Journal of Arrhythmia
Online ISSN : 1883-2148
Print ISSN : 1880-4276
Chairs: Yoshihide Takahashi (Japan), Joseph Y.S. Chan (Hong-Kong), Muhammad Ashraf Dar (Pakistan)
Clinical Significance of Inducibility Test of Atrial Fibrillation after Termination of Chronic, Persistent Atrial Fibrillation during Stepwise Approach
Yasutsugu NagamotoJong-il ChoiJae-Seok ParkJi-Eun BanYae-Min ParkHong Euy LimSang-Weon ParkYoung-Hoon Kim
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2011 Volume 27 Issue Supplement Pages OP30_2

Details
Abstract

Background and Purpose: Atrial fibrillation (AF) termination has been used as the endpoint of catheter ablation of longstanding persistent AF (LPAF). A value of an inducibility testing after achieving AF termination as predicting clinical outcome of catheter ablation of AF is unclear. Methods: In 170 patients with LPAF (>1 year) underwent stepwise approach (pulmonary vein isolation, multiple linear ablations, defragmentation, and bidirectional block of cavotricuspid isthmus), inducibility was tested by rapid atrial pacing after AF terminated. Results: Of 170 patients, induced AF (>5 minutes) in 61 patients (group 1), induced atrial tachycardia (AT) (>10 minutes) (group 2) in 72 and no induction of AF and AT (group 3) in 37. During 39±21 months of follow up, AF recurrence rate in group 1 (n=29, 48%) was similar to that in group 2 (n=34, 35%), however, higher than that in group 3 (n=10, 27%, p<0.05). Conclusion: Noninducibility of AF and AT after termination of LPAF during biatrial ablation led to a better outcome during the follow-up period.

Content from these authors

This article cannot obtain the latest cited-by information.

© 2011 Japanese Heart Rhythm Society
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top