Japanese Journal of Radiological Technology
Online ISSN : 1881-4883
Print ISSN : 0369-4305
ISSN-L : 0369-4305
Works in Progress
Development of a Novel Body Phantom with Bone Equivalent Density for Evaluation of Bone SPECT
Hajime IchikawaKenta MiwaNorikazu MatsutomoYoichi WatanabeToyohiro KatoHideki Shimada
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2015 Volume 71 Issue 12 Pages 1235-1240

Details
Abstract
We developed a custom-designed phantom for bone single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)-specific radioactivity distribution and linear attenuation coefficient. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the phantom. The lumbar phantom consisted of the trunk of a body phantom (background) containing a cylinder (vertebral body), a sphere (tumor), and a T-shaped container (processus). The vertebral body, tumor, and processus phantoms contained a K2HPO4 solution of bone equivalent density and 50, 300 and 50 kBq/mL of 99mTc, respectively. The body phantom contained 8 kBq/mL of 99mTc solution. SPECT images were acquired using low-energy high-resolution collimation, a 128×128 matrix and 120 projections over 360° with a dwell time of 15 sec/view×4 times. Thereafter, CT images were acquired at 130 kV and 70 ref mAs using adaptive dose modulation. The SPECT data were reconstructed with ordered subset expectation maximization with three-dimensional, scatter, and CT-based attenuation correction. Count ratio, linear attenuation coefficient (LAC), and full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) were measured. Count ratios between the background, the vertebral body, and the tumor in SPECT images were 463.8: 2888.0: 15150.3 (1: 6.23: 32.7). The LAC of the background and vertebral body in the CT-derived attenuation map were 0.155 cm-1 and 0.284 cm-1, respectively, and the FWHM measured from the processus was 15.27 mm. The precise counts and LAC indicated that the phantom was accurate and could serve as a tool for evaluating acquisition, reconstruction parameters, and quantitation in bone SPECT images.
Content from these authors
© 2015 Japanese Society of Radiological Technology
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top