The Journal of the Japan Society for Respiratory Endoscopy
Online ISSN : 2186-0149
Print ISSN : 0287-2137
ISSN-L : 0287-2137
Anesthesia on Bronchoscopy: Our Methods With Intarvenous Midazolam Sedation and Experience in Germany (Symposium 8)
Tetsuhiko GoMakoto OdaNorihiko IshikawaHiroiku HaraKazuyuki KawakamiGo Watanabe
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2003 Volume 25 Issue 8 Pages 725-729

Details
Abstract
Since 1996, we have used intravenous midazolam sedation for bronchoscopy and abandoned atropine premedication. We reviewed our experience and assessed the efficacy and safety of our methods. We studied 905 consecutive patients who underwent beonchoscopy from April 1999 to December 2002. Patients were given no premedication. The procedure consisted of; 1) indwelling intravenous catheter and 4% lidocaine spray. 2) Oxygen was supplied at 2l/min by nasal cannula. Oxygen saturation, pulse wave and possible arrhythmia were monitored with pulse oxymeter. 3) Administration of midazolam by slow injection; 0.07 mg/kg (≦59 years), 0.06 mg/kg (60-69), 0.05 mg/kg (70-79), 0.04 mg/kg (80≦). No reverse with flumazenil was done in principle. All bronchoscopies except 3 patients were completed. Those 3 patients were not sedated adequately. There was no termination of procedure due to respiratory depression and without atropine premedication. Awake from sedation was smooth and no problem with outpatients. In Germany rigid bronchoscopy and occasional flexible fiberscopy were performed under general anesthesia with propofol and fentanyl by management of anesthesiologist. Although bronchoscopy under general anesthesia is ideal, we recommend intravenous midazolam sedation for bronchoscopy through our experiences concerning with Japanese medical circumstances.
Content from these authors
© 2003 The Japan Society for Respiratory Endoscopy
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top