Abstract
Rather than the conventional sense of "predicting error," this study focused on "predicting avoidance" as the significance of contrastive analysis. Verification was subsequently conducted using cases of Japanese language education. In doing so, the study took reference from the results of Japanese-Chinese contrastive analysis for the "-teoku" syntax. As a result of this verification, the study was able to successfully predict various points of learning difficulty with regard to the "-teoku" syntax.
