Department of Otorhinolaryngology, School of Medicine, Kagoshima University
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, School of Medicine, Kagoshima University
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, School of Medicine, Kagoshima University
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Koto Hospital
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Juntendo University, School of Medicine
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Juntendo University, School of Medicine
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Tokyo Rosai Hospital
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kanto Teishin Hospital
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Tokai University, School of Medicine
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Tokai University, School of Medicine
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Tokai University, School of Medicine
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Tokai University, School of Medicine
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kawasaki City Hospital
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Nagoya City University, Medical School
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Nagoya City University, Medical School
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Nagoya City University, Medical School
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kasugai City Hospital
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Nagoya City Higashi General Hospital
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Nagoya City Higashi General Hospital
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Koseiren Bisai Hospital
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, koseiren Kamo Hospital
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, koseiren Kamo Hospital
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Osaka University, Medical School
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Osaka University, Medical School
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Osaka Rosai Hospital
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Osaka Rosai Hospital
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kansai Rosai Hospital
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kansai Rosai Hospital
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kansai Rosai Hospital
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kinki Central Hospital
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kinki Central Hospital
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kinki Central Hospital
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hiroshima University, School of Medicine
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hiroshima University, School of Medicine
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hiroshima University, School of Medicine
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Mitsubishi Mihara Hospital
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hiroshima Mitsubishi Hospital
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Koseiren Yoshida General Hospital
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Saiseikai Yamaguchi General Hospital
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Yamaguchi Prefectural Central Hospital
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Nagato General Hospital
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Saiseikal Sendai Hospital
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Saiseikal Sendai Hospital
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kagoshima Seikyo Hospital
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kagoshima Seikyo Hospital
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kagoshima Prefectural Hokusatsu Hospital
Department of Otorhinolafyngology, Satsuma Country Medical Association Hospital
1996 Volume 42 Issue 3 Pages 288-302
(compatible with EndNote, Reference Manager, ProCite, RefWorks)
(compatible with BibDesk, LaTeX)
Ritipenem acoxil (RIPM-AC) was clinically evaluated in 61 patients with sinusitis and the following results were obtained:
1) In the 51 patients in whom clinical efficacy of the drug was evaluated, the efficacy rate was 96% for acute sinusitis, 76% for acute exacerbations of chronic sinusitis, 63% for chronic sinusitis, and 84% for all patients.
2) The eradication rate of the isolated bacteria was 91% for Gram-positive bacteria, 100% for gram-negative bacteria, and 94% for all isolates.
3) The improvement rate (the percentage of patients who showed at least a mild improvements) of the X-ray findings was 69%.
4) Side effects were noted in 2 (3%) of 59 patients, and abnomal laboratory findings M1 (3%) of 30 patients, but none were of any particular clinical significance.
5) The safety rate was 95% (56/59).
6) The usefulness rate was 83% (43/52).
Based on these findings RIPM-AC is thus considered to be highly useful for the treatment of sinusitis.