Journal of Clinical Ethics
Online ISSN : 2435-0621
Print ISSN : 2187-6134
Case study
Ethical dilemmas faced by nurses in life-saving treatment and end-of-life care for patients with severe and enduring anorexia nervosa : Reflections on two cases with contrasting outcomes
Tomoko Saito, Muneaki Kanno
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2026 Volume 14 Pages 52-61

Details
Abstract

  The most severe and chronic forms of anorexia nervosa (AN) are classified as severe and enduring anorexia nervosa (SEAN). Due to extreme physical deterioration, SEAN patients may sometimes require emergency transport and involuntary treatment, raising significant legal and ethical challenges. This study analyzes the ethical dilemmas faced by nurses in two SEAN cases with divergent outcomes, where survival was uncertain, through the framework of ethical principles. As a result, three primary themes were identified : (1) conflicts between life-saving treatment and palliative care, (2) conflicts arising from inadequate treatment due to patient and family non-consent, and (3) conflicts related to treatment resistance and healthcare system challenges. These dilemmas were attributed to uncertain evidence of treatment for SEAN, conflicting values, and systemic inadequacies. This study suggests that nurses, through critical reflection and ethical deliberation, may play a key role in mediating value conflicts among patients, families, and healthcare professionals, thereby encouraging collaborative decision-making.

Content from these authors
© 2026 Japan Association for Clinial Ethics
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top