 7 (1.3) 7 (1.3) 0.199
Coronary heart disease, n (%) 138 (5.1) 42 (7.8) 27 (5) 24 (4.4) 25 (4.6) 20 (3.7) 0.022
Current smoker, n (%) 1183 (43.6) 239 (44.6) 246 (45.2) 247 (45.4) 243 (44.8) 208 (38) 0.286
Alcohol, n (%) 961 (35.4) 195 (36.4) 188 (34.6) 192 (35.3) 201 (37.1) 185 (33.8) 0.82
Previous treatment history
Prior antiplatelet therapy, n (%) 311 (11.5) 127 (23.7) 63 (11.6) 51 (9.4) 32 (5.9) 38 (6.9) <0.001
Prior statin therapy, n (%) 209 (7.7) 99 (18.5) 47 (8.6) 21 (3.9) 23 (4.2) 19 (3.5) <0.001
Prior antihypertensive therapy, n (%) 1119 (41.2) 223 (41.6) 239 (43.9) 213 (39.2) 230 (42.4) 214 (39.1) 0.414
Prior hypoglycemic therapy, n (%) 539 (19.9) 105 (19.6) 101 (18.6) 106 (19.5) 97 (17.9) 130 (23.8) 0.364
In-hospital treatment
Dual antiplatelet therapy 1676 (61.8) 310 (57.8) 335 (61.6) 343 (63.1) 344 (63.5) 344 (62.9) 0.303
High-intensity statins therapy 1604 (59.1) 288 (53.7) 321 (59) 324 (59.6) 333 (61.4) 338 (61.8) 0.054
Antihypertensive therapy, n (%) 1378 (50.8) 238 (44.4) 262 (48.2) 279 (51.3) 297 (54.8) 302 (55.2) 0.006
Antidiabetic therapy, n (%) 717 (26.4) 133 (24.8) 135 (24.8) 132 (24.3) 144 (26.6) 173 (31.6) <0.001

Abbreviations: HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; BMI, body mass index; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; TOAST, Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment; sICAS, symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis; TIA, transient ischemic attack.

Supplemental Table 3.Baseline characteristics of patients with and without sICAS in this study

Variables Total (n= 2713) No (n= 2023) Yes (n= 690) p
Age, Mean±SD 61.6±11.9 61.6±11.8 61.5±12.1 0.888
Sex, n (%) 0.079
Female 721 (26.6) 520 (25.7) 201 (29.1)
Male 1992 (73.4) 1503 (74.3) 489 (70.9)
BMI, Mean±SD 24.9±3.6 24.8±3.5 25.1±3.9 0.116
Systolic pressure, mmHg, Mean±SD 152.8±21.8 152.1±21.7 154.9±22.2 0.003
Diastolic pressure, mmHg, Mean±SD 88.4±13.7 88.3±14.0 88.7±13.0 0.573
LDL-C, Mean±SD 2.6±0.8 2.6±0.8 2.7±0.9 0.001
TG, Mean±SD 1.7±1.2 1.7±1.2 1.7±1.2 0.458
Current smoker, n (%) 1184 (44.9) 893 (45.4) 291 (43.4) 0.35
Alcohol, n (%) 961 (36.4) 713 (36.2) 248 (36.7) 0.889
NIHSS on admission, n (%) 0.027
0 589 (21.7) 438 (21.7) 151 (21.9)
1 599 (22.1) 475 (23.5) 124 (18)
2 587 (21.6) 438 (21.7) 149 (21.6)
3 426 (15.7) 306 (15.1) 120 (17.4)
4 314 (11.6) 219 (10.8) 95 (13.8)
5 198 (7.3) 147 (7.3) 51 (7.4)
Toast, n (%) <0.001
Large-artery atherosclerosis 826 (30.4) 233 (11.5) 593 (85.9)
Small-vessel occlusion 1271 (46.8) 1226 (60.6) 45 (6.5)
Other determined etiology 48 (1.8) 32 (1.6) 16 (2.3)
Undetermined etiology 568 (20.9) 532 (26.3) 36 (5.2)
History of hypertension, n (%) 0.219
No 1068 (39.4) 810 (40) 258 (37.4)
Yes 1645 (60.6) 1213 (60) 432 (62.6)
History of diabetes mellitus, n (%) 0.07
No 1994 (73.5) 1505 (74.4) 489 (70.9)
Yes 719 (26.5) 518 (25.6) 201 (29.1)
History of dyslipidemia, n (%) 0.653
No 2652 (97.8) 1976 (97.7) 676 (98)
Yes 61 (2.2) 47 (2.3) 14 (2)
History of atrial fibrillation, n (%) 1
No 2698 (99.4) 2012 (99.5) 686 (99.4)
Yes 15 (0.6) 11 (0.5) 4 (0.6)
History of TIA, n (%) 0.003
No 2671 (98.5) 2000 (98.9) 671 (97.2)
Yes 42 (1.5) 23 (1.1) 19 (2.8)
History of ischemic stroke, n (%) 0.529
No 2084 (76.8) 1560 (77.1) 524 (75.9)
Yes 629 (23.2) 463 (22.9) 166 (24.1)
History of myocardial infarct, n (%) 0.949
No 2673 (98.5) 1993 (98.5) 680 (98.6)
Yes 40 (1.5) 30 (1.5) 10 (1.4)
History of coronary heart disease, n (%) 0.411
No 2575 (94.9) 1916 (94.7) 659 (95.5)
Yes 138 (5.1) 107 (5.3) 31 (4.5)
Prior antiplatelet therapy, n (%) 0.093
No 2393 (88.5) 1772 (87.9) 621 (90.3)
Yes 311 (11.5) 244 (12.1) 67 (9.7)
Prior statins use, n (%) 0.064
No 2498 (92.3) 1851 (91.7) 647 (93.9)
Yes 209 (7.7) 167 (8.3) 42 (6.1)
Prior antihypertensive therapy, n (%) 0.038
No 1523 (57.6) 1158 (58.8) 365 (54.2)
Yes 1119 (42.4) 811 (41.2) 308 (45.8)
Prior hypoglycemic therapy, n (%) 0.115
No 2157 (80.0) 1624 (80.7) 533 (77.9)
Yes 539 (20.0) 388 (19.3) 151 (22.1)

Abbreviations: sICAS, symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis; BMI, body mass index; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; LDL- C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; TOAST, Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment; TIA, transient ischemic attack.

