JMA Journal
Online ISSN : 2433-3298
Print ISSN : 2433-328X
Original Research Article
Anticancer Effect of Second-line Treatment for Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Following First-line Treatment with Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitors
Takashi MatsumotoMasaki ShiotaShigetomo YamadaLeandro BlasHidekazu NaganumaKen LeeKeisuke MonjiEiji KashiwagiArio TakeuchiJunichi InokuchiKen-ichiro ShigaAkira YokomizoMasatoshi Eto
Author information
JOURNAL OPEN ACCESS

2022 Volume 5 Issue 1 Pages 83-90

Details
Abstract

Introduction: Studies on the effect of androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI), docetaxel (DTX), and radium-223 (Ra-223) after first-line treatment with ARPI in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) are scarce. This study compared the efficacy of treatment after ARPI for CRPC.

Methods: Patients with CRPC who received ARPI as first-line treatment and different second-line treatments were retrospectively reviewed. Clinicopathological backgrounds and treatment outcomes, including maximum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decrease, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), were compared between second-line treatments.

Results: In total, 88 patients were enrolled. Forty-one (46.6%), 37 (42.0%), and 10 (11.4%) patients were treated with ARPI, DTX, and Ra-223, respectively. Patients whose PSA levels were not adequately reduced by first-line treatment with ARPI were eventually enrolled in the DTX treatment (P = 0.030). PSA decrease was not significantly different when comparing treatments. PFS in the DTX group was significantly better than in the other two groups (P = 0.023). In multivariate analysis, DTX was an independent prognostic factor for better PFS compared to ARPI (hazard ratio, 95% confidence interval; 0.44, 0.25-0.79, P = 0.006). Subgroup analysis showed a favorable impact of DTX on PFS in patients with Gleason score >8 (interaction P = 0.027) and a PSA decline >50% (interaction P = 0.019) during first-line treatment with ARPI. However, no significant difference in OS was observed between groups of different second-line treatments.

Conclusions: This study suggests that in patients with CRPC, second-line treatment with DTX following progression in patients who received ARPI as first-line treatment is more beneficial compared with second-line treatment with ARPI or Ra-233.

Content from these authors
© 2022 Japan Medical Association

JMA Journal applies the Creative Commons Attribution License to all works published by the journal. Anyone may download, reuse, copy, reprint, distribute, or modify articles published in the journal, if they cite the original authors and source. No permission is required from the publisher.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top