The Japanese Journal of Gastroenterological Surgery
Online ISSN : 1348-9372
Print ISSN : 0386-9768
ISSN-L : 0386-9768
The Bone Disorder Following Gastric Resection
Comparative Analysis of the MD and DEXA Methods
Nobukuni TerataHaruo SanoHaruaki IshibashiTohru TaniJunsuke ShibataMasashi KodamaItsuaki YuuItsuo YamamotoRikuji Morita
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

1993 Volume 26 Issue 7 Pages 1929-1935

Details
Abstract
The incidence of postgastrectomy bone disorder was assessed in gastric cancer patients who received a curative operation. The bone mineral content was measured using either microdensitometry (MD) method (n=81 patients) or dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) method (n=55 patients). These two groups were comparable in age, sex (mostly women), and the period after gastric resection (significantly evident more than 3 years after surgery). A similar incidence of bone disorder was observed between the two methods, even though the scores of individual patients did not always show a good correlation. We further investigated the MD method (which was easily and conveniently performed by clinicians) and the DEXA method to exclude the effect of surrounding soft tissue and directly estimate the BMD value of the lumbar bone. The discrepancy between the MD and DEXA methods can be partially explained by the fact that the former includes cortical bone and the latter measures trabecular bone. Of interest is the fact that there was a good correlation between the ΣGS value of the metacarpal MD method and the bone mineral density (BMD) value of the calcaneal single energy X-ray absorptiometry (SXA) method, but not between that of the metacarpal MD and lumbar DEXA methods. There was a remarkable drop in the total score of the MD method after the administration of 1α-OH-D3. These improvements were noted in 12 of 19 cases.
Content from these authors

この記事はクリエイティブ・コモンズ [表示 - 非営利 4.0 国際]ライセンスの下に提供されています。
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.ja
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top