Journal of Japan Industrial Management Association
Online ISSN : 2187-9079
Print ISSN : 1342-2618
ISSN-L : 1342-2618
Multi-item, Multi-stage Dynamic Lot Size Scheduling with Setup Time : Lagrangean Decomposition Coordination Methods
Aditya WARMANKenji MURAMATSU
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2002 Volume 53 Issue 5 Pages 385-396

Details
Abstract

This paper addresses the dynamic lot size scheduling problem for processing multiple items in a multi-stage production system so as to minimize the total cost, consisting of setup costs and holding costs, over the planning horizon under the constraint of shipment requirements. In this problem, there exists various heterogeneous decision features such as lot sizing, lot sequencing, dispatching and so on. We present a Lagrangean decomposition coordination method that enables us to simultaneously solve all of these decision features involved in this problem without specifying or awakening to them one by one. First, splitting the planning horizon into very small time slots, we denote a state of processing as to each item on each machine at the time slot by using a binary decision variable that takes the value of unity if it is processed, or zero if not. Second, dealing with the transition of the inventory state of each item and the time transition of each setup explicitly, we formulate the problem into a multi-dimensional dynamic optimization problem with constraints. Third, paying attention to the separable property of the problem and the existence of interaction constraints related to machine interferences and work-in-process inventory balances, we decompose the whole problem into item-based sub-problems to dissolve the curse of dimensionality. At the aim of guaranteeing the decomposability, problem formulation is made by the concepts of echelon inventory. Each sub-problem is reformulated into the dynamic programming of one dimension. The computational procedure consists of solving sub-problems for given Lagrangean multiplier values and coordinating those values, which is repeated until the interaction constraints are satisfied. Finally, we verify the presented method by solving an illustrated example.

Content from these authors
© 2002 Japan Industrial Management Association
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top