Canon's flat-panel detector

Abstract

We measured and evaluated digital, pre-sampling and overall imaging properties (characteristic curve, modulation transfer function (MTF), Wiener spectrum (WS), noise equivalent quanta (NEQ) ) for Cannon's flat-panel detector (FPD), Fuji computed radiography (FCR) and screen-film (S/F) systems, respectively. First, the digital and overall characteristic curves of FPD and FCR systems were more wide dynamic range than that of the S/F system. Second, the pre-sampling and overall MTF of FPD system were better than those of FCR system a little at lower spatial frequencies than 0.8mm^-1, but the overall MTF of FPD and FCR systems were worse than that of S/F system a little at all spatial frequencies. Third, the digital and overall WS of FPD system were similar or better than those of FCR system, but the overall WS of FPD and FCR systems were worse than that of S/F system. Fourth, the pre-sampling and overall NEQ of FPD system were better than those of FCR system a little at lower spatial frequencies than 1.6mm^-1, but the overall NEQ of FPD and FCR systems were worse than that of S/F system at all spatial frequencies. Comparison of chest phantom images showed that the FPD produced images with quality comparable to or higher than those of the FCR system. From these results, we can expect that the FPD is useful machine by using digital image processing and so on in the radiology department.