Abstract
エビデンスに基づく健康づくりのため,国内外の既存のコホート研究やレセプトのデータ等の知見より,科学的な手法を議論した.米国のHealthy People 2030や英国の例を紹介するとともに,歯科健診・検診についてのエビデンスの作成のための検証手法をまとめた.エビデンスとしては無作為化比較試験RCTが望ましいが,すべての評価が可能とはいえず,これまでの大規模コホートのデータやエビデンスの網羅的な解析を実施すること,一部はシミュレーションなどによる解析も必要である.これらにより,疾病削減効果,QOLの向上及び医療費への影響について評価することが望まれ,これらの知見に基づいた歯科保健政策が望まれる
Translated Abstract
To promote evidence-based health practices, scientific methods were discussed based on insights obtained from existing cohort studies and medical receipt data, both domestically and internationally. Examples from the United States’ Healthy People 2030 and the United Kingdom were introduced, and verification methods for creating evidence related to dental check-ups and examinations were summarized. While randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are desirable as evidence, it is not always possible to evaluate everything. Therefore, comprehensive analyses of data and evidence from large-scale cohort studies that have been conducted to date are necessary, along with some analysis through simulations. It is expected that these methods will facilitate an evaluation of the effects on disease reduction and improvement in quality of life (QOL), as well as the impact on healthcare costs. A dental health policy based on these findings is desired.
References
- [1] 日本歯科医師会.各種資料等.世界会議2015・エビデンス集. Japan Dental Association. [Kakushu shiryoto. Sekai kaigi 2015 / evidence shu.] https://www.jda.or.jp/dentist/program/convention_evidence.html (in Japanese) (accessed 2024-09-24)
- [2] 嶋﨑義浩.口腔の健康状態と全身的な健康状態の関連.e-ヘルスネット 情報提供.Shimazaki Y. [Koku no kenko jotai to zenshintekina kenko jotai no kanren.] e-health net. https://www.e-healthnet.mhlw.go.jp/information/teeth/h-01-006.html (in Japanese) (accessed 2024-10-18)
- [3] FDI World Dental Federation. Evidence-based Dentistry (EBD). https://www.fdiworlddental.org/evidence-based-dentistry-ebd (accessed 2024-10-18)
- [4] Office for Improvement & Disparities, Department of Health & Social Care, NHS England. Guidance. chapter 13: Evidence base for recommendations in the summary guidance tables. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/delivering-better-oral-health-an-evidence-based-toolkit-for-prevention/chapter-13-evidence-base-for-recommendations-in-the-summary-guidance-tables (accessed 2024-10-18)
- [5] Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services. Oral Conditions. Healthy People 2030. https://health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/oral-conditions (accessed 2024-10-18)
- [6] 小椋正之.「歯科口腔保健の推進に関する法律」に基づく基本的事項の特色と今後の歯科口腔保健施策について.保健医療科学.2014;63(2):98-106. Ogura M. [Characteristics of “the Basic matters” based upon the Act concerning the Promotion of Dental and Oral Health and the future direction of community dentistry.] J Natl Inst Public Health. 2014;63(2):98-106. (in Japanese)
- [7] Deaton A, Cartwright N. Understanding and misunderstanding randomized controlled trials. Soc Sci Med. 2018;210:2-21.
- [8] Reckelkamm SL, Alayash Z, Holtfreter B, Nolde M, Baumeister SE. Sjögren’s disease and oral health: A genetic instrumental variable analysis. J Dent Res. 2024;103(3):263-268.
- [9] Tamada Y, Kusama T, Maeda M, Murata F, Osaka K, Fukuda H, et al. Public periodontal screening increases subsequent regular dental visits: The life study. JDR Clin Trans Res. 2024. doi:10.1177/23800844241275859
- [10] Kim N-H, Kawachi I. Did expanded access to denture services improve chewing ability in the Korean older population? Results of a regression discontinuity analysis. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):11859.
- [11] Yamanaka-Kohno R, Shirakawa Y, Yokoi A, Maeda N, Tanabe S, Noma K, et al. Perioperative gum-chewing training prevents a decrease in tongue pressure after esophagectomy in thoracic esophageal cancer patients: a nonrandomized trial. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):23886.
- [12] Ikenwilo D. A difference-in-differences analysis of the effect of free dental check-ups in Scotland. Soc Sci Med. 2013;83:10-18.
- [13] Matsuyama Y, Tsakos G, Listl S, Aida J, Watt RG. Impact of dental diseases on quality-adjusted life expectancy in US adults. J Dent Res. 2019;98:510-516.
- [14] Naito M, Suzukamo Y, Nakayama T, Hamajima N, Fukuhara S. Linguistic adaptation and validation of the General Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) in an elderly Japanese population. J Public Health Dent. 2006;66(4):273-275.
- [15] Fink K, Alkayed K, Schwindling FS, Wiesmüller V. Oral health-related quality of life among refugees: A questionnaire-based study. Healthcare (Basel). 2024;12(15):1525.
- [16] Arora A, Kumbargere Nagraj S, Khattri S, Ismail NM, Eachempati P. School dental screening programmes for oral health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022;7(7): CD012595.
- [17] US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening and preventive interventions for oral health in children and adolescents aged 5 to 17 years: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA. 2023;330(17):1666-1673.
- [18] NICE . Recommendations . Dental checks: intervals between oral health reviews. Clinical guidance CG 19. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg19/chapter/Recommendations (accessed 2024-10-17)
- [19] Ramseier CA, Manamel R, Budmiger R, Cionca N, Sahrmann P, Schmidlin PR, et al. Cost savings in the Swiss healthcare system resulting from professional periodontal care. Swiss Dent J. 2022;132(11):764-779.
- [20] Nakazawa N, Kusama T, Cooray U. Large contribution of oral status for death among modifiable risk factors in older adults: the JAGES prospective cohort study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2023;78(1):167-173.
- [21] Kiuchi S, Matsuyama Y, Takeuchi K, Kusama T, Cooray U, Osaka K, et al. Number of teeth and dementia-free life expectancy: A 10-year follow-up study from the Japan gerontological evaluation study. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2024;25(11):105258 doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105258
- [22]
Matsuyama
Y
Aida
J
Watt
RG
Tsuboya
T
Koyama
S
Sato
S
Unknown
Y
Dental status and compression of life expectancy with disability.
J Dent Res.
2017;
96(9):1006-1013.
- [24] Kahn R, Alperin P, Eddy D, Borch-Johnsen K, Buse J, Feigelman J, et al. Age at initiation and frequency of screening to detect type 2 diabetes: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Lancet. 2010;375(9723):1365-1374.