Iryo Yakugaku (Japanese Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences)
Online ISSN : 1882-1499
Print ISSN : 1346-342X
ISSN-L : 1346-342X
Regular Articles
Cost-minimization Analysis of S-1 Plus Irinotecan (IRIS) versus Oxaliplatin or Irinotecan Plus Fluorouracil and Folinic Acid (mFOLFOX6 or FOLFIRI) in Patients with Advanced Colorectal Cancer
Hisanori Shimizu, Shunya Ikeda, Hiroyuki Sakamaki, Shuichi Yajima, Naoki Ikegami, Jun-Ichiro Murayama
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2015 Volume 41 Issue 3 Pages 153-162

Details
Abstract
To evaluate the economic impact of regimens including the oral anticancer drug S-1 (a combination of tegafur, gimeracil, and oteracil), we performed cost-minimization analysis to compare the medical costs of S-1 plus irinotecan (IRIS) with those of conventional intravenous treatment with oxaliplatin or irinotecan plus fluorouracil and folinic acid (mFOLFOX6/FOLFIRI) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Patients with advanced colorectal cancer were extracted from the ordering system database for outpatients in Showa University Hospital. Direct medical costs and patients' time-related costs were calculated from the hospital billing data and the average Japanese labor wage, respectively. The results were analyzed from a limited societal perspective. Twenty-nine patients with advanced colorectal cancer were identified, and 25 IRIS regimens, 11 mFOLFOX6 regimens, and 5 FOLFIRI regimens were registered. Mean (± SE) monthly costs of treatment were 183,682 (± 4,767) yen for IRIS regimens and 279,077(± 13,345) yen for mFOLFOX6/FOLFIRI regimens. The monthly cost of IRIS regimens was significantly lower than that of mFOLFOX6/FOLFIRI regimens (P < 0.0001). IRIS regimens are cost-saving compared to mFOLFOX6 or FOLFIRI regimens for the management of advanced colorectal cancer.
Content from these authors
© 2015 Japanese Society of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top