Abstract
The author asked student teachers and their guidance teachers questions about the evaluation and improvement of the teaching plans which student teachers had written to use in teaching for action research. The results were as follows. 1. Many student teachers and many guidance teachers stated that "teaching materials and teaching data" were good, but "working upon pupils" was bad. The evaluations of student teachers in both junior and senior high schools pointed out a similar tendency. But, many guidance teachers in junior high schools insisted that "the connection of teaching materials in the present lesson with the ones in previous lessons and teaching materials of other subjects "was bad, and many guidance teachers in senior high schools answered that "the interest and attention of pupils" were bad. 2. Many student teachers and guidance teachers in both junior and senior high schools insisted that "the necessity of the connection between teaching materials and daily life" and "the voluntary activities of pupils for studying" should be improved.