Non-HDL-C and sICAS

This study is the first to investigate the relationship between non-HDL-C levels and the prevalence of sICAS. Among the 2,713 patients with minor ischemic stroke initially included in this study, 690 (25.4%) were diagnosed with sICAS (Supplemental Table 2). The findings of the univariate logistic regression analysis of the association between non-HDL-C and sICAS are shown in Supplemental Table 4. After adjusting for potential confounders in the multivariate logistic regression models, the risk of sICAS increased by 14% for each unit increase in non-HDL-C when considered as a continuous variable (OR, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.04–1.24]; P=0.005 at 12 months). As quintiles, the risk of sICAS increased by 36% in the fifth quintile of non-HDL-C in comparison to the first quintile (OR 1.36 [95% CI, 1.01-1.81]; P=0.040 at 12 months) (Table 2). The OR for 3-month analysis of sICAS incidence was 1.12 ([95% CI 1.03–1.22]; P=0.007) when non-HDL-C was considered as a continuous variable and was 1.33 ([95% CI 1.01–1.77]; P=0.044) in the fifth quintile in comparison to the first quintile of non-HDL-C (Table 2). Using a restricted cubic spline, a linear dose-response association between non-HDL-C and sICAS was discovered (Fig.2).

Supplemental Table 4.Univariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors associated with sICAS

Variable 3 months 12 months
OR_95CI P value OR_95CI P value
Age 1 (0.99~1.01) 0.888 1 (0.99~1.01) 0.601
Sex 0.84 (0.69~1.02) 0.079 0.84 (0.69~1.02) 0.083
BMI 1.02 (1~1.04) 0.116 1.02 (0.99~1.04) 0.162
Current smoker 0.92 (0.77~1.1) 0.357 0.9 (0.76~1.08) 0.273
Alcohol 99708.93 (0~2.66780424188916e+281) 0.972 1.02 (0.85~1.23) 0.803
LDL-C 1.18 (1.07~1.31) 0.001 1.2 (1.08~1.34) 0.001
TG 1.03 (0.96~1.1) 0.458 1.02 (0.95~1.1) 0.591
NIHSS on admission, =0 1(Ref) 1(Ref)
NIHSS on admission, =1 0.76 (0.58~0.99) 0.044 0.74 (0.56~0.98) 0.038
NIHSS on admission, =2 0.99 (0.76~1.28) 0.921 1.03 (0.79~1.35) 0.806
NIHSS on admission, =3 1.14 (0.86~1.51) 0.368 1.26 (0.95~1.68) 0.109
NIHSS on admission, =4 1.26 (0.93~1.7) 0.138 1.34 (0.98~1.82) 0.067
NIHSS on admission, =5 1.01 (0.7~1.45) 0.973 1 (0.68~1.47) 0.982
TOAST
Large-artery atherosclerosis 1(Ref) 1(Ref)
Small-vessel occlusion 0.01 (0.01~0.02) <0.001 0.02 (0.01~0.02) <0.001
Other determined etiology 0.2 (0.11~0.36) <0.001 0.2 (0.11~0.38) <0.001
Undetermined etiology 0.03 (0.02~0.04) <0.001 0.03 (0.02~0.04) <0.001
Systolic pressure 1.01 (1~1.01) 0.003 1.01 (1~1.01) 0.002
Diastolic pressure 1 (1~1.01) 0.573 1 (1~1.01) 0.6
History of hypertension 1.12 (0.94~1.34) 0.219 1.15 (0.96~1.38) 0.136
History of diabetes mellitus 1.19 (0.99~1.45) 0.07 1.18 (0.97~1.44) 0.098
History of dyslipidemia 0.87 (0.48~1.59) 0.653 0.94 (0.51~1.74) 0.852
History of atrial fibrillation 1.07 (0.34~3.36) 0.912 1.06 (0.33~3.33) 0.926
History of TIA 2.46 (1.33~4.55) 0.004 2.55 (1.37~4.74) 0.003
History of ischemic stroke 1.07 (0.87~1.31) 0.529 1.13 (0.91~1.39) 0.27
History of myocardial infarct 0.98 (0.48~2.01) 0.949 1 (0.48~2.06) 0.999
History of coronary heart disease 0.84 (0.56~1.27) 0.411 0.89 (0.59~1.35) 0.597
Prior antiplatelet therapy 0.78 (0.59~1.04) 0.094 0.79 (0.59~1.06) 0.114
Prior antihypertensive therapy 1.2 (1.01~1.44) 0.038 1.21 (1.01~1.45) 0.041
Prior hypoglycemic therapy 1.19 (0.96~1.47) 0.115 1.18 (0.95~1.47) 0.136
Prior statins use 0.72 (0.51~1.02) 0.065 0.7 (0.48~1.01) 0.055

Abbreviations: sICAS, symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis; BMI, body mass index; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; TOAST, Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment; TIA, transient ischemic attack.

Table 2.Relationship of Non-HDL-C with sICAS

Non-HDL-C Quintiles (mmol/L) n. total n. event % Crude OR (95%CI)

Crude

P value

Adjusted OR (95%CI)

Adjusted

P value

3 months
Quintile 1, ≤ 2.33 536 123 (22.9) Ref Ref
Quintile 2, 2.34-2.81 544 129 (23.7) 1.04 (0.79–1.38) 0.766 1.04 (0.78–1.38) 0.808
Quintile 3, 2.82-3.30 544 137 (25.2) 1.13 (0.85–1.49) 0.39 1.11 (0.84–1.48) 0.461
Quintile 4, 3.31-3.92 542 143 (26.4) 1.2 (0.91–1.59) 0.191 1.18 (0.89–1.57) 0.254
Quintile 5, ≥ 3.93 547 158 (28.9) 1.36 (1.04–1.79) 0.026 1.33 (1.01–1.77) 0.044
P value for trend 0.014 0.025
12 months
Quintile 1, ≤ 2.33 501 116 (23.2) Ref Ref
Quintile 2, 2.34-2.81 515 119 (23.1) 1 (0.75–1.34) 0.986 1 (0.74–1.34) 0.986
Quintile 3, 2.82-3.30 510 129 (25.3) 1.12 (0.84–1.5) 0.427 1.12 (0.83–1.5) 0.458
Quintile 4, 3.31-3.92 508 139 (27.4) 1.25 (0.94–1.66) 0.124 1.24 (0.93–1.66) 0.149
Quintile 5, ≥ 3.93 510 149 (29.2) 1.37 (1.03–1.82) 0.029 1.36 (1.01–1.81) 0.04
P value for trend 0.008 0.012
Non-HDL-C as continuous
at 3 months 2713 690 (25.4) 1.13 (1.04–1.23) 0.003 1.12 (1.03–1.22) 0.007
at 12 months 2544 652 (25.6) 1.14 (1.05–1.25) 0.002 1.14 (1.04–1.24) 0.005

Adjusted for NIHSS on admission, medication history of statins and antihypertensive agents, history of TIA, and history of ischemic stroke. Abbreviations: HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; sICAS, symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis; OR, odds ratio; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; TIA, transient ischemic attack.

