The Journal of the Japanese Society of Clinical Cytology
Online ISSN : 1882-7233
Print ISSN : 0387-1193
ISSN-L : 0387-1193
Original Articles
Comparison of the SurePathTM liquid-based cytology with the conventional cervical testing in cytologic findings
Yusuke MATSUURAHaruko OKAKosho OBARAHitoshi SATOHitoshi FUJIWARASachiko IWAIToshinori KAWAGOENaoyuki TOKIToru HACHISUGAMasamichi KASHIMURA
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2013 Volume 52 Issue 2 Pages 87-95

Details
Abstract
Objective : The purpose of this study was to investigate the cytologic findings of liquid-based cytology (LBC) and conventional cervical testing (CCT).
Study Design : We obtained four Pap test samples from each of 705 patients : CCT with a cotton swab (sample A), CCT with a Cervix-Brush (sample B), LBC with a cotton swab (sample C), and LBC with a Cervix-Brush (sample D). Cytologic evaluation was performed according to The 2001 Bethesda System.
Results : Inadequate samples were frequently observed in samples A (10%) compared to samples B (3%). Low squamous cellularity (less than 5,000) was seen in 25% and 9% of samples C and D, respectively, but most of these samples were derived from atrophic or post-irradiation specimens. Endocervical cell detection was as follows : sample A, 7% ; B, 87% ; C, 4% ; and D, 75%. A clean background was noted in 76%, 64%, 90%, and 81% of samples A, B, C, and D, respectively. Although a different cytologic evaluation was made in 44 of 705 with CCT, and 42 of 705 with LBC, Cervix-Brush samples had a higher cytologic abnormality.
Conclusion : LBC with Cervix-Brush is the best procedure in cervical cancer screening except for specimens derived from postmenopausal and post-irradiated women.
Content from these authors
© 2013 The Japanese Society of Clinical Cytology
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top