Studies on the tulip mosaic disease in Japan. I

Akira YAMAGUCHI

doi:10.3186/jjphytopath.23.240

Akira YAMAGUCHI

Author information

JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

1958 Volume 23 Issue 5 Pages 240-244

DOI https://doi.org/10.3186/jjphytopath.23.240

Details

Published: December 30, 1958 Received: December 03, 1958 Available on J-STAGE: February 19, 2009 Accepted: - Advance online publication: - Revised: -
Correction information
Date of correction: February 19, 2009 Reason for correction: - Correction: DTRECEIVED Details: Right : 19581203

Date of correction: February 19, 2009 Reason for correction: - Correction: ABSTRACT Details: Wrong : In this paper some accounts are given on a tulip mosaic disease occurring in the central region of Japan.
Seedlings of Lilium formosanum were readily infected by mechanical inoculation of leaf sap expressed from mosaic-infected tulips (varieties, William Pitt and Feu Brilliant). Mottle or streak appeared on the newly developed leaves of lily about two weeks after inoculation. Thereafter, distortions of leaf and flower were noticed.
On the other hand, the results of inoculation to the test plants for cucumber mosaic virus, such as Nicotiana tabacum, N. glutinosa, Cucumis sativus, Phaseolus vulgaris, Vicia faba, and Pisum sativum, were negative, suggesting that the cucumber mosaic virus is not involved in the common mosaic. The causal virus may be identified as so-called tulip mosaic virus (tulip breaking virus). However, it cannot yet be determined whether the virus is color adding or color removing virus described by McWhorter.
The presence of the virus in petal, leaf, bulb, and new bulb from the affected tulips was confirmed by means of sap inoculation to L. formosanum seedlings which served as a test plant. However, expressed sap from a resistant variety or suspected carrier varieties, such as Spring Field (white petal), Golden Harvest (yellow petal), or Queen of the Night (dark purple petal) failed to induce infection of the test plant.
Right : In this paper some accounts are given on a tulip mosaic disease occurring in the central region of Japan.
Seedlings of Lilium formosanum were readily infected by mechanical inoculation of leaf sap expressed from mosaic-infected tulips (varieties, William Pitt and Feu Brilliant). Mottle or streak appeared on the newly developed leaves of lily about two weeks after inoculation. Thereafter, distortions of leaf and flower were noticed.
On the other hand, the results of inoculation to the test plants for cucumber mosaic virus, such as Nicotiana tabacum, N. glutinosa, Cucumis sativus, Phaseolus vulgaris, Vicia faba, and Pisum sativum, were negative, suggesting that the cucumber mosaic virus is not involved in the common mosaic. The causal virus may be identified as so-called tulip mosaic virus (tulip breaking virus). However, it cannot yet be determined, whether the virus is color adding or color removing virus. described by McWhorter.
The presence of the virus in petal, leaf, bulb, and new bulb from the affected tulips was confirmed by means of sap inoculation to L. formosanum seedlings which served as a test plant. However, expressed sap from a resistant variety or suspected carrier varieties, such as Spring Field (white petal), Golden Harvest (yellow petal), or Queen of the Night (dark purple petal) failed to induce infection of the test plant.

Date of correction: February 19, 2009 Reason for correction: - Correction: CITATION Details: Wrong : 1) Ainsworth, G. C.: Ann. appl. Biol., 25: 867-869. (1938).
2) Brierley, P.: Phytopathology, 30: 250-257. (1940).
3) -: ibid., 31: 838-843. (1941).
4) -and McKay, M. B.: ibid., 28: 123-129. (1938).
5) -and Doolittle, S. P.: ibid., 30: 171-174. (1940).
6) -and Smith, F. F.: ibid., 34: 718-746. (1944).
7) Cayley, D. M.: Ann. appl. Biol., 19: 153-172. (1932).
9) Kassanis, B.: Ann. appl. Biol., 36: 14-17. (1949).
11) McKenny Hughes, A. W.: Ann. appl. Biol., 17: 36-42. (1930).
12) -: ibid., 18: 16-29. (1931).
13) -: ibid., 21: 112-119. (1934).
14) McWhorter, F. P.: Phytopathology, 22: 998. (1932).
15) -: ibid., 25: 898. (1935).
16) -: Ann. appl. Biol., 25: 254-270. (1938).
18) van Slogteren, E. and De Bruyn Ouboter, Maria P.: Meded. LandbHoogesch. Wageningen, 45: 54 pp. (1941).
van Slogteren, E.: Ann. appl. Biol., 42: 122-128, 1955.;
- and D. H. M. van Slogteren: Ann. Rev. Microbiol., 11: 149-164, 1957.

Right : 1) Ainsworth, G.C.: Ann. appl. Biol., 25: 867-869.(1938).
2) Brierley, P.: Phytopathology, 30: 250-257. (1940).
3) Brierley, P.: Phytopathology, 31: 838-843.(1941).
4) Brierley, P. and McKay, M.B.: Phytopathology, 28: 123-129,(1938).
5) Brierley, P. and Doolittle, S.P.: Phytopathology, 30: 171-174.(1940).
6) Brierley, P. and Smith, F.F.: Phytopathology, 34: 718-746. (1944).
7) Cayley, D.M.: Ann. appl Biol, 19: 153-172.(1932).
9) Kassanis, B.: Ann. appl. Biol., 36: 14-17. (1949).
11) McKenny Hughes, A.W.: Ann. appl. Biol., 17: 36-42. (1930).
12) McKenny Hughes, A.W.: Ann. appl. Biol., 18: 16-29. (1931).
13) McKenny Hughes, A.W.: Ann. appl. Biol., 21: 112-119. (1934).
14) McWhorter, F.P.: Phytopathology, 22: 998. (1932).
15) McWhorter, F.P.: Ann. appl. Biol., 25: 898. (1935).
16) McWhorter, F.P.: Ann. appl. Biol., 25: 254-270. (1938).
18) van Slogteren, E. and De Bruyn Ouboter, Maria P.: Meded. LandbHoogesch, Wageningen, 45: 54 pp. (1941).

Date of correction: February 19, 2009 Reason for correction: - Correction: PDF FILE Details: -

Abstract

In this paper some accounts are given on a tulip mosaic disease occurring in the central region of Japan.
Seedlings of Lilium formosanum were readily infected by mechanical inoculation of leaf sap expressed from mosaic-infected tulips (varieties, William Pitt and Feu Brilliant). Mottle or streak appeared on the newly developed leaves of lily about two weeks after inoculation. Thereafter, distortions of leaf and flower were noticed.
On the other hand, the results of inoculation to the test plants for cucumber mosaic virus, such as Nicotiana tabacum, N. glutinosa, Cucumis sativus, Phaseolus vulgaris, Vicia faba, and Pisum sativum, were negative, suggesting that the cucumber mosaic virus is not involved in the common mosaic. The causal virus may be identified as so-called tulip mosaic virus (tulip breaking virus). However, it cannot yet be determined, whether the virus is color adding or color removing virus. described by McWhorter.
The presence of the virus in petal, leaf, bulb, and new bulb from the affected tulips was confirmed by means of sap inoculation to L. formosanum seedlings which served as a test plant. However, expressed sap from a resistant variety or suspected carrier varieties, such as Spring Field (white petal), Golden Harvest (yellow petal), or Queen of the Night (dark purple petal) failed to induce infection of the test plant.

Corresponding author

Correction information

Register with J-STAGE for free!