Social reasoning of early adolescents and parents regarding parent–child conflicts

Abstract

Few researches have delineated how adolescents and parents view conflict in familial settings in Japan. Seventh and eighth grade junior high school students (n = 63) and parents (n = 68) were asked to complete a questionnaire using four hypothetical stories to investigate their judgments and reasoning about parent–child situations. Vignettes described health management, household chores, and two situations involving personal choice (clothes and friends) situations. Participants responded differently to personal, prudential, and conventional conflict. Parental acceptance of the child’s demands and discretion and the child’s tendency to reject parental authority were significantly higher for personal than for conventional or prudential conflict, and for conventional than for prudential conflict. Children rejected parental authority more than adults rejected parental authority when the child’s choice was central to the child’s identity; on the other hand, children accepted parents’ conventional demands more often than adults accepted parents’ conventional demands. These results suggest that early adolescents assert their rights when they judge the situation to be in the personal domain.