Abstract
In the training of the measuring technique, the evaluation of both the training and its effect is one of the important questions to be asked. Especially, in the measurement using the microscope, it should not be overlooked that the error in measurement is, in many instances, attributable to the observer. In this paper, the discussion is concerned with the setting of the training goal, and the guideline for the evaluation of the training effect, and in this connection, the method for the evaluation of the training effect, and the difference in the training effect resulting from the difference of the training method are also discussed. As a result, it has been clarified that (1) in evaluating the training effect, the use of the SN ratio in the measurement is most reasonable and effective; (2) as for the training method, the uses of the manual for the measuring technique, presentation of the pattern in a state of the correct coincidence and the training to take the feedback of the result, especially the uses of the last two have high effect; (3) the greater the complexity of the object to be measured, the greater the effect of the training; (4) where it is aimed to increase the effect of training by the repetition of the training, the training method featuring the feedback of the result of measurement is recommendable.
