Abstract
For science, will practical document be defined as one material named phlegm, one study means? Or, for a scientific study, will it be defined as decisive methodology? This seems to be natural in applied sciences such as pedagogics and social welfare studies. However, it seems that it is the problem that is required for psychology. This article was submitted to a symposium of a meeting "Shinkaken" of autumn, 2005. The writer submitted this problem as one of critical thinking in psychology and, there, investigated it through analysis of one handicapped child who appeared in practice analysis of Hiroshi Ohoizumi.
