The Japanese Journal of Urology
Online ISSN : 1884-7110
Print ISSN : 0021-5287
ISSN-L : 0021-5287
Original Articles
INTRA-ARTERIAL CHEMOTHERAPY FOR BLADDER PRESERVATION IN PATIENTS WITH LOCALLY ADVANCED BLADDER CANCER
Satoshi WashinoMasaru HiraiFumihito TerauchiAtsushi MatsuzakiYutaka KobayashiKatsuhiko Matsuura
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2009 Volume 100 Issue 3 Pages 486-494

Details
Abstract

(Purpose) To evaluate intra-arterial chemotherapy for bladder preservation in patients with locally advanced bladder cancer.
(Patients and methods) A total of 34 patients with locally advanced bladder cancer (T2, n=25; T3, n=9) were treated with intra-arterial chemotherapy. Chemotherapy was consisted of intra-arterial administration of cisplatin (100mg/body), and adriamycin or pirarubicin (50mg/body) every 4 weeks for two cycles. The response was evaluated by TUR, urine cytology, CT and/or MRI 4weeks after the treatment. In 4 patients, we combined this treatment with radiotherapy.
(Results) Among all 34 patients, 12 (35%) patients presented complete response (CR) and 24 patients (70%) presented in objective response (OR). During mean follow up period of 28.7 months, five patients had locally advanced recurrence and one had distant metastasis. The 5-year survival rate was 69.3%. Bladder was conserved in 19 (56%) of all 34 patients. Hematological and gastrointestinal toxicity (more than grade 3) was occurred in 5 and 3 patients. Risk factors on the outcome of this therapy were tumor size>20mm, multiple tumors and clinical stage≥cT3. Patients with no or one risk factor had favorable outcomes; the OR rates of 75-100%, the bladder preservation rates of 71-75% and the 5-year cancer specific survival rates of 83%. Whereas patients with two or three risk factors had unfavorable outcomes; the OR rates of 50-58%, the bladder preservation rates of 25-42% and the 3-year cancer specific survival rates of 0-69%.
(Conclusion) The treatment of locally advanced bladder cancer with intra-arterial chemotherapy seems to be good for patients with less risk factor, but not so good for patients with more risk factors.

Content from these authors
© 2009 Japanese Urological Association
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top