Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis
Online ISSN : 1880-3873
Print ISSN : 1340-3478
ISSN-L : 1340-3478
Original Article
Association between the High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Efflux Capacity and the Long-term Prognosis in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-analysis
Itaru HisauchiTetsuya IshikawaKota YamadaTomoaki UkajiMasatoshi ShimuraYohei TamuraYuki KondoTaro TakeyamaKahoko MoriMiona AraiYuichi HoriShiro NakaharaYuji ItabashiSayuki KobayashiIsao Taguchi
Author information
JOURNAL OPEN ACCESS FULL-TEXT HTML

2025 Volume 32 Issue 4 Pages 491-501

Details
Abstract

Aim: We aimed to determine whether baseline high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol efflux capacity (CEC) at the time of coronary angiography (CAG) could serve as a prognostic marker for future major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods: The MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Embase databases were used for data collection. As of April 2024, 2,871 studies have been identified. Clinical studies comparing MACEs over an observational interval exceeding 12 months in patients with angiographically defined CAD with estimated hazard ratios (HRs) of MACEs in the higher or top-quartile HDL-CEC (H-HDL-CEC) group compared with the lower or bottom-quartile HDL-CEC (L-HDL-CEC) group, after adjusting for six confounding variables, including HDL-C, were included. HRs of 1) overall cardiovascular outcomes, composite of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, any coronary revascularization, and all-cause mortality (Model-1), and 2) cardiovascular outcomes excluding all-cause mortality from Model-1 (Model-2), compared between the L-HDL-CEC and H-HDL-CEC groups, were estimated using a random-effects model, respectively.

Results: In five studies, 5,725 patients with CAD with a mean observational interval of 4.9 years were included. The H-HDL-CEC group had significantly lower risks for both estimates (Model-1: HR: 0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.18–0.63 [p=0.0005], and I2=59.8% [p=0.04]; Model-2: HR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.13–0.60 [p=0.0013], and I2=64% [p=0.04]).

Conclusion: This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to demonstrate a significant inverse relationship between the baseline HDL-CECs on CAG and long-term MACEs in CAD patients.

Content from these authors

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons [Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International] license.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top