Abstract
This study was carried out to compare the speech perception ability of patients using hearing aids with hearing levels of 81dB or more (55 patients) and those with cochlear implants (67 patients). The patients with hearing aids were divided into group A (hearing levels 81-90dB, 7 patients), group B (91-100dB, 11 patients), group C (101-110dB, 19 patients), group D (111-120dB, 7 patients), and group E (121-130dB, 6 patients). The patients with cochlear implants were using the strategies of F0F1F2 (14 patients), MPEAK (32 patients) and SPEAK (21 patients). Speech perception tests of monosyllables, words, and sentences under conditions of auditory plus vision were administered. The means and standard deviations of the percentages giving the correct answer in F0F1F2, MPEAK and SPEAK were 45.2±14.7%, 45.7±14.6% and 62.6±15.9% for monosyllables, 44.8±18.9%, 56.3±15.0% and 73.4±15.5% for words, and 64.0±26.4%, 60.5±15.9% and 84.7±13.8% for sentences. In comparison with the results for patients with hearing aids, the speech perception for F0F1F2 and MPEAK was equivalent to that of group C, and that for SPEAK was better than that of group B but poorer than that of group A. In other words, the speech perception ability in conventional cochlear implant strategies-F0F1F2 and MPEAK-corresponded to that of patients with hearing levels of 101-110dB, but that in the new strategy, SPEAK, gave better results than 91-100dB.
