Japanese Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery
Online ISSN : 1883-4108
Print ISSN : 0285-1474
ISSN-L : 0285-1474
Original
Mid-term Results of Endovascular Treatment for Type B Aortic Dissection
Munehiro SaikiYoshinobu NakamuraSuguru ShirayaShingo HaradaYuichiro KishimotoTakeshi OhnoharaTomohiro KurashikiSatoru KishimotoHiromu HorieMotonobu Nishimura
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2016 Volume 45 Issue 3 Pages 101-106

Details
Abstract
Background : Endovascular treatment of the thoracic aorta (TEVAR) for type B aortic dissection is reported to be effective if the interval between the onset and the procedure is relatively short. However, the optimal timing for TEVAR is still controversial. Method : From December 2008 to April 2015, we experienced 46 TEVARs for type B aortic dissection. The interval between onset and TEVAR was within 3 months in 15 cases (Group A), from 3 months to 1 year in 10 cases (Group B), and more than 1 year in 21 cases (Group C). Result : Primary success was obtained in all cases, and no new intimal tear was formed during the procedure. There was no hospital death. At the time of discharge, disappearance of ULP or thrombosed thoracic false lumen occurred significantly more frequently in Group A (93%) than in Group B (50%) and Group C (43%) (p<0.05). At 6 months, the rate of the patients with reduced aneurysm diameter more than 5 mm was significantly higher in Group A (87%) and Group B (70%) than in Group C (19%) (p<0.05). Three cases of Group C had enlargement of the aneurysm despite of TEVAR, and graft replacement of thoracoabdominal aorta was performed in one of the cases. Conclusion : For type B aortic dissection, TEVAR is more effective if performed within 3 months from the onset.
Content from these authors
© 2016 The Japanese Society for Cardiovascular Surgery
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top