Journal of Mammalian Ova Research
Online ISSN : 1347-5878
Print ISSN : 1341-7738
ISSN-L : 1341-7738
Review
A systematic review of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) versus urinary gonadotropin in GnRH protocols for pituitary desensitization in assisted reproduction cycles
Harumi Kubo
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2005 Volume 22 Issue 4 Pages 216-226

Details
Abstract
This article reviews systematically relevant clinical data of rFSH for COS on ART, which were mainly obtained in the Cochrane library, PubMed, MEDLINE, and reference lists of articles. HMG and rFSH have both been used equally successful for COS in ART. However the other review has concluded a statistically significant increase in clinical pregnancy rate with rFSH compared to uFSH, when used for COS in standard IVF cycles and not in cycles in which ICSI was used. Recombinant FSH is a new treatment option for Japanese women undergoing COS for ART with several advantages over conventional urinary gonadotropin preparations. Since SC administration of rFSH is safe, efficacious, and acceptable, the availability of rFSH as a ready-for-use solution supplied in an injector system may make its administration, in particular self-administration by the patient or her partner. The current study indicates that the use of rFSH is not associated with a higher incidence of obstetrical and neonatal problems compared to urinary gonadotropins.
Content from these authors

This article cannot obtain the latest cited-by information.

© 2005 by Japanese Society of Ova Research
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top