Comparison of Disaggregate Logit Models Developed by Reported and Coded Network Level-of-Service Measurements

Abstract

The paper compares two types of level-of service (LOS) measurements: those provided by the standard network algorithms are compared with LOS components reported in the interview. Statistical tests show that the two types of measurements are different. Disaggregate mode choice models for works trips are developed by using the two types of data. The goodness-of fit indicators show that those developed by reported LOS measurements are superior to the network-based models. However, aggregation at the interzonal level shows that these is no difference in estimation accuracy between them.