Geosynthetics Engineering Journal
Online ISSN : 1883-146X
Print ISSN : 1344-6193
ISSN-L : 1344-6193
Comparison of cost-performance effectiveness of conventional and new types of bridge systems consisting of unreinforced or reinforced backfill
Hiroyuki AIZAWAMinehiro NOJIRIDaiki HIRAKAWAHiroki NISHIKIORIYasuo SASADAFumio TATSUOKAKenji WATANABEMasaru TATEYAMA
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2006 Volume 21 Pages 175-182

Details
Abstract
The conventional bridge system consisting of unreinforced backfill and a pair of RC abutment needs long-term maintenance of girder-supports. The settlement of backfill forming a bump and a low seismic stability are other problems. A bridge comprising of a pair of geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS) walls directly supporting a girder with full-height rigid (FHR) facing is structurally simpler. It has a limited allowable girder length, needs long-term maintenance and has a low-seismic stability of the girder-support system. The integral bridge system is structurally simpler, but the thermal cyclic displacement at the facing increases residual earth pressure and backfill settlement. A new bridge system combining a pair of GRS walls with FHR facing and an integral bridge, taking their advantages while alleviating their problems, is proposed. A series of shaking table tests on scaled models of these four bridge systems were performed to validate a high-seismic stability of the proposed system.
Content from these authors
© Japan Chapter of International Geosynthetics Society
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top