Japanese Journal of Evaluation Studies
Online ISSN : 1884-7161
Print ISSN : 1346-6151
ISSN-L : 1346-6151
Special Issue: Diversity and polysemy of evidence in evaluation research and practice
Reconsideration of Contemporary Debates Around Evidence:
Including Credibility and Actionability As Key Concepts
Katsuji ImataTakara TsuzakiMinako Nakatani
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2024 Volume 24 Issue 1 Pages 7-22

Details
Abstract

  In recent years, discussions on evidence have been taking place in various fields such as healthcare, education, and international development. These discussions have also generated a multi-layered discourse about evidence in evaluation research and practice. However, it is difficult to consider that there are common understandings or recognitions of shared concepts. In this paper, we review the polysemy of the term “evidence” and discuss its usefulness, particularly its credibility and actionability. First, we introduce the fundamental conflicts in scientific discourse, the way evidence is treated in evaluation studies, and researchers’ and evaluators’ worldviews as they relate to the treatment of evidence. Second, we introduce four aspects of multifaceted elements that determine the actionability of evidence and present five contextual factors that are key to extracting actionable evidence. Finally, we provide two practical examples that ensure actionability and reconsider the role of evaluators in enhancing the validity of evaluations.

Content from these authors
© 2024 Japan Evaluation Society
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top