Journal of Disaster Research
Online ISSN : 1883-8030
Print ISSN : 1881-2473
ISSN-L : 1881-2473
Special Issue on the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquakes
Machine Learning Based Building Damage Mapping from the ALOS-2/PALSAR-2 SAR Imagery: Case Study of 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake
Yanbing BaiBruno AdrianoErick MasShunichi Koshimura
Author information
JOURNAL OPEN ACCESS

2017 Volume 12 Issue sp Pages 646-655

Details
Abstract

Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) remote sensing is a useful tool for mapping earthquake-induced building damage. A series of operational methodologies based on SAR data using either multi-temporal or only post-event SAR images have been developed and used to serve disaster activities. This presents a critical problem: which method is more likely to obtain reliable results and should be adopted for disaster response when both pre- and post-event SAR data are available? To explore this question, this study takes the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake as a case study. ALOS-2/PALSAR-2 SAR images were employed with a machine learning framework to quantitatively compare the performance of building damage mapping using only post-event SAR images and mapping using multi-temporal SAR images. The results show that an overall accuracy of 64.5% was achieved when only post-event SAR images were used, which is 2.3% higher than the overall accuracy when multi-temporal SAR images were used. The estimated building damage ratio for the former and the latter are 29.7% and 31.1%, respectively, which are both close to the building damage ratio obtained from an optical image.

Content from these authors

This article cannot obtain the latest cited-by information.

© 2017 Fuji Technology Press Ltd.

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons [Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International] license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/).
The journal is fully Open Access under Creative Commons licenses and all articles are free to access at JDR Official Site.
https://www.fujipress.jp/jdr/dr-about/
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top