Fig.2. The dose‒response relationship between non-HDL-C and sICAS

(A) Non-HDL-C and sICAS at 3 months. (B) Non-HDL-C and sICAS at 12 months. Solid lines indicate adjusted odd ratio, and the dashed lines indicate the 95% CI bands. A model with 4 knots located at the 5th, 35th, 65th and 95th percentiles was applied.

Non-HDL-C and Clinical Outcomes

A multivariate Cox regression model was used to examine clinical results. The relationships between each confounder and the relevant outcomes are shown in the Supplemental Materials (Supplemental Tables 5, 6, 7, 8).

Supplemental Table 5.Covariate screening for recurrent ischemic stroke at 3-month

Term1 coeff1 Change. percentage1 Term2 coeff2 Change. percentage2 GVIF DF GVIF^(1/ (2*Df)) colinearity select select. VIF
Crude 0.06 Ref. Full -0.06 Ref. 5.955 1 2.44 1 Ref. Pending
Age 0.06 1.6 Age -0.06 0 1.414 1 1.189 0 No No
Sex 0.05 -18.9 Sex -0.06 -2.6 1.503 1 1.226 0 Yes Yes
BMI 0.08 22.1 BMI -0.1 66.4 1.095 1 1.046 0 Yes Yes
NIHSS on admission 0.06 -3.4 NIHSS on admission -0.04 -27.6 1.222 5 1.02 0 Yes Yes
LDL-C -0.14 -332.1 LDL-C 0.08 -226.5 5.238 1 2.289 1 Yes Pending
TG 0.13 103.3 TG -0.19 199.1 1.504 1 1.227 0 Yes Yes
SBP 0.04 -36.8 SBP -0.05 -12.5 1.748 1 1.322 0 Yes Yes
DBP 0.05 -14.4 DBP -0.06 0.2 1.807 1 1.344 0 Yes Yes
Toast 0.07 11 Toast -0.08 27 2.638 3 1.175 0 Yes Yes
sICAS 0.05 -26.5 sICAS -0.06 -3.5 2.219 1 1.49 0 Yes Yes
Hypertension 0.06 -3.4 Hypertension -0.06 -0.5 2.204 1 1.485 0 No No
Diabetes mellitus 0.05 -20.2 Diabetes mellitus -0.06 -0.3 4.258 1 2.063 1 Yes Pending
Dyslipidemia 0.05 -17.5 Dyslipidemia -0.05 -16.8 1.119 1 1.058 0 Yes Yes
Atrial fibrillation 0.06 -2.9 Atrial fibrillation -0.04 -30.6 1.104 1 1.051 0 Yes Yes
TIA 0.06 0 TIA -0.06 -3.3 1.042 1 1.021 0 No No
Ischemic stroke 0.08 22.9 Ischemic stroke -0.06 -0.3 1.31 1 1.145 0 Yes Yes
Myocardial infarct 0.06 -0.8 Myocardial infarct -0.06 0.5 1.038 1 1.019 0 No No
Coronary heart disease 0.06 -0.2 Coronary heart disease -0.06 -0.3 1.085 1 1.041 0 No No
Current smoker 0.06 -6.5 Current smoker -0.05 -16.5 3.059 2 1.323 0 Yes Yes
Alcohol 0.06 -1.7 Alcohol -0.07 14.8 2.856 3 1.191 0 Yes Yes
Prior antiplatelet therapy 0.07 7.9 Prior antiplatelet therapy -0.07 14.6 7.938 2 1.679 0 Yes Yes
Prior statins use 0.05 -17.5 Prior statins use -0.07 14.1 7.085 2 1.631 0 Yes Yes
Prior antihypertensive therapy 0.06 -2 Prior antihypertensive therapy -0.06 -5.3 2.403 2 1.245 0 No No
Prior antidiabetic therapy 0.05 -21 Prior antidiabetic therapy -0.07 12.7 7.223 2 1.639 0 Yes Yes
Dual antiplatelet therapy 0.06 -1.1 Dual antiplatelet therapy -0.05 -16.8 1.114 1 1.055 0 Yes Yes
High-intensity statins 0.06 -7.3 High-intensity statins -0.09 47.1 1.118 1 1.057 0 Yes Yes
Antihypertensive therapy 0.06 2.6 Antihypertensive therapy -0.07 6.3 1.567 2 1.119 0 No No
Antidiabetic therapy 0.05 -24.6 Antidiabetic therapy -0.06 2.7 6.905 2 1.621 0 Yes Yes

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; TOAST, Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment; sICAS, symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis; TIA, transient ischemic attack.

Supplemental Table 6.Covariate screening for recurrent ischemic stroke at 12-month

Term1 coeff1 Change. percentage1 Term2 coeff2 Change. percentage2 GVIF DF GVIF^(1/ (2*Df)) colinearity select select. VIF
Crude -0.04 Ref. Full -0.21 Ref. 4.897 1 2.213 1 Ref. Pending
Age -0.04 -13 Age -0.2 -1.5 1.454 1 1.206 0 Yes Yes
Sex -0.06 38.8 Sex -0.2 -1.8 1.453 1 1.205 0 Yes Yes
BMI -0.03 -14.2 BMI -0.23 13.9 1.118 1 1.057 0 Yes Yes
NIHSS on admission -0.04 -0.9 NIHSS on admission -0.2 -3.9 1.035 1 1.017 0 No No
LDL-C -0.22 442.4 LDL-C -0.03 -85.7 4.315 1 2.077 1 Yes Pending
TG 0 -101.2 TG -0.25 20.4 1.457 1 1.207 0 Yes Yes
SBP -0.06 37.1 SBP -0.2 -3.9 1.74 1 1.319 0 Yes Yes
DBP -0.05 12.1 DBP -0.21 1.7 1.809 1 1.345 0 Yes Yes
TOAST -0.04 -0.7 TOAST -0.21 4.3 2.108 3 1.132 0 No No
sICAS -0.06 40.2 sICAS -0.2 -4.3 1.93 1 1.389 0 Yes Yes
Hypertension -0.04 9.2 Hypertension -0.2 -0.4 2.011 1 1.418 0 No No
Diabetes mellitus -0.05 22 Diabetes.mellitus -0.21 0.2 3.611 1 1.9 0 Yes Yes
Dyslipidemia -0.05 25.9 Dyslipidemia -0.2 -3.9 1.096 1 1.047 0 Yes Yes
Atrial fibrillation -0.04 6.5 Atrial fibrillation -0.19 -8.5 1.095 1 1.046 0 No No
TIA -0.04 -1.8 TIA -0.2 -0.2 1.028 1 1.014 0 No No
Ischemic stroke -0.01 -65.6 Ischemic stroke -0.2 -1.3 1.32 1 1.149 0 Yes Yes
Myocardial infarction -0.04 2 Myocardial infarction -0.21 0.2 1.027 1 1.013 0 No No
Coronary heart disease -0.04 1 Coronary heart disease -0.21 0.1 1.058 1 1.029 0 No No
Current smoker -0.04 7.8 Current smoker -0.2 -0.2 1.584 1 1.259 0 No No
Alcohol -0.04 -0.3 Alcohol -0.21 0.9 1.47 1 1.212 0 No No
Prior antiplatelet therapy -0.03 -29.8 Prior antiplatelet therapy -0.21 2.2 2.128 1 1.459 0 Yes Yes
Prior statins use -0.03 -19.6 Prior statins use -0.2 -1.3 1.923 1 1.387 0 Yes Yes
Prior antihypertensive therapy -0.03 -18.8 Prior antihypertensive therapy -0.19 -6.1 1.946 1 1.395 0 Yes Yes
Prior antidiabetic therapy -0.04 10.1 Prior antidiabetic therapy -0.21 0.2 3.502 1 1.871 0 Yes Yes
Dual antiplatelet therapy -0.04 1.2 Dual antiplatelet therapy -0.19 -6.6 1.102 1 1.05 0 No No
High-intensity statins -0.05 13.6 High-intensity statins -0.22 8.5 1.117 1 1.057 0 Yes Yes
Antihypertensive therapy -0.04 -7.5 Antihypertensive therapy -0.21 0 1.373 1 1.172 0 No No
Antidiabetic therapy -0.05 12.4 Antidiabetic therapy -0.21 0.9 1.378 1 1.174 0 Yes Yes

