Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi(JAPANESE JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH)
Online ISSN : 2187-8986
Print ISSN : 0546-1766
ISSN-L : 0546-1766
Original article
Gaining consensus on key terms in community health activities: A national survey using the Delphi method
Tomoko NAGAIMaki UMEDAKiyomi ASAHARAYasuko MITSUMORINaoko ENDOYuko EGAWAMaasa KOBAYASHIKazuko SAEKIJunko OMORITaeko SHIMAZUChie KAWASAKISatoko NAGATAKiyomi SAGAWAMikako KONISHI
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2021 Volume 68 Issue 8 Pages 538-549

Details
Abstract

Objectives The purpose of this study was to define the terminology used in community health activities by systematically establishing agreement among public health nurses and related professionals, to aid them in effectively cooperating with other professionals.

Methods We extracted the major terms described in “Guidelines for Public Health Nurses’ Activities in the Region,” which was issued by the Director of Health Bureau, Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare; and conducted 2 iterations on the proposed definition of the terms using the Delphi method. The survey targeted 800 stakeholders from the following 4 professions: public health nurses in managerial positions in local governments, clerical staff in local governments, public health nursing professors at educational institutions, and social welfare council staff. Respondents indicated their degree of agreement with the definition of the terms using a 4-point Likert scale. We tallied the answers indicating “I agree” or “Mostly agree.” A 70% term agreement was considered “conformed.” A free text box for each proposed definition was also available so that respondents could share their opinions and offer alternatives.

Results The first survey received 231 responses. The conformity of their definitions ranged from 83.9%-96.9% (mean=91.5%). Although all definitions exceeded the consensus level, we examined their adequacy with reference to the definitions and opinions from the free text. Various opinions were obtained from those engaged in each occupation. The second round included 117 consenting stakeholders from the first survey, yielding 90 responses. Their degree of conformity ranged from 86.7%-98.9% (mean=94.6%). Therefore, we determined the definitions had reached a robust agreement. We revised the definitions of some terms with reference to the opinions from the free texts and finalized the definitions. Finally, we defined 23 terms—such as region, community diagnosis, and policy.

Conclusion All terms had a conformity of more than 85%, thus bringing into alignment those community health terms that had varying interpretations among related occupations earlier. By including the opinions of those from the related occupations who collaborate with public health nurses, the definitions of these terms could be established and shared. These definitions can be used in public health nursing practice, education, service, and research—among those in involved these related occupations.

Content from these authors
© 2021 Japanese Society of Public Health
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top