1998 Volume 19 Issue 2 Pages 131-138
Abstract : The discovery of HIV and its clinical, epidemiological and pathological studies leave no doubt in the etiology of AIDS, while Duesberg and his Japanese follower Nishioka raised questions about the AIDS etiology. Their opinions have no novel clinical or experimental grounds but are only caused by their misreading of the references on AIDS. We show here how they misread the references and inform another AIDS debate challenged by Duesberg in the overseas countries where Nature played the main role to support the authors against Duesberg.