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; TOAST, Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment; sICAS, symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis; TIA, transient ischemic attack.

Supplemental Table 7.Covariate screening for intracranial hemorrhage at 3-month

Term1 coeff1 Change. percentage1 Term2 coeff2 Change. percentage2 GVIF DF GVIF^(1/ (2*Df)) colinearity select select. VIF
Crude -0.44 Ref. Full -0.69 Ref. 2.705 1 1.645 0 Ref. Ref.
Age -0.44 -0.1 Age -0.69 -0.2 1.43 1 1.196 0 No No
Sex -0.45 1.9 Sex -0.69 -0.4 1.524 1 1.235 0 No No
BMI -0.51 15.7 BMI -0.7 1.6 1.113 1 1.055 0 Yes Yes
SBP -0.43 -1.2 SBP -0.7 1.1 1.996 1 1.413 0 No No
DBP -0.44 -0.2 DBP -0.71 2.6 2.04 1 1.428 0 No No
LDL-C -0.68 55.5 LDL-C -0.53 -23.4 2.495 1 1.579 0 Yes Yes
TG -0.35 -21.1 TG -0.69 -0.8 1.355 1 1.164 0 Yes Yes
Current smoker -0.44 0 Current smoker -0.7 1.6 1.703 2 1.142 0 No No
Alcohol -0.48 9.9 Alcohol -0.59 -15.2 1.546 2 1.115 0 Yes Yes
NIHSS on admission -0.44 1.5 NIHSS on admission -0.65 -6.2 1.238 5 1.022 0 No No
Toast -0.41 -6.1 Toast -0.67 -3.5 2.344 3 1.153 0 No No
sICAS -0.46 5.5 sICAS -0.69 -0.7 1.955 1 1.398 0 No No
History of hypertension -0.44 -0.6 History of hypertension -0.69 -0.1 2.684 1 1.638 0 No No
History of diabetes mellitus -0.44 -0.1 History of diabetes mellitus -0.68 -1.4 3.904 1 1.976 0 No No
History of dyslipidemia -0.43 -1.4 History of dyslipidemia -0.7 1.1 1 1 1 0 No No
History of atrial fibrillation -0.44 0.2 History of atrial fibrillation -0.69 0.1 1 1 1 0 No No
History of TIA -0.44 0 History of TIA -0.69 -0.1 1.048 1 1.024 0 No No
History of ischemic stroke -0.42 -4.8 History of ischemic stroke -0.68 -1.5 1.263 1 1.124 0 No No
History of myocardial infarct -0.44 -0.1 History of myocardial infarct -0.7 0.5 1 1 1 0 No No
History of coronary heart disease -0.45 2.4 History of coronary heart disease -0.69 -0.1 1.06 1 1.029 0 No No
Prior antiplatelet therapy -0.49 11.3 Prior antiplatelet therapy -0.69 -0.3 2.038 1 1.428 0 Yes Yes
Prior statins use -0.48 9.3 Prior statins use -0.68 -1.1 2.003 1 1.415 0 No No
Prior antihypertensive therapy -0.4 -7.9 Prior antihypertensive therapy -0.7 1.6 2.631 1 1.622 0 No No
Prior antidiabetic therapy -0.43 -1.8 Prior antidiabetic therapy -0.68 -1.1 10.634 1 3.261 1 No Pending
Dual antiplatelet therapy -0.42 -3.1 Dual antiplatelet therapy -0.72 4 1.08 1 1.039 0 No No
High-intensity statins -0.46 6 High-intensity statins -0.73 5 1.13 1 1.063 0 No No
Antihypertensive therapy -0.41 -6.2 Antihypertensive therapy -0.71 2.7 1.685 2 1.139 0 No No
Antidiabetic therapy -0.45 2.2 Antidiabetic therapy -0.69 -0.4 10.913 2 1.818 0 No No

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; TOAST, Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment; sICAS, symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis; TIA, transient ischemic attack.

Supplemental Table 8.Covariate screening for intracranial hemorrhage at 12-month

Term1 coeff1 Change. percentage1 Term2 coeff2 Change. percentage2 GVIF DF GVIF^(1/ (2*Df)) colinearity select select. VIF
Crude -0.4 Ref. Full -0.55 Ref. 3.725 1 1.93 0 Ref. Ref.
Age -0.39 -0.8 Age -0.55 0 1.409 1 1.187 0 No No
Sex -0.41 3 Sex -0.53 -2.7 1.574 1 1.255 0 No No
BMI -0.45 12.4 BMI -0.59 8.3 1.106 1 1.052 0 Yes Yes
NIHSS on admission -0.4 1.6 NIHSS on admission -0.48 -11.7 1.378 5 1.033 0 Yes Yes
LDL-C -0.61 54.8 LDL-C -0.41 -24.9 3.345 1 1.829 0 Yes Yes
TG -0.33 -16.3 TG -0.52 -5.5 1.367 1 1.169 0 Yes Yes
SBP -0.4 1.3 SBP -0.53 -2.7 1.931 1 1.39 0 No No
DBP -0.4 -0.3 DBP -0.55 0.3 1.934 1 1.391 0 No No
Toast -0.37 -5.7 Toast -0.56 1.7 2.243 3 1.144 0 No No
sICAS -0.42 5.4 sICAS -0.54 -0.6 1.907 1 1.381 0 No No
Hypertension -0.4 0 Hypertension -0.55 0 2.411 1 1.553 0 No No
Diabetes mellitus -0.4 0.2 Diabetes mellitus -0.55 -0.4 5.233 1 2.288 1 No Pending
Dyslipidemia -0.39 -1.8 Dyslipidemia -0.56 2.4 1 1 1 0 No No
Atrial fibrillation -0.4 0.2 Atrial fibrillation -0.55 1 1 1 1 0 No No
TIA -0.4 0 TIA -0.54 -1.4 1.107 1 1.052 0 No No
Ischemic stroke -0.35 -10.9 Ischemic stroke -0.54 -1.5 1.38 1 1.175 0 Yes Yes
Myocardial infarction -0.4 -0.1 Myocardial infarction -0.55 -0.5 1 1 1 0 No No
Coronary heart disease -0.41 3.1 Coronary heart disease -0.55 0 1.039 1 1.019 0 No No
Current smoker -0.4 0 Current smoker -0.55 0.5 1.63 1 1.277 0 No No
Alcohol -0.4 -0.2 Alcohol -0.54 -0.6 1.499 1 1.225 0 No No
Prior antiplatelet therapy -0.4 1.6 Prior antiplatelet therapy -0.55 0.7 2.291 2 1.23 0 No No
Prior statins use -0.4 1.7 Prior statins use -0.55 -0.5 2.146 1 1.465 0 No No
Prior antihypertensive therapy -0.4 0.1 Prior antihypertensive therapy -0.56 1.7 3.031 2 1.32 0 No No
Prior antidiabetic therapy -0.4 0.9 Prior antidiabetic therapy -0.55 0.2 24.154 2 2.217 1 No Pending
Dual antiplatelet therapy -0.38 -4.1 Dual antiplatelet therapy -0.61 10.6 1.085 1 1.042 0 Yes Yes
High-intensity statins -0.4 1.8 High-intensity statins -0.59 6.9 1.127 1 1.062 0 No No
Antihypertensive therapy -0.37 -6.1 Antihypertensive therapy -0.56 1.9 1.6 2 1.125 0 No No
Antidiabetic therapy -0.4 1.9 Antidiabetic therapy -0.54 -0.7 17.893 2 2.057 1 No Pending

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; TOAST, Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment; sICAS, symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis; TIA, transient ischemic attack.

In the 12-month analysis, 13.3% of patients in the fifth quintile of non-HDL-C and 12.6% in the first quintile experienced recurrent ischemic stroke (adjusted hazard ratio 1.19 [95% CI, 0.78–1.80]; P=0.425) (Table 3). The restricted cubic spline between the levels of non-HDL-C and recurrent ischemic stroke is shown in Fig.3. No clear linear relationship was observed. In contrast to those in the first quintile, patients in the top quintile of non-HDL-C had a decreased risk of ICH (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.17–0.91]; P=0.030, Table 3). A total of 68.1% of ICH cases were identified during hospitalization and 75.4% had hemorrhagic transformation (Supplemental Table 9). Using restricted cubic splines, we discovered a linear relationship between non-HDL-C level and the risk of ICH within 12 months. Comparable findings were also observed in the 3-month analysis (Table 3, Fig.3).

Table 3.HRs (95% CIs) for risk of events according to Non–HDL-C quintiles in this study

Outcome Non-HDL-C Quintiles (mmol/L)

Quintile 1,

≤ 2.33

Quintile 2,

2.34-2.81

Quintile 3,

2.82-3.30

Quintile 4,

3.31-3.92

Quintile 5,

≥ 3.93

P value for trend
3 months
Ischemic stroke
Events, n (%) 38 (7.1) 40 (7.4) 41 (7.5) 33 (6.1) 52 (9.5)
Unadjusted HR (95%CI), P value Ref 1.06 (0.68–1.66), 0.791 1.12 (0.72–1.76), 0.608 0.89 (0.56–1.43), 0.636 1.45 (0.95–2.22), 0.082 0.190
Adjusted HR (95%CI), P value Ref 1.20 (0.74–1.92), 0.459 1.28 (0.8–2.06), 0.307 0.99 (0.6–1.65), 0.976 1.58 (0.96–2.6), 0.070 0.191
Intracerebral hemorrhage
Events, n (%) 22 (4.1) 10 (1.8) 9 (1.7) 7 (1.3) 8 (1.5)
Unadjusted HR (95%CI), P value Ref 0.44 (0.21–0.93), 0.032 0.4 (0.18–0.86), 0.020 0.31 (0.13–0.72), 0.007 0.35 (0.16–0.79), 0.011 0.003
Adjusted HR (95%CI), P value Ref 0.43 (0.2–0.93), 0.033 0.36 (0.15–0.83), 0.016 0.27 (0.1–0.69), 0.006 0.37 (0.14–0.95), 0.038 0.008
12 months
Ischemic stroke
Events, n (%) 63 (12.6) 62 (12) 58 (11.4) 45 (8.9) 68 (13.3)
Unadjusted HR (95%CI), P value Ref 0.95 (0.67–1.35), 0.767 0.89 (0.63–1.28), 0.535 0.69 (0.47–1.01), 0.055 1.08 (0.76–1.52), 0.676 0.759
Adjusted HR (95%CI), P value Ref 1.04 (0.71–1.52), 0.844 1.05 (0.71–1.54), 0.823 0.74 (0.48–1.14), 0.169 1.19 (0.78–1.80), 0.425 0.985
Intracerebral hemorrhage
Events, n (%) 27 (5.4) 13 (2.5) 11 (2.2) 7 (1.4) 10 (2)
Unadjusted HR (95%CI), P value Ref 0.46 (0.24–0.89), 0.022 0.39 (0.20–0.79), 0.009 0.25 (0.11–0.58), 0.001 0.36 (0.17–0.74), 0.005 0.001
Adjusted HR§ (95%CI), P value Ref 0.5 (0.25–0.99), 0.047 0.42 (0.2–0.89), 0.023 0.24 (0.1–0.61), 0.002 0.39 (0.17–0.91), 0.03 0.003

Adjusted for sex, BMI, NIHSS on admission, TG, SBP, DBP, Toast, sICAS, history of dyslipidemia, history of atrial fibrillation, history of ischemic stroke, current smoking, medication history of antiplatelet therapy, medication history of statins, medication history of antihypertensive agents, medication history of antidiabetic therapy, dual antiplatelet therapy, high-intensity statins, and antidiabetic therapy.

Adjusted for BMI, TG, and medication history of antiplatelet therapy.

Adjusted for age, sex, BMI, TG, SBP, DBP, sICAS, history of diabetes mellitus, history of dyslipidemia, history of ischemic stroke, medication history of antiplatelet therapy, medication history of statins, medication history of antihypertensive agents, history of antidiabetic therapy, high- intensity statins, and antidiabetic therapy.

§Adjusted for BMI, dual antiplatelet therapy, TG, NIHSS on admission, and history of ischemic stroke.

Abbreviations: HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HR, hazard ratio; BMI, body mass index; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; TG, triglyceride; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; TOAST, Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment; sICAS, symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis.

Fig.3. Hazard ratios of recurrent ischemic stroke and intracranial hemorrhage according to non-HDL-C at 3 months and 12 months

(A) Ischemic stroke within 3 months. (B) intracranial hemorrhage within 3 months. (C) ischemic stroke within 12 months. (D) intracranial hemorrhage within 12 months. Solid lines indicate adjusted odd ratios. Dashed lines indicate the 95% CI bands. Data were fitted with a Cox regression model of restricted cubic spline with 4 knots (at the 5th, 35th, 65th and 95th centiles) for levels of non-HDL-C, adjusting for potential covariates.

Supplemental Table 9.The occurrence time and type of intracranial hemorrhage

Non-HDL-C quintiles, mmol/L Occurrence time of ICH Types of ICH
During hospitalization for mild stroke, n After discharge from mild stroke, n Hemorrhagic infarction, n Intracerebral haemorrhage, n Subarachnoid hemorrhage, n
Quintile 1, ≤ 2.33 18 9 20 6 1
Quintile 2, 2.34-2.81 8 5 9 4 0
Quintile 3, 2.82-3.31 7 4 9 2 0
Quintile 4, 3.32-3.92 7 0 7 0 0
Quintile 5, ≥ 3.93 7 4 7 4 0

Subgroup Analysis

According to subgroup analysis of the 2 sets of data, patients with sICAS and the large-artery atherosclerosis subtype of the TOAST classification in the fifth quintile of non-HDL-C were found to have a proportionately increased risk of recurrence in comparison to those in the first quintile. When comparing the 12-month analysis to the 3-month analysis, this effect was less pronounced. Nevertheless, no interactions were found between the sICAS or TOAST categorization and the non-HDL-C quintile for the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke (Supplemental Tables 10 and 11).

Supplemental Table 10.Subgroup analyses of association between the quintiles of non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (Non- HDL-C) and recurrent ischemic stroke stratified by sICAS and TOAST classification at 3 months

Subgroup Non-HDL-C mmol/L n. total n. event_% Crude HR (95%CI)

Crude

P value

Adjusted HR (95%CI)

Adjusted

P value

P for interaction
sICAS 0.233
Without sICAS Quintile 1, ≤ 2.33 413 28 (6.8) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref)
Quintile 2, 2.34-2.81 415 23 (5.5) 0.76 (0.43~1.33) 0.341 0.85 (0.48~1.5) 0.564
Quintile 3, 2.82-3.31 407 22 (5.4) 0.79 (0.45~1.38) 0.41 0.99 (0.55~1.76) 0.966
Quintile 4, 3.32-3.92 399 18 (4.5) 0.64 (0.35~1.16) 0.142 0.77 (0.42~1.45) 0.423
Quintile 5, ≥ 3.93 389 28 (7.2) 1.07 (0.64~1.81) 0.787 1.35 (0.74~2.45) 0.331
Trend.test 1 (0.88~1.14) 1 1.05 (0.91~1.22) 0.488
With sICAS Quintile 1, ≤ 2.33 123 10 (8.1) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref)
Quintile 2, 2.34-2.81 129 17 (13.2) 1.84 (0.82~4.12) 0.14 2.04 (0.89~4.7) 0.092
Quintile 3, 2.82-3.31 137 19 (13.9) 2.01 (0.91~4.46) 0.086 2.4 (1.06~5.43) 0.036
Quintile 4, 3.32-3.92 143 15 (10.5) 1.53 (0.67~3.51) 0.315 1.87 (0.79~4.47) 0.156
Quintile 5, ≥ 3.93 158 24 (15.2) 2.28 (1.06~4.93) 0.036 2.96 (1.27~6.94) 0.012
Trend.test 1.14 (0.98~1.33) 0.1 1.2 (1.01~1.43) 0.037
TOAST classification 0.139
LAA Quintile 1, ≤ 2.33 167 16 (9.6) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref)
Quintile 2, 2.34-2.81 159 13 (8.2) 0.9 (0.43~1.89) 0.784 0.94 (0.44~2) 0.864
Quintile 3, 2.82-3.31 161 17 (10.6) 1.22 (0.6~2.44) 0.584 1.4 (0.68~2.88) 0.357
Quintile 4, 3.32-3.92 156 14 (9) 1.05 (0.5~2.17) 0.906 1.16 (0.54~2.52) 0.701
Quintile 5, ≥ 3.93 183 26 (14.2) 1.71 (0.9~3.24) 0.099 2.09 (1.01~4.33) 0.046
Trend.test 1.15 (0.99~1.33) 0.077 1.2 (1.01~1.43) 0.035
SVO Quintile 1, ≤ 2.33 224 14 (6.2) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref)
Quintile 2, 2.34-2.81 259 15 (5.8) 0.94 (0.45~1.95) 0.872 1.12 (0.53~2.37) 0.757
Quintile 3, 2.82-3.31 270 10 (3.7) 0.59 (0.26~1.33) 0.205 0.74 (0.32~1.71) 0.483
Quintile 4, 3.32-3.92 261 8 (3.1) 0.43 (0.17~1.06) 0.067 0.57 (0.22~1.45) 0.238
Quintile 5, ≥ 3.93 257 17 (6.6) 1.08 (0.53~2.19) 0.828 1.55 (0.69~3.47) 0.292
Trend.test 1271 64 (5) 0.96 (0.8~1.15) 0.643 1.03 (0.84~1.26) 0.773
OE Quintile 1, ≤ 2.33 15 0 (0) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref)
Quintile 2, 2.34-2.81 11 4 (36.4) 506069522.1 (0~Inf) 0.998

13899158802665408512

(3502247344181315072~

55160757204277534720)

<0.001
Quintile 3, 2.82-3.31 7 2 (28.6) 396510365.7 (0~Inf) 0.998

239102282626023584

(28866679625108116~

1980480689135051008)

<0.001
Quintile 4, 3.32-3.92 7 3 (42.9) 625451307.27 (0~Inf) 0.998

2994958390344955392

(733446368244661120~

12229627343257268224)

<0.001
Quintile 5, ≥ 3.93 8 1 (12.5) 164838647.06 (0~Inf) 0.998

3217748708173934592

(386983568093668224~

26755417032200425472)

<0.001
Trend.test 1.27 (0.85~1.9) 0.252 1.38 (0.76~2.52) 0.287
UE Quintile 1, ≤ 2.33 130 8 (6.2) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref)
Quintile 2, 2.34-2.81 115 8 (7) 0.97 (0.35~2.68) 0.953 0.87 (0.31~2.45) 0.789
Quintile 3, 2.82-3.31 106 12 (11.3) 1.84 (0.75~4.5) 0.182 1.65 (0.66~4.13) 0.282
Quintile 4, 3.32-3.92 118 8 (6.8) 1.08 (0.41~2.88) 0.876 0.97 (0.34~2.71) 0.947
Quintile 5, ≥ 3.93 99 8 (8.1) 1.3 (0.49~3.47) 0.596 1.11 (0.38~3.22) 0.849
Trend.test 1.06 (0.86~1.31) 0.567 1.04 (0.82~1.31) 0.76

Adjusted for age, sex, NIHSS on admission, TG, Toast, history of dyslipidemia, history of atrial fibrillation, history of ischemic stroke, antidiabetic therapy.

Abbreviations: sICAS, symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis; TOAST, Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment; LAA, large-artery atherosclerosis; SVO, small-vessel occlusion; OE: other determined etiology; UE: undetermined etiology.

Supplemental Table 11.Subgroup analyses of association between the quintiles of non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (Non- HDL-C) and recurrent ischemic stroke stratified by TOAST classification and sICAS at 12-month

Subgroup Variable n.total n.event_% crude.HR_95CI

crude.

P_value

adj.HR_95CI

adj.

P_value

P.for. interaction_1
Without sICAS 0.583
Quintile 1, ≤ 2.33 mmol/L 379 45 (11.9) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref)
Quintile 2, 2.34-2.81 mmol/L 388 36 (9.3) 0.76 (0.49~1.18) 0.226 0.86 (0.53~1.38) 0.526
Quintile 3, 2.82-3.31 mmol/L 378 35 (9.3) 0.76 (0.49~1.18) 0.217 0.95 (0.58~1.53) 0.821
Quintile 4, 3.32-3.92 mmol/L 364 25 (6.9) 0.56 (0.34~0.91) 0.019 0.63 (0.36~1.1) 0.102
Quintile 5, ≥ 3.93 mmol/L 353 38 (10.8) 0.9 (0.58~1.39) 0.635 1.14 (0.67~1.94) 0.616
Trend.test 1862 179 (9.6) 0.95 (0.85~1.05) 0.315 1 (0.88~1.13) 0.945
With sICAS
Quintile 1, ≤ 2.33 mmol/L 122 18 (14.8) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref)
Quintile 2, 2.34-2.81 mmol/L 127 26 (20.5) 1.42 (0.78~2.6) 0.25 1.56 (0.81~3.04) 0.187
Quintile 3, 2.82-3.31 mmol/L 132 23 (17.4) 1.21 (0.66~2.25) 0.536 1.28 (0.65~2.52) 0.478
Quintile 4, 3.32-3.92 mmol/L 144 20 (13.9) 0.95 (0.5~1.8) 0.879 1.04 (0.52~2.09) 0.91
Quintile 5, ≥ 3.93 mmol/L 157 30 (19.1) 1.37 (0.76~2.46) 0.292 1.41 (0.7~2.86) 0.338
Trend.test 682 117 (17.2) 1.02 (0.9~1.16) 0.726 1.02 (0.87~1.18) 0.824
TOAST classification 0.581
LAA Quintile 1, ≤ 2.33 mmol/L 157 26 (16.6) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref)
Quintile 2, 2.34-2.81 mmol/L 150 24 (16) 0.95 (0.55~1.66) 0.859 1 (0.54~1.87) 0.993
Quintile 3, 2.82-3.31 mmol/L 152 22 (14.5) 0.87 (0.49~1.53) 0.629 1.08 (0.58~2.04) 0.801
Quintile 4, 3.32-3.92 mmol/L 151 19 (12.6) 0.75 (0.42~1.36) 0.342 0.83 (0.42~1.63) 0.585
Quintile 5, ≥ 3.93 mmol/L 171 32 (18.7) 1.17 (0.7~1.97) 0.544 1.31 (0.68~2.53) 0.423
Trend.test 781 123 (15.7) 1.02 (0.9~1.15) 0.775 1.04 (0.89~1.21) 0.606
SVO
Quintile 1, ≤ 2.33 mmol/L 212 24 (11.3) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref)
Quintile 2, 2.34-2.81 mmol/L 247 24 (9.7) 0.86 (0.49~1.51) 0.592 1.1 (0.6~2.04) 0.755
Quintile 3, 2.82-3.31 mmol/L 250 19 (7.6) 0.65 (0.36~1.19) 0.166 0.91 (0.47~1.74) 0.771
Quintile 4, 3.32-3.92 mmol/L 242 14 (5.8) 0.49 (0.26~0.95) 0.036 0.65 (0.31~1.36) 0.255
Quintile 5, ≥ 3.93 mmol/L 236 23 (9.7) 0.86 (0.49~1.53) 0.611 1.29 (0.65~2.56) 0.467
Trend.test 1187 104 (8.8) 0.92 (0.8~1.06) 0.246 1 (0.85~1.18) 0.993
OE
Quintile 1, ≤ 2.33 mmol/L 15 2 (13.3) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref)
Quintile 2, 2.34-2.81 mmol/L 10 4 (40) 3.34 (0.61~18.3) 0.164 29.49 (0.75~1153.9) 0.07
Quintile 3, 2.82-3.31 mmol/L 7 2 (28.6) 2.28 (0.32~16.21) 0.409 0.67 (0.03~16.55) 0.809
Quintile 4, 3.32-3.92 mmol/L 7 3 (42.9) 3.7 (0.62~22.22) 0.153 1.94 (0.06~57.94) 0.703
Quintile 5, ≥ 3.93 mmol/L 8 1 (12.5) 0.92 (0.08~10.18) 0.948 9.03 (0.29~277.22) 0.208
Trend.test 47 12 (25.5) 1.05 (0.73~1.53) 0.78 0.79 (0.41~1.52) 0.485
UE
Quintile 1, ≤ 2.33 mmol/L 117 11 (9.4) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref)
Quintile 2, 2.34-2.81 mmol/L 108 10 (9.3) 0.96 (0.41~2.25) 0.919 0.91 (0.34~2.4) 0.844
Quintile 3, 2.82-3.31 mmol/L 101 15 (14.9) 1.6 (0.73~3.47) 0.239 1.43 (0.57~3.58) 0.44
Quintile 4, 3.32-3.92 mmol/L 108 9 (8.3) 0.87 (0.36~2.09) 0.75 0.73 (0.26~2.05) 0.552
Quintile 5, ≥ 3.93 mmol/L 95 12 (12.6) 1.35 (0.59~3.05) 0.475 1.05 (0.36~3.03) 0.934
Trend.test 529 57 (10.8) 1.05 (0.88~1.26) 0.584 0.99 (0.78~1.25) 0.906

Adjusted for age, sex, BMI, TG, SBP, DBP, sICAS, history of hypertension, history of dyslipidemia, history of atrial fibrillation, history of ischemic stroke, medication history of antiplatelet therapy, medication history of statins, medication history of antihypertensive agents, high-intensity statins, antidiabetic therapy.

Abbreviations: sICAS, symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis; TOAST, Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment; LAA, large-artery atherosclerosis; SVO, small-vessel occlusion; OE: other determined etiology; UE: undetermined etiology.

Discussion

Our study shows that in mild, noncardiogenic ischemic stroke individuals treated with antiplatelet medications and statin agents, elevated levels of non-HDL-C are not associated with recurrent ischemic stroke but can reduce the risk of intracranial hemorrhage. There was a positive correlation between non-HDL-C level and the incidence of sICAS.

Higher non-HDL-C levels have been associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke in numerous studies focusing on healthy individuals or the general population. However, there is ongoing disagreement regarding the predictive value of non-HDL-C for recurrent stroke after acute ischemic stroke, which may be due to the diversity of the study population. Consistent with the results of the Vitamin Intervention for Stroke Prevention (VISP) trial, non-HDL-C was not significantly associated with the risk of recurrent stroke in patients who had experienced a non-disabling (mRs ≤ 3) and non-cardioembolic cerebral infarction within the previous 120 days16). However, non-HDL-C was positively correlated with the risk of recurrence in individuals with acute ischemic stroke, according to a cohort study involving Chinese patients who had a greater prevalence of stroke recurrence linked to a higher rate of large artery atherosclerotic disease12). It has been demonstrated that non-HDL-C levels can predict atherosclerotic diseases17). High non-HDL-C levels are linked to large-artery atherosclerotic stroke, and exhibit a great impact on large cerebral arteries18, 19). Similar to CHD, large artery occlusive infarction is an atherogenic disease. Thus, it is indicated that in the occurrence of ischemic stroke, non-HDL-C has a greater impact on intracranial large major arteries than on small arteries.

In the subgroup analysis, individuals with the large-artery atherosclerosis subtype and those with sICAS in the highest quintile of non-HDL-C showed a proportionately higher probability of recurrence in comparison to those in the first quintile. In the 12-month analysis, this effect was weakened in comparison to the 3-month analysis. The 30-year life history of the Framingham Offspring group demonstrated that non-HDL-C levels were generally steady20). Statins reduce non-HDL-C levels by having a moderate impact on triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRLs) and significantly lowering LDL-C levels. A meta-analysis showed that different types and doses of statins had varying non-HDL-C lowering effects in individuals with diabetes and a high risk of cardiovascular disease21). In our study, it is possible that the different types and intensities of statins had heterogeneous non-HDL-C lowering effects, as the number of days of statin therapy increased, thereby weakening the impact of non-HDL-C on the prevention of recurrent stroke. The findings of this study highlight the necessity of intracranial imaging examinations in patients with high non-HDL-C levels for the primary prevention of ischemic stroke. For patients with intracranial artery stenosis, in addition to focusing on LDL-C, non-HDL-C levels should also be controlled to achieve the target.

Our study found a negative correlation between non-HDL-C levels and the risk of intracranial hemorrhage within 1 year. The CNSR II study revealed that although there was no statistically significant correlation between non-HDL-C levels and ICH, those in the lowest quintile had a proportionately higher risk of ICH than those in the highest quintile12). In addition, a published study indicated that low non-HDL-C levels are independently associated with a higher risk of hemorrhagic transformation (HT)22). In our cohort, 75% of ICH events were hemorrhagic transformation. The mechanisms that explain the association between non-HDL-C levels and HT or ICH are uncertain. Several published studies suggest that higher cholesterol levels, which lead to increased non-HDL-C values, may help prevent ICH by maintaining the integrity of cerebral blood vessels, reducing erythrocyte membrane permeability, preventing vessel wall leakage and rupture, and promoting platelet aggregation, while also preventing arterionecrosis including arterial fragility, bleeding, and inadequate repair after minor hemorrhage23-26). Further research is needed to determine the relationship and mechanism between non-HDL-C levels and the risk of ICH after ischemic stroke.

The strength of our study was its prospective multicenter design targeting approximately 3,000 mild stroke participants from a real-world context. In addition, our study provides Class III evidence to support that non-HDL-C may be a useful predictor of sICAS, and that elevated levels of non-HDL-C may reduce the risk of ICH in patients with minor stroke (mainly hemorrhagic infarction). This suggests the potential of non-HDL-C as a therapeutic target, primarily for the prevention of stroke caused by intracranial large-artery stenosis. Otherwise, ICH caused by low non-HDL-C levels, especially hemorrhagic transformation after infarction, should be highly valued.

The present study was associated with several limitations. First, only Chinese patients with mild stroke were included in this study. This remains to be investigated in patients of other racial or ethnic backgrounds. Second, with the exception of baseline non-HDL-C levels, non-HDL-C values could not be collected during the follow-up. Furthermore, even though all patients received statin treatment, different types and intensities of statins may have heterogeneous non-HDL-C lowering effects. Nevertheless, statin intensity was adjusted as a covariate in this analysis. Third, owing to the Covid-19 epidemic, the majority of follow-up consultations were conducted over the phone, and the endpoint assessment could not be fully confirmed by hospital records, with the exception of patients who were readmitted at the 8 participating hospitals. More extensive studies on patients with mild stroke are required to confirm the applicability of our findings.

Conclusions

Taken together, in acute, patients with mild ischemic stroke of non-cardiogenic causes, elevated levels of non-HDL-C may reduce the risk of ICH but do not increase the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke. Non-HDL-C levels may be an appropriate predictor of sICAS.

Funding

None.

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to express their gratitude to all participating clinicians, study participants, and their relatives at the eight centers of the SEACOAST study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors state that there is no conflict of interest to disclosure.

Data Availability

Data from this study are available and can be accessed upon reasonable request.

Author Contributions

HF and XN conceived of and designed the study. XN and XW take responsibility for the integrity of the data and accuracy of the data analysis. HF drafted the manuscript and analyzed or interpreted the data. TL proposed and registered the research proposal. YW and KZ were responsible for the analysis and interpretation of the data. All authors were responsible for data collection and manuscript revision.

References
 

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons [Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International] license.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
feedback
